this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
185 points (98.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fucking no strike clause, what the FUCK

Liberals are fucking moronic scum, we have no freedom, we have no rights, we are granted no provisions for our betterment or even protection or basic decision making

I will destroy this evil land, I will spill the blood of oppressors and free my fellow workers from their chains

I AM RISEN lenin-shining

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

My union had this whole fight about the field workers not wanting to advocate for something only the office workers would benefit from (remote work). They threw a whole stink about it and ended up letting management take it away without a fight. Office workers are pissed and we've had a couple quit over it.

Like what the fuck is the point of collective bargaining if you only bargain for things everyone benefits from?

A WIN FOR YOU IS A WIN FOR ME. CLASS SOLIDARITY, MOTHERFUCKERS.

[–] ZapataCadabra@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's part of why I have moved on from "more trade unions is the most important thing." Yes unionization is important and more unions is better than the fewer unions in every way, but they can easily be a dead end. Between the horrible laws in the US that restrict union activity and the reactionary thinking of "fuck you what's in it for me" that is standard to Americans, there's only so much unions can do.

It's why I think a revolutionary workers' party is necessary that works closely with unions but isn't beholden to them.

[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Part of the reason I went for this job is because of an episode of Revleft. I cant remember the episode and its been years now... but they spoke about a lot of trade unions being very right leaning, especially for being a union. In particular, the IBEW is especially bad. But, getting lefties into these groups and pushing then further left is possible and very impactful.

Amazon workers trying to strike in the town over? Well, good thing the utility workers have class solidarity. It'd be a shame for something to "happen" to Amazon's power.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man it's amazing, I work with some super-right wing people- like borderline Q conspiracy nut jobs

But as long as I'm careful about with my phrasing, I can go almost full Marx on their ass and have them nod along. At least when it comes to labor issues.

[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Guys at my place have the thin blue flag on their trucks. I'm in a similar situation.

"Class solidarity"? Thats communist junk. "A win for you is a win for me"? Hell yeah, brother.

"The bourgeoisie's interests can never align with the proletariat" might actually get me punched in the face. "The boss don't give a shit about you" will get a "damn straight!".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AYYY found the episode

Climate Change as Class War: Building Socialism on a Warming Planet

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0fskXlQ1Qrzf19gJlx2v0E?si=-69zj3n2Rg6k1-5Fa91AEQ

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spectre@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The office workers were union too?

[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. Proud engineer and IBEW member here (its weird).

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No yeah there are definitely unionized engineers, just wondering what the expectation was, cause a union advocating for non-union workers would be unusual but potentially cool

[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not super unusual in Healthcare, but nurses build their whole identity around care, so it makes sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

The old guard in a lot of unions is secretly against work from home because it makes it harder for reps to talk to workers.

Imo that's terrible logic because it should be workers talking to workers with reps just there to fill the gaps, and because work from home is a reduction in working hours which is exactly what we should be fighting for.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like what the fuck is the point of collective bargaining if you only bargain for things everyone benefits from?

I mean, the field guys have a point. They would also love to work from home, but they don't have that option. So what is on the table for them in these negotiations?

A good union should be advocating for the entire unit, particularly when everyone is expected to stick their necks out at once. Talk about better hazard pay or overtime or sick leave as part of the negotiation package. It can't just be field workers taking the hit in the name of "solidarity" when the office workers aren't reciprocating.

A WIN FOR YOU IS A WIN FOR ME.

Make the implicit explicit and negotiation for benefits across the entire unit.

[–] Fibby@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So what is on the table for them in these negotiations?

Literally everything you'd expect. Better pay, better retirement, more PTO, more vacation, more budget for safety equipment, etc.

We weren't going out of our way to only cater to one group and forget about everything else. We just wanted to add one thing into the negotiation bundle.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In that case, idk wtf they wanted. That just sucks.

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

A lack of political training resulting in passively absorbed crab bucket mentality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 70 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Folks, I'm getting on my soapbox again. In America, unions are too hobbled by labor laws. Guess what isn't really regulated in any way? Militias. Form a militia. Don't go on strike, everybody just takes the day off for militia training which is done right out front, marching with rifles.

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what gets regulated real fast when leftists exercise their second amendment (pfft) rights? Militias

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eventually, sure. Regulating them is probably good since about 99% of them are blatant white nationalists. I'm sure the pushback would be mostly against leftists or labor organizers, but the existing militias would take some damage too.

[–] Yurt_Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Law existing and law being applied are different things. There is no case the police would raid a white supremacist militia because they probably run it

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] StewartCopelandsDad@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Guess what isn't really regulated in any way? Militias.

this is not true. at least in my state, forming a militia and marching with rifles outside your workplace is quite illegal and will get you v&d

20 ILCS 1805:

It is unlawful for any body of men or women, other than the regularly organized militia of this State, troops of the United States, [and fuddy veterans orgs], to associate themselves together as a military company or organization, to drill or parade with arms in this State, except as hereinafter authorized; but, by and with the consent of the Governor, [private militias approved by the governor] and [military academies].

If you want to use your gun rights for spectacular purposes Black Panthers style, you have to actually know the law like they did. Please read your specific state's laws before you do anything in this area, there are probably lots of pitfalls.

Georgetown law:

All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized militias and military units from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Certainly, states with more restrictive gun laws will likely have more restrictive laws on militias. In my state there's no restrictions. It's probably also worth noting that "activities reserved for the state militia" would be well outside performing regular drills with your co-workers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very common in the US. You can still strike, but it's restricted to after your contract expires. This makes the contract periods restricted to legalistic enforcement of said contract, recruiting, and training.

Some unions can avoid the no-strike provision, but they have top be strong: high engagement, large membership, good leverage, militant leadership. American unions are usually weak and driven by a collaborationist, bureaucratic leadership. It takes a lot of work to run a proper union and the larger unions have figured out that you get a higher return on investment by raking in dues and then going through the motions with little staff or effort. Many will not even accept shops that are 100% ready to unionize, all the organizing done, because they think it won't bring in more dues than justifies staff time (really, they are working in a large overhead for the higher-ups).

On the positive side, you can always create a reform movement within your union. Get like-minded folks together, memorize your union bylaws, and begin strategizing about how you're going to (1) take over union leadership and/or (2) use your own power and narrative-creating abilities to force leadership to do what you want. Make your own demands leading up to the next contract fight! Print your own flyers and signs. Talk to friendly media about what you want.

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The good union, the IWW, had it's members killed, arrested, and deported. The AFL-CIO was probably the compromise that capitalism was willing to allow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The union at my workplace has a policy where they won't do any type of collective bargaining

It's a bit of a long story but the existence of the union is 100% an op and controlled opposition made by the company itself at the advice of Bain consultants

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is more common than people realise. It's called a "yellow union". If you read about the AFL, and the later merge with the CIO, they're pretty far down this path.

[–] heartheartbreak@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Almost the entire history of AFL CIO is class collaboration including infamously Samuel gompers

[–] asparagus9001@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no strike clauses for the duration of the contract is extremely super standard though? it's kinda like the one thing you have to give back to get a contract done

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well they’re fucking us over right now and we can’t do anything about it because of this clause, we have no recourse but to wait and the contract can technically go years without being renegotiated or reaffirmed

[–] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seems like the lack of a firm contract expiration is the bigger issue really. Either way its fucking bullshit

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one two punch of “rule 1 which is good and fair” and “rule 2 which combined with rule 1 destroys the fairness”

Then they can point to rule one and say look how fair we are! While obfuscating rule 2

“Homeless people don’t want to work!”

~~to get a job you need to have recent employment history, a car, a house, and stable life~~

“Fucking lazy homeless”

I hate this world we’ve been made to live in

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

It's usually traded for no-lockout, closed shop and dues checkoff. If they don't get those,then it's an open shop where reps are spending all their time collecting dues and the employer can lay everyone off without just cause.

Sometime they negotiate contracts without it for the sake of a first contract, but it's rare, and tends to reduce membership rates.

There's a cool middle ground UE does sometimes where they get language about striking over grievances or safety issues.

IBT has another cool workaround where they can respect other unions' picket lines.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

you'd best start believing in class collaborationist fascist countries, YOU'RE IN ONE society

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

They can put whatever clause they want, worst that'll happen is they dissolve the union and charge leadership some fines if yall have a wildcat strike. Even then, from what I've read, neither of those usually happen.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And for WHAT?!

We didn’t even get covid protection in our last contract in ‘21, governor had to step in.

Well, it’s okay! We can just bargain for the right to strike back, and if they won’t give it to us we can…. Fucking die I guess?

[–] MMNT@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Start a new union. F that one.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know that for certain unions, the only way to reorganize is to dissolve the union for a year and then start over lolol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can’t be done, if I’m not in the union I can’t have this job

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

A union that can't strike is not a union, my dude

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Just because we can doesn’t mean it’s easy. It’s hard enough to get Americans to strike when it’s legal and they have at least some protections

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I smoke weed to avoid getting high

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do we need rank-and-file committees to agitate within the unions? Or is that trot splitter bullshit?

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Careful friend you’re not on lemmygrad, we have Trot comrades here on hexbear

And also yes we need rank and file agitation!

[–] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it is probably sectarianism so yes, but do we? I can't remember meeting one tbh

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You’re replying to one right now, comrade

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s extremely fucking common

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›