this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
213 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13547 readers
22 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every liberal does it too, from center right radlibs to far-right "conservatives": the most extreme right fringe liberals hate the mainstream liberals for not being bigoted enough, the mainstream libs hate the radlibs for not being cruel enough, and the radlibs hate the left for not being chauvinist enough.

Denouncing chauvinism in particular is like a liberal moral event horizon, a cardinal sin against their self-interested belief in the righteousness of the imperial hegemon that keeps the treats flowing at gunpoint.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bad take downbear its dumbass pathologising of politics

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, if anything it's simply pointing out a pathology of politics, ideological liberals simply call it "purity" and do in fact despise left-wing shifts that don't gel with their conception of optics and civility, nonsensical terms like "overton window" becoming popular are another example of this kind of mindset

That's how the cognitive dissonance actually manifests itself when certain liberals encounter positions to their left

[–] Florist@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideological liberals despise left-wing shifts because it doesn't gel with their understanding of economics and their broader political values, not because they think leftists have a better politics.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideological liberals sure, but they're a minority usually only found in academia and think tanks, if it held for most liberals they wouldn't need to come up with terms like "purity politics" or the "I'm a socialist not communist" discourse you see in progressive liberal circles, Bernie Sander never would have called himself a socialist and become popular if what you're saying was true for the majority

Left-Liberals wouldn't need to come up with clichés like "don't let PERFECT be the enemy of good", that implies these people believe there is a "perfect" and that the leftists they're arguing with hold to it, that's not a fundamental split, at least with social liberals

Frankly the majority of liberals are too uneducated to have fundamental ideological disagreements with us, they don't even understand their own ideology, they have emotional and social disagreements with us grounded in personnel material pressures, but outside the top 20% it's shallow and can be easily broken depending on where they fall in the tax bracket

[–] Florist@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

The "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" refrain was used by left-libs in the context of policy debates like Sanders' healthcare plan vs Warren's. I'd argue that while leftists and left-libs agree on many policies, the differences in what is considered feasible and acceptable (for instance in the 2020 primary, backing Sanders vs Warren) stem from a few ideological differences.

Frankly the majority of liberals are too uneducated to have fundamental ideological disagreements with us, they don't even understand their own ideology, they have emotional and social disagreements with us grounded in personnel material pressures, but outside the top 20% it's shallow and can be easily broken depending on where they fall in the tax bracket

I agree with this. The liberal that feels cognitive dissonance when encountering leftist ideas is on the road to becoming a leftist.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

It's a snarky summarization of the liberal trend to compromise on their ethics and then become proud and defensive over those compromises, and to paint doing unconscionable things as "responsible if regrettable."

I'm not talking about the blind spots they have on things like small business despots, where they just genuinely don't have the first clue how awful they are, but on big issues where it's practically a meme that "oh it's bad but there's just nothing to be done." There is a very clear understanding that just uncomfortably pushing it out of mind is a wrong and selfish thing to do, but they do it anyways and then try to build justifications for it.