this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
94 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2428 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

There isn't even a cultural rationale for the slaughter.

Such a shame for what is generally known as a "green" country.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is bullshit. Can I have a license to hunt and kill 128 U.S. politicians please? They're not as smart or empathetic as whales.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do US politicians have to do with Iceland issuing the permits to an Icelandic company?

[–] Leg@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

"If this is a choice that can be made, please allow me to make a similar, arguably more humane choice."

It's not that complicated choom.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Even beyond the moral arguments, it’s just stupid. I went to Iceland last summer and I don’t know what 100 fin whales are worth but I guarantee just the people on the two boats I went whale watching on spent more money than Japanese whale meat fetishists. And that was only two boats from two companies. There were dozens of boats going out from Reykjavik and Húsavík every day, at least during the high season.

Minke whales aren’t endangered but even that hunt creates bad publicity for the country and probably harms the tourism industry. If you have bad luck on your whale watching day, you’ll still see a few minke whales and come away happy. It was mostly families with kids and the kids were stoked to spot any whale.

I get making exceptions for indigenous people in the Canadian Arctic or wherever but they have a cultural tradition, harvest like 4 whales a year, and use the meat and blubber themselves. But from what I read on my trip and was told by the guides, Icelanders didn’t even eat whale meat unless the whale beached themselves. It wasn’t some key cultural tradition.

Whalers were literally the oil companies of the 1800’s. I say “Fuck” to them just as much as I say “Fuck” to Exxon, Chevron, Aramco, et al.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pretty interesting stuff. About 100 whales per year are hunted, but 2023 had over double the average since whale hunting resumed in 2006.

There was a 4 year hiatus until COVID hit, then tourism slumped and the hunters resumed. Now that tourism is up, hunters are being shunned again. Its roughly 150 people that would need new work, and could easily transition to whale tourism (lawl).

The Icelandic whalers say its only a small percentage of the estimated 30,000 whales that pass through, so its nbd.

These hunters account for roughly 3% of all whales hunted worldwide, raking in about $15m a year.

More info here: https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/iceland-whaling-tourism/index.html

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I wonder if we could get a license to hunt whale hunters and how much that could bring a year? I’d jump at the opportunity to hunt a toxic invasive species like that.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Approved. Happy hunting.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

5 per year. It's such a small percentage of 150, it's nbd.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Animal rights groups say that while the number is significantly lower than in previous years, the decision to allow the practice to continue is inhumane and disappointing.

was given a license to hunt 128 fin whales in Icelandic waters and parts of Greenland and the Faroe Islands during the 2024 season, which typically runs from June to August.

The quota was half that of 2023, when the Icelandic government allowed for the hunting of 264 fin whales, according to the nonprofit organization International Fund for Animal Welfare.

“Today’s announcement represents a significant reduction in the quota and the duration of the hunt,” said Patrick Ramage, the group’s director.

Iceland’s government temporarily suspended the commercial hunting of fin whales last year on animal welfare grounds.

The Icelandic Food and Veterinary Authority estimated in a May 2023 report that 67% of the 58 whales caught by boats it monitored died or lost consciousness quickly or immediately.


The original article contains 399 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] CerealHunter4xcr4k 1 points 5 months ago

Some seem familiar

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Can someone explain why people care more about this than the killing of other animals?

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People can care about multiple things.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because cows as a genus aren't in danger of being wiped out.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Not talking about the artificially created species, that's a separate issue. More things like overfishing. And hunting of other species that are endangered but not as cute and lovable.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Overfishing is far less likely to wipe out an entire genus and what endangered other species are you talking about?

All cetateans are being wiped out. Not just one species of whale.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Overfishing is horrific, but people get up-in-arms about whales because cetaceans are basically people. Think of the dumbest human you know: they’re about as smart as a typical whale.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Octopuses are much smarter and people eat those too.

Edit: can I just correct myself. I now think we shouldn't use perceived intelligence as a measure of how much ethical consideration someone or something deserves, that gets reeeeally gross really fast

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well, maybe they shouldn’t.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

No, go ahead and eat the octopuses. It's us squid you guys should be worried about.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yet there's no posts in my news feed about how they're being fished, let alone comments from people upset about it. Maybe we should care more about all animals?

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe we should.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Octopuses are not much smarter than whales. What are you talking about?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Name an endangered animal that most people are OK with hunting.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You...you think cows are an "artificially created species?"

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You think that farm cattle exist as a wild animal?

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I have decided this issue is not important and warrants no consideration, because there are other issues in the world.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yes, it's actually quite simple to answer your simple question because there are so many simple reasons that are simple to understand.

  1. People also care more about eating dogs than other animals. Similar thing here with whales acting more human-like than animals we eat.

  2. Every species of whale is at risk of becoming endangered or extinct. Nearly every other animal that humans are OK with killing aren't in this much danger. Nearly every animal that is endangered gets people to care more about killing them than other animals.

  3. Whales are giant, peaceful creatures (outside of some orcas that are just dicks). People like large animals, like tigers and bears and elephants, but this is a large thing that is also harmless.

  4. Whales are intelligent and show signs of culture, society, memory, and strong feelings.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

outside of some orcas that are just dicks

That's part of their charm!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

And language and naming each other

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Man Id like to say some things in response of youd have acted like you're open for a normal adult discussion, but I just can't deal with this level of condescension. Please be nicer to people who did nothing to hurt you

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I responded that way because you were "just asking questions." It was a gotcha question that you either already knew the answer to (which is why I answered the way I did, because how could a person not know those answers?), or wouldn't believe the answer to even if it was explained simply and rationally.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I was trying to open a discussion and maybe get a person or two to get to question some things. Don't think that's a good reason to be mean. And fwiw I still don't understand WHY a person cares more about a dog than a pig.