this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
70 points (72.4% liked)

Linux

8551 readers
301 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Maybe I could see that for Windows server. As more of that market moves to azure, the os matters less.

I've heard rumors that the dom0 equivalent in their azure virtualization platform is now Linux based. They still use an in house hypervisor, but may have moved to Linux as the management stack.

It's a long shot, but if Microsoft were moving anything at all, it would be the server product given it actually struggles in market share.

On the desktop, they just don't have much reason. They barely evolve the NT kernel so it doesn't cost them a huge amount. The Linux approach to drivers would completely mess up their driver ecosystem. With the world of modern standby, windows pretty much gave up on long term suspend and instead hibernates, Linux refuses to even try to hibernate with secure boot. The features a Linux kernel brings to the table just do not matter to the windows desktop market. It would be a giant migration expense for no benefit compared to their current strategy of just hosting a Linux kernel as a virtualization guest.

I mean I would love to use a Linux oriented desktop management instead of Windows shell, but it's abundantly clear that would be non negotiable for Microsoft, so I'd end up still stuck with my least favorite part of the windows experience even if the kernel were Linux

[–] thbb@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

There will not be a desktop anymore before linux becomes the only mainstream OS.

Witness: android.

Lpt: guess as many crazy things about the future as possible and some will turn out true, then you can be a prophet

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Some hardcore delulu

[–] chronotron@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

buddy there's a better chance of trump transitioning than this

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

I have marked your words “incorrect”

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 58 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Dumbest take of 2025, I'm calling it early.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Remember, kids: All guesses, zero coherence = bs

[–] Shazburg@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

I'm have whatever he's having

[–] Uncut_Lemon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This won't happen, there is a lot of industrial software that digs it's fingers deep into windows subsystems that wine does not support. Even popular commercial, like adobe, cannot run on wine correctly

At this point I'm not even sure Microsoft knows how some of those sub systems work, they just migrating ancient code bases and patching it enough to make it work again on the new compilers.

So windows kernel will exist untill everyone else leaves.

Move your workflow away from windows, if you can, as Microsoft doesn't care enough about their userbase.

[–] highball@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Naa, I was a Windows kernel dev for Intel a decade ago. We had guys that knew different parts of the kernel. Microsoft engineers know the kernel well. They have to, they have engineers from different companies fixing bugs and making changes. I had my contact for the parts of the kernel I was responsible for and other engineers had their contacts. You have to think, some of these engineers at Intel have been working on the same subsystem for twenty+ years.

So windows kernel will exist until everyone else leaves.

Yeah, that's what he is eluding to. Microsoft keeps adding to Azure Linux. One day, there will be a Windows user land for Linux, i.e. Win/Linux instead of GNU/Linux. It will be much cheaper to run a Win/Linux distro in the cloud than full Windows. Most users just use the browser anyways. Anybody that actually needs a program not supported by the Win/Linux distro can fall back to the full Windows. Eventually everything will be supported on Win/Linux. Plus, WoW64 is already a translation layer for 32bit Windows applications and there are others and have been others over the years. A translation layer to run legacy Windows software would be nothing new for Microsoft.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

a lot of industrial software that digs it’s fingers deep into windows subsystems that wine does not support. Even popular commercial, like adobe, cannot run on wine correctly

I'd be more inclined to believe that these things are so difficult (nearly impossible) to get to work under wine due to some eldritch connection deep into the bowels of windows subsystems so old that current devs don't even know what they do... IF it weren't for the fact that a lot of them have fully functioning MacOS versions out there running. Maybe I'm a conspiracy theorist, but I fully believe a LOT of these big commercial software companies are ACTIVELY working to fight their own software being compatible with Wine - actively spending time, money, and effort to block Linux compatibility (completely negating the usual answer of "it's too expensive to support Linux when so few customers use Linux").

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Yeah that's not going to happen.

However, I think Windows will become more and more tied to the Microsoft cloud offerings.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mark mine: Microsoft and Windows will be promoted by government and people will lap it up. Linux will be vilified and this will be accepted by the public, at least in the USA.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Eh....I don't see it.

I think the more common response would be "What's Linux?"

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So animals evolve towards being crabs, operating systems evolve towards being linux distros?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Animals evolve towards being crabs? Wait, hold on with the linux stuff. Lets circle back to the core concept of this premise.

......crabs?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's a Jon Lajoie song called "Radio Friendly Song". There's a moment in that cong where he's describing the (as of 15 years ago) modern trend of radio friendly songs being the same garbage every song. And the feeling one has thinking that every time a new song is released you would think the general public would eventually reject the same 4 cord note progression in every song. Then, he belts out a line that I wish were isolated, and could becomd a meme onto itself. He's singing about how you would think the public wojld eventually reject these songs, and follows that up with "BUT YOU WERE WROOOONG!!!!"

And I hear that line everytime someone says something blatently wrong, I hear just that line of the song. I wish it were on youtube, isolated so a 3 second soundbyte so I could just post it when I see something like that.

Because readkng you say that Microsoft in 2025 will turn Windows into a Linux distro.......

"But you were wrooooong!!!"

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 2 points 1 day ago

OP is just MC Confusing.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Jon lajoie and I grew up in the same neighborhood (at the same time).. Legend

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow. That's a great story. Now show me your genitals, your genitals. Show me your genitals....YOUR GENITALIA!!!

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But then you realize they DONT sell porcupines on the internet, and you say you know what world, you got me cornered again, I'm gonna roll another joint

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s some strong copium

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No it isn't. It's actually an old theory. Back when Microsoft started their "MS Loves Linux" propaganda, this was the rumour. With all the stuff coming out with .Net, PowerShell, and other tools quickly supporting Linux, that seemed like what was happening.

Actually, that did kindof happen, which is what Azure Linux is, but without the extensive compatibility layer.

[–] ramblingsteve@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think it will become an entirely cloud based OS with a thin client booting the machine straight into their Edge browser. Pay as you go operating system that never leaves their Azure walled garden. Google's Chromebooks were just ahead of their time. As Spock said: "it's Linux Jim, but not as we know it".

[–] Acoustic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

Shut up about the "year of the linux desktop".

It has been the so called year of the linux desktop ever since linux was a thing.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If Windows becomes a Linux distro that might save their share in normal desktop usage.

So I don't see it happening.

They don't care about their users.

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I don't think they would bother doing that much work at the core of the operating system. They are too busy playing with the UI and cloud integrations they don't care about the algorithms the kernel runs on and they have a better driver situation currently anyway. I don't see the route to this.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm sorry to say.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, yeah: Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is bold but actually in a way I think it has a possibility of happening cause Microsoft will figure they can make money from it

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did anyone else read this in a squeaky voice?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

When I killed your brother I talked just like this!

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

It can happen if Microsoft decides not to spend money on making a new kernel because they will need one eventually. But a compatibility layer? Why would they not make it exclusive to Windows?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›