196

I didn’t read it yet is it good lol punished-bernie punished-bernie punished-bernie

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sempersigh@hexbear.net 74 points 1 year ago

Okay after skimming through looks not so good even if the overall message is better than most politicians

In recent years, the rapidly growing Chinese economy has eclipsed the US as the world’s major carbon emitter. Right now, China is building six times as many coal-fired power plants as the rest of the world combined – the equivalent of two new coal plants every week. Last year, they quadrupled the number of new coal plants approved compared with 2021. Current plans will see China add as much new coal to its grid as used in all of India, the second largest coal user, and five times more coal capacity as the US.

It is no great secret the Chinese government is undertaking many policies that we and the international community should oppose. They are cruelly repressing and interning the Uyghurs, threatening Taiwan and stifling freedom of expression in Tibet and Hong Kong. China has bullied its neighbors, abused the global trading system, stolen technology and is building out a dystopian surveillance state.

Just awful

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Only the white man possesses the creativity lobe, all other races can only produce lesser imitations of his works." - a thing liberals actually believe but they're totally not racist because they like Hamilton

[-] wantToViewEmojis@hexbear.net 58 points 1 year ago

dont make me tap the sign

"The Russians never invent anything. All they have, they’ve got from others. Everything comes to them from abroad—the engineers, the machine-tools. Give them the most highly perfected bombing-sights. They’re capable of copying them, but not of inventing them. With them, working-technique is simplified to the uttermost. Their rudimentary labour-force compels them to split up the work into a series of gestures that are easy to perform and, of course, require no effort of thought." - Adolf Hitler

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

Weird how liberal thought keeps echoing Hitler. Ah well, I'm sure it's just a coincidence

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 year ago

The "stolen IP" story is fun because it represents an unstated assumption that only the West has good ideas.

When their years of long-term thinking and investment in R&D pay off, will the people kvetching today be willing to license Chinese designs?

I note that the new high speed rail project being promoted in Texas is based on old shinkansen designs from Japan; I wonder if it was just too much lost face to consider a CRH derived design?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

It's also fun because if it was true, it would be proof that the copyright and patent system is stifling for development, competition and innovation

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

who cares about stolen tech, even if they did that would be better for carbon emissions

[-] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

noooooooooooooo! you're solving the climate crisis but you stole our trademarked things to do it!!! you motherfuckers better put that carbon back in the air and do it the RIGHT way!

[-] Vncredleader@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Love being a "life-long socialist" who values IP laws over human progress

How has he forgotten great Randian hero Elmo who keeps trying to steal WeChat and somehow instead blasts pollution all over the American southwest and gets 9000 FAA violations

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

China "stealing" tech is good, but most of the time this complaint isn't even referring to IP infringement or anything clandestine. It's just the tecg transfer agreements that companies happily sign in order to move production to China.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Referring to microchips maybe? Not technically incorrect but I'm confused why it's "wrong"

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have not seen a single credible source that China stole technology for microchips

If you're talking about that singular dude who stole from ASML then that's just a dude

A dude that rocks, might I add

[-] pooh@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

People also forget that the Snowden leaks revealed the NSA was conducting industrial espionage against companies in Europe and China that compete against US companies.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I believe they purchased chips from NVIDIA and AMD no? I see quite a few news stories upon a first duckduckgo but I'm not really sure what to believe on this one.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Anybody can buy chips from NVIDIA and AMD, I'm not sure I follow

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

I believe the suggestion is that they then reverse-engineered them and used what they learned in violation of IP law. I don't follow this, so I don't know if it's true, and I would support China doing this because fuck those companies and the US, but I believe that's the accusation.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yea I mean I know China has reverse engineered a lot of Soviet and Russian weapons exports but I don't think chips and semiconductors is the same since the difficulty is in manufacturing and not what's in it

Companies generally have to transfer IP to even operate in China which is why the stealing IP generally doesn't even have to happen

[-] charlie@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Thanks, this finally makes me gets what they're actually saying with that stupid "China is stealing IP" mouth fart.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

The more I thought about it, the less it made sense; at least how it was built up in my head.

They were just purchasing the chips, and now the USA is trying to block those purchases AND encroach all around the SEA sea while positioning China as aggressors.

Do no Chinese firms have schematics for the chips to be made in Taiwan? Or will this just force China to design their own based on the current top-of-the-line?

I'm not against it, I'm merely posturing questions to learn.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

Semiconductors are hard.

First you need the lithography machines (ASML). Then you need the process development (TSMC, Samsung, Intel). Then you need the EDA tools (Synopsys, Cadence).

SMEE announced a 28nm-capable lithography machine, SMIC has a gimped 7nm process, and Huawei has EDA tools capable down to 14nm.

However, necessity is the mother of invention. I'm expecting the next few years to see an explosion in specialized hardware coming out of Chinese companies.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

stifling freedom of expression in Tibet, . . . abused the global trading system,

God damn what a fucking piece of shit he is. Not just the obligatory hits but really just slinging whatever he can fit in a sentence, plus going to bat for bad-faith accusations from protectionists.

[-] RoomAndBored@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Baseless accusation. China is by and large compliant with WTO rulings. From the mouth of the libertarian Cato Institute

Select highlights

China has a relatively strong record of compliance in the complaints that have been brought against it so far.

From 2004 to 2018, 41 complaints were brought against China, on 27 separate issues, or “matters” in WTO-speak—legal claims of actions inconsistent with WTO obligations, sometimes with multiple countries complaining about the same matter, resulting in more complaints than matters. During that time, China was second only to the United States in the number of complaints it faced.

Of the 27 matters litigated against China, 5 are still pending, 12 were litigated all the way through, and 10 were resolved through some kind of settlement, or not pursued after the measure was modified

In all 22 completed cases, with one exception where a complaint was not pursued, China’s response was to take some action to move toward greater market access. This was done either through an autonomous action by China, a settlement agreement, or in response to a panel or appellate ruling.

The overall picture of China’s response to WTO complaints looks very much like the situation of other governments that face such challenges.. But there are no cases where China has simply ignored rulings against it, as has happened with some other governments. For example, the United States has not complied with the WTO ruling in the cotton subsidies complaint brought by Brazil, and the European Union (EU) still does not allow hormone-treated beef to be sold there even after losing a complaint brought by Canada and the United States.

As Mark Wu, despite his reservations about the efficacy of WTO dispute settlement with respect to China, has acknowledged, thus far the WTO “has served its purpose effectively as a forum to enforce China’s trade obligations. On the numerous occasions when the WTO has ruled against China, the Chinese government has willingly complied with the judgment and usually altered its laws or regulations to comply with WTO rules.”

(own emphasis)

Classic case of 'Rules (vibes) based international order' v laws based international order. MOFCOM put out its own paper (direct link to large pdf) on this earlier this year, but I'm sure it'd be dismissed out of hand in discussions about compliance.

[-] trudge@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I cannot believe that Britain is accusing China of abusing the global trading system

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

work with us you authoritarian monsters that must be destroyed!

[-] judgeholden@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

his foreign policy has always been terrible

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

It's almost as if he's a USAmerican politician

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 33 points 1 year ago

A dystopian surveillance state... You mean like the US and UK?

Here I was thinking a dystopian surveillance state was a requirement for modernization. My bad.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ok barnie sandler time to get in the can

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago
[-] regul@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

I mean, the coal thing is concerning. We really shouldn't, as a species, be building any coal plants.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

While this is true, it's worth noting that around 30% of China's power generation is renewables as of 2021 (which I don't think includes nuclear), a number that has been steadily trending up (eg 26% in 2019), and that it is responsible for 45% of global investments in renewables. Compare that to the US which only produces 21% of its electricity from renewables as of 2021, and is the richest country on earth.

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

That's great and I hope they shut down their coal plants as fast as possible

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait but is china really building 2 coal plants per week on average tho? D:

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
196 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13462 readers
1029 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS