this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
472 points (81.4% liked)

Memes

46142 readers
2192 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I said

"Living in the US is sufficient cause to distrust its government."

You replied:

"I can say the same for China"

I replied:

"Except you literally can’t." Meaning you don't live in China so you can't make the claim with similar level of authority

And then you made the comment I replied to, and I don't see at all how it is connected to the line of conversation.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I can't because i don't live in China, but you understand the point of my argument yet choose to play semantics. It's fine

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

No, you said something that didn't make sense.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Saying that the Chinese government censors news from their citizens and attempts to spread propaganda about themselves to the outside world doesn't make sense to you?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The point is you're making an unsourced claim which doesn't align with the topic of conversation.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sucking up to the Chinese like a true tankie. Intellectualism is being able to admit that both the Chinese and US governments are bad actors

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

True intellectualism is doing proper investigation before speaking. How many ordinary Chinese people have you talked to? Have you visited China?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think i need to have done any of those things to make assertions about China. Saying that China doesn't engage in propaganda spreading and censorship is peak naivety. You know you can be a communist while also criticizing its model example right?

Hell, I've conversed with some of the most ardent communists on here, and even they concede China engages in censorship and propaganda spreading

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Saying that they do propaganda and censorship as like a "you can't trust them" justification is ridiculous though. Literally all states do those things, and non-state solutions don't work, as has been repeatedly demonstrated.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If that's your stance, then i can also say the same thing about the US:

"Saying the US does propaganda and censorship as like a 'you can't trust them' justification is ridiculous though".

That's your argument now used to support my stance.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I never made that argument though. Are you here to shadowbox or talk?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You never outlined why you think the US is untrustworthy. I am however saying that regardless of the facts, China is just as untrustworthy if not more so.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

I am however saying that regardless of the facts

That's nice, have a good day!

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Your stance seems to be based only on vibes so 🤷