this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
411 points (97.2% liked)

Android

28184 readers
123 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I'm not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots"? Like... wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It's my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I'm taking a screenshot. I don't care about whatever "security" the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can't save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn't have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots" my ass lmao, I'm taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ironically, Google's new creepy Circle to Search feature gets to override the screenshot denial lockout that Google themselves created.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

Doesn't appear to work in my case. I can a blank screen like I would when trying to screenshot.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Of course. When you run a monopoly, you get to make your own rules.

EU should force Google to open Android back up.

[–] RealM__@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Wanna know what's even more fucked up? Few years back, I had exactly this problem. Searched the internet for a solution. Guess what?

Enable Google Voice Assistant and say "Ok Google. Take a screenshot." Google magically has the rights to make a screenshot on the App that doesn't let you, the user, take the screenshot.

Next phone I get is gonna be something with a alternate OS, no Android or iOS.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Good luck with finding an alternative. I tried running a Pinephone Pro with Linux and it was just too buggy to use.

If your current phone lasts 4 more years it might be ok software wise but good god is it bad now.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Don't a lot of people use GrapheneOS?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

People do but it’s Android. They asked for a non iOS non Android system.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

Yes, I use GrapheneOS myself, but just know that it doesn't make any changes to AOSP other than privacy and security enhancements. Apps can still prevent you from taking screenshots on GrapheneOS.

it's for pixel phones only.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That OS won't have those banking apps in the first place, so what's the difference to just not installing them on Android?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fribbtastic@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Man, my banking app recently switched to a different keyboard. One that doesn't allow integrations like bitwarden. I also cannot copy paste my password into the password field so I have to enter my 32 character password by hand.

Mind you, this is not an app that does ANY banking in the first place it is just to authorize access to my bank account or for transactions.

So it is always a few minutes copying the password, making sure I haven't miss-typed on the shitty keyboard or because of my sausage fingers and then being logged out of my bank account in the browser because it took so much time copying that password.

This type of dumbass design is the reason we have passwords like password12345.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I hate the whole bloody smartphone ecosystem for shit like this. Microsoft Palladium was widely seen as a nightmare scenario when it proposed ceding a bunch of user control to the OS and app developers a couple decades ago, even by the mainstream press. It seems Apple and Google used it as a roadmap, likely because people don't know how to use computers, and that doesn't seem to be improving.

The part of the modern mobile OS security model that does have merit is that apps aren't trusted. The PC model, even in multiuser operating systems with fancy permissions was that apps are user agents which are always doing something the user asked for, and therefore trusted as much as the user. The glut of spyware for Windows in the early 2000s proved that false.

The fact that somebody else doesn't know how to use a computer shouldn't force me to cede control over mine to participate in the modern world. Root is a bit of an escape hatch, but it's a blunt instrument on Android, and Google tries to help app developers stop me from using that as well. I'm starting to feel like Richard Stallman was right about everything and I should go be a digital hermit, only running software I compiled from source.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The only apps where this makes any sense are dating apps and similar social apps where a level of social vulnerability is more likely.

Otherwise agree that all others are BS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't have much to add other than my agreement. They've been tightening the noose around our necks little by little for years now. But don't worry, screenshots and copying and pasting text will return...as a microsubscription! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 790@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago (10 children)

The security argument is a lie, I think. I think websites like Netflix like these features so it's difficult to approach copying a video.

If security were an issue I don't think you'd be able to copy text to the clipboard in situations where you can't screenshot.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Yep it's bullshit I hate it too.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

you can bypass this with a rootkit

i think they do it for security reasons. if you can take screenshots of sensitive data, so can malware. however, you should be able to disable it for netflix for example.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Netflix and other streaming apps do it to prevent screen recording their 'premium' content. These use DRM too and the region of protected content shows in black in scrcpy. These apps are much hostile to users much beyond screenshot and shouldn't be used anyway. Most movies and shows can be pirated from torrent, illegal streaming sites or simply telegram in good quality and watched in say vlc for much better experience than these crappy apps provide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago

i think they do it for security reasons.

Yet, on iOS, the same app can't. So it is more like, "ooh a button to twiddle, I'll twiddle it!"

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Yes, it's simple, if you don't want me to screenshot your software then don't display it on my screen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You can bypass this crap, but you'll need to root your phone to achieve that.

Afterwards you'll need to install magisk (superuser app) and a bunch of plugins: play integrity fix and playcurl_next (to simulate that your phone is unrooted), and then FlagSecurePatcher (which is the actual module that's overriding the screenshot block.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TwigletSparkle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I just open my tab switcher, then take a screenshot from there =P

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (6 children)

You mean the "recent apps"?

What Android version?

In any recent Android versions, anything within the app in the "recent apps" would show as all white or all black in any screenshots or screen recordings.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›