[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They dont call people "Sir" under an act of subjugation, but as a form of politeness and discourse

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 33 points 10 months ago

Oh Neil was worse than that. There are sweaty photos of him with women at Epstein events.

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have been familiar with Neil's work since the 1990s. Shapiro ignorantly tried to bluff his way through this, and imo, damaged his career/audience f or the next couple of years here in the UK. He was and is a laughing stock - even among the rightwing here

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

..sad cry wank?

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 42 points 11 months ago

You're all so obsessed with her breasts you failed to notice him breastfeeding the baby. This is what happens when Christians get too scared of sex education.

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

Silvermann likes to call for this level of bullshit and then cry "but the Jews!!" about the angry replies. She also claimed her twitter replies were all abuse and antisemitism in 2020, but searching I didnt find any more than 3. I mean its possible twitter deleted it all, but having seen other public figures go through shit on there I'm inclined to be sceptical.

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago

This is the way things have gone here in the UK for the past few years. They look for excuses to let the driver off. A few years ago a cyclist got killed a few miles from where I live. He'd ridden up the bridge and the driver had hit him so hard from behind it'd torn his body apart. The cyclist was just riding to work to earn a pittance to support his family.The police kept coming out with excuses: "The sun was in the driver's eyes!" (The sun was coming from behind, and if so why didnt the driver slow down, use his shades?) "The cyclist should have had lights!" (It was fucking daylight, you cretins, plus witnesses said the rider HAD lights on!) "The cyclist had hiviz on but his backpack covered a small bit of it, making it impossible for the driver to see him!" (so he HAD hiviz on, it was visible, daylight and good visibility but the driver couldnt have gone into any of the other 2 lanes and avoided the guy?)

The courts upheld the Police's views and let the driver off

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

Are these people sad-cry-wanking to her videos now?

"I thawt she woz one of uz... waahhh!"

jesusfingwept.

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

I remember having to point this out to a local councillor some 15 years ago. The wanted to expand road development in our city centre from 3 lanes to 4. Whilst it didnt run past homes it was a very busy shopping area at the time. The councillor, at the time, thought that cars didnt pollute, and it was a real struggle to get the point across. Until the local sewerage system got gunked up with a grey paste every time after heavy rain. Turned out that was tyres that had worn. It kind of blocked the water from flowing and had a weird effect.

What made this oddly schadenfraude was the water, when it did come out of the storm drain, discharged into a part of the River Itchen that said councillor liked to fish in. It was probably, and probably is to this day, depleting the fish stocks. We know that microplastics have been found in fish, but we've found other chemicals related to cars have also been found.

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Jesus christ. Anything that shouldnt be there, is by definition pollution. There is salt and calcium in sea water. Would you agree that industrial discharge of salt and calcium is pollution? If so then you have to agree that discharge of manmade carbon dioxide is pollution of the balance of the atmosphere.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Einstein@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net

It came to my attention about a year ago that the word "sm_sh" in this context comes from r_pe terminology. Its put a whole new angle on that phrase, and I now remember the likes of Brand saying it as well as other shamed youtubers.

Now I am not saying they're all abusive people. Not at all. Just that the term originated from abusers. Maybe we should campaign on youtubers content to have the term changed?

[-] Einstein@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

The internet started doing this about 5 years back. Thought covid would bring it back to the hobbyists and people but it became more about streaming and shopping. The rest became more about conspiracies and fake shit. I remember the early 2000s internet. You had a website for everything. And I mean EVERYTHING! Even early youtube you could go off on a tangent but now the sidebar is all thots and influencers trying to sell you shit you dont need.

I like these federation sites now I've discovered them. Feels more in line with the early web, even if I dont always agree with every single political stance.

60
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Einstein@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

I mean, yeah, the guy was possibly a peadophile*, but the comments are saying ALL trans people are peadophiles.

*we only have turning point's word on this. Not like them to lie 🙄

..ifyou want to report the comments and the video its here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jGcqfwRvZ_w

23

Firstly the camera is extremely wide angle. Nobody should expect a truck to just fly across a cyclelane illegally like that and the wrong way into another cyclelane. The comments have filled up with abusive gaslighting blaming Vine for things he didnt do (eg running a red, etc), and people just generally abusing the guy because they've decided they dont like him. Thisis what our urban environment, and our legal/police system have lead to in the UK.

view more: next ›

Einstein

joined 1 year ago