Ginja

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Ginja@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah 10,000 years ago they were “immigrants”, back when no one lived on this island.

 

Almost nine million people have headed across the border since Ms Harris became vice-president and was tasked with tackling the “root causes” of illegal immigration from Central America more than three years ago.

[–] Ginja@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

YDI. You went into an explicitly pro-leftist comm to spread anti-leftist perspectives. They literally have site wide rules against this.

[–] Ginja@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And in regards to that I had already had prior discussions with mods in both World and News and we came to an understanding on what is acceptable and what isn't.

None of that justifies deliberately incorrectly labeling a news article an opinion piece, removing the post, and citing posting opinion pieces as a reason for a ban. It's completely bogus.

[–] Ginja@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Right and did I ever post an opinion piece? Is a clickbaity title misinformation?

You're all so quick to focus on something unrelated to the actual issue which is the lyings for the reason of those removals.

 

reason: Rule 3 - No opinion articles

This is the article, as you can see it is very clearly a news article about a current event and not at all an opinion article.

reason: Misinformation. Two parliament victories out of 650 members is NOT a nightmare for the opposition.

It's a clickbaity title at worst, b ut it is not misinformation. A party losing a swing seat is not a good sign, especially considering Starmers growing unpopularity. This ban was purely a mods opinion, there was no 'misinformation'.

reason: Multiple posting rule violations, especially opinion and misinformation articles. Please read the rules in the sidebar in future.

The mod used these two lies to justify a ban from the community. What point is reading the rules in the sidebar meant to serve if they're not legitimately being enforced?

[–] Ginja@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago

Thinking about how people trying to blame white men for this don't realize how they're causing exactly this problem.

"It's all your vote"
"Why aren't you supporting us?"
"It's all your vote"

People seriously think this is going to get those who feel that way to come around to them? Honey not vinegar.

view more: next ›