this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
456 points (82.0% liked)

Memes

46131 readers
1994 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Who told you not to trust anything the US said?

This is meme is for people who are incapable of forming their own thoughts but have been told they are, aka, tools of propaganda.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Who told you not to trust anything the US said?

Living in the US is sufficient cause to distrust its government.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Being educated is a sufficient cause to distrust all governments.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Idk I like it when the proletariat is able to dictate the course of society

Also your reply contradicts your statement that I first replied to.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all.

Someone told you not to trust either. Presumable not the same person, presumable American government told you not to trust China but that begs then question who told you not to trust the American government.

Further the meme implies one should trust the Chinese government presumably because an untrustworthy source told you not to which is a mentally stunted view.

Not being trapped under the direct influence of the Chinese government, there are clearly many of reasons not to trust that government either.

There is no reason to trust any government. A basic understanding of history should make it clear that this is true of any government that has ever existed.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

who told you not to trust the American government.

You don't have to be told not to trust it. Even deluded Chuds who guzzle US corporate propaganda all day don't trust it.

Further the meme implies one should trust the Chinese government presumably because an untrustworthy source told you not to which is a mentally stunted view.

No, the meme implies that your distrust isn't justified, not that trust is justified.

Not being trapped under the direct influence of the Chinese government, there are clearly many of reasons not to trust that government either.

Okay, have you talked to any recent(as in the last 10 years) immigrants from China who don't make way over the median US income? Or hell, earlier immigrants mostly only complain about the liberalization period under Deng.

There is no reason to trust any government. A basic understanding of history should make it clear that this is true of any government that has ever existed

This doesn't really acknowledge the class character of the state.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why would immigrants be trusted source?

People have personal biases, good and bad. People have confirmation bias. It sounds like the immigrants biases have confirmed your biases.

Even if I were to ignore all of that, your experience is an anecdotal data point for me so my opinion that no government should be trust remains.

Given that I'm not attempting to replicate or advocate for any specific form of government this seems prudent.

For anyone still reading and is really bored, my personal belief is that the only path forward is an society that is governed by immutable mathematical agreements.

It's hard to describe what I have in mind in a comment as there are many interacting pieces that together create a system that requires no government, no leaders, no fake money and no ambiguity.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

Because immigrants are already biased due to having to leave, and they're still generally normal about China.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The government that actively tries to censor elements of news from their citizens. Yeah buddy, sure thing.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I said

"Living in the US is sufficient cause to distrust its government."

You replied:

"I can say the same for China"

I replied:

"Except you literally can’t." Meaning you don't live in China so you can't make the claim with similar level of authority

And then you made the comment I replied to, and I don't see at all how it is connected to the line of conversation.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I can't because i don't live in China, but you understand the point of my argument yet choose to play semantics. It's fine

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

No, you said something that didn't make sense.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Saying that the Chinese government censors news from their citizens and attempts to spread propaganda about themselves to the outside world doesn't make sense to you?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The point is you're making an unsourced claim which doesn't align with the topic of conversation.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sucking up to the Chinese like a true tankie. Intellectualism is being able to admit that both the Chinese and US governments are bad actors

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

True intellectualism is doing proper investigation before speaking. How many ordinary Chinese people have you talked to? Have you visited China?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think i need to have done any of those things to make assertions about China. Saying that China doesn't engage in propaganda spreading and censorship is peak naivety. You know you can be a communist while also criticizing its model example right?

Hell, I've conversed with some of the most ardent communists on here, and even they concede China engages in censorship and propaganda spreading

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Saying that they do propaganda and censorship as like a "you can't trust them" justification is ridiculous though. Literally all states do those things, and non-state solutions don't work, as has been repeatedly demonstrated.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If that's your stance, then i can also say the same thing about the US:

"Saying the US does propaganda and censorship as like a 'you can't trust them' justification is ridiculous though".

That's your argument now used to support my stance.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I never made that argument though. Are you here to shadowbox or talk?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You never outlined why you think the US is untrustworthy. I am however saying that regardless of the facts, China is just as untrustworthy if not more so.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

I am however saying that regardless of the facts

That's nice, have a good day!

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Your stance seems to be based only on vibes so 🤷

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I have a brain, you know.