okay, perhaps we are both scattered
so I will answer their question
it is wrong to perform sexual acts on an animal. Because it is wrong to have sex outside of your zone of sexual interest. Should a fox fuck a porcupine? They eat it so what else is different? Silly logic for vulgar ideology, in my opinion.
I don't see a single person defending that at all, even the banned dude.
So intention means nothing? You have jumped from vulgar ideology to vulgar materialism.
These are extremely online arguments. And using parallels that just don't match. Again, find an argument worth having.
What? When did I do that? When did I even state any logic at all? I asked someone to explain their logic.
Do you not believe that? we are vegans.
you are now dodging your own logic, interesting
When did I say any of that, I was just asking for an improvement in arguing methods. Relying on nothing but vulgar ideology does nothing for you. This isn't a marxist debate, this is some strange superiority complex induced vibes session.
Yes you are correct in the main opinion of veganism, but you have obviously not found the finer details.
You should probably close this post, it seems to be causing a fuss
White people don't get to have opinions on that of natives, you don't deserve it anymore. Im begging to think that veganism isn't a normal topic here, but some constant struggle to maintain.
Im sorry but this also reeks of the reddit suicide help thing. This isn't very good for arguing.
if we are going to equate animals and humans in your logic...
Having sex with an animal is as bad as incest, arguing there is no material reason for being against bestiality would also mean there is no reason against incest as a person who has sexual inclinations.
this argument makes no sense at all, it rests upon strange things you proposed happening, and an assumption of the result
find a better argument
watch she-ra instead
Do you often hide like this, behind a phrase critique or emojis, or is this a special sort of backtracking