this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
929 points (97.4% liked)

Comics

5870 readers
74 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 256 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

Why are people so intent on this meme?

Bruce Wayne is literally the kind of .1%er that can only live in fiction: an actual good one, that uses his wealth ethically in all the ways no one with that degree of wealth would ever do in the real world.

Not unlike how Batman is the ideal fantasy vigilante taking the law into their own hands (i.e. uncorruptible, unbiased, and uncompromising in his ethics), Bruce Wayne is the ideal fantasy billionaire that isn't a drain on humanity.

Neither are realistic, neither exist in real life, and that's the whole damn point. It's aspirational and escapist.

It's the reason why Lex Luthor is a villain and Bruce Wayne isn't.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

People are exactly as intent on imagining Batman as a real world evil billionaire, as they are on imagining Elon Musk as a comic book superhero billionaire.

A lot of people consuming superhero media are kids who don't know how the world works. They're learning about the real world from paying attention to the mundane parts of comics and movies. I learned what an insurance agent is from watching The Incredibles. Most kids these days know what a Walkman is because of GOTG.

Kids know Batman isn't real because they don't see anyone talking about real batman in real life. But they hear grownups saying billionaires have their best interests at heart, so they don't question Bruce Wayne.

If your argument is we can have any unreasonable myth we want in comics, why not have Aryan Man, the genetically perfect superhero created by white supremacist eugenics? Batman is a problematic myth on par with Aryan Man.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He was trying to save his love by freezing everything and she wanted plants to become the dominant lifeform on the planet. So yes, we're rooting for the billionaire that has a better adjusted moral compass than those two yahoos.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thats just billionaire propaganda.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] John_CalebBradberton@lemmy.world 153 points 5 months ago (7 children)

As I get older, the more I feel like Batman is billionaire propaganda. Like I get that it's fiction. But they want us to root for the billionaire and that fucking annoys me.

[–] kralk@lemm.ee 66 points 5 months ago

This is the subtext of the Nolan trilogy. Batman makes everything worse and literally everyone tells him that to his face, but he doesn't listen due to belief in his own exceptionalism. The only good thing he ever does is at the end of the third movie he fucks off forever.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (6 children)

My man, if every billionaire had the ethics and morals of batman we'd be a much better place.

Not everything in life is a conspiracy theory. Him being a billionaire is a cool concept precisely because most billionaires are assholes. Not to mention it's the only way he could afford all his gadgets.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EndHD@lemm.ee 39 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I felt they were using the fact that Batman is an orphan, and being a billionaire is an excuse to explain how he can fund his... hobby?

But I could see the billionaire propaganda aspect as well. I guess it depends on the author's intent.

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I definitely doubt the average comic author is pro billionaire. I think having an absurdly rich protagonist is just interesting for plot, not just does it easily justify the funding, but it easily generates a lot of plot hooks.

Growing up, I absolutely loved Peter Parker as just being the average broke kid, but I was never excited by the plot that generated that was largely school drama or conversations in small apartments.

On the other hand, there are plenty of cool things that Bruce Wayne gets to do. Sometimes he blends in with high society functions and you get an almost James Bond style investigation and sometimes you capture that Dracula style recluse skulking in his enormous manor, and both of those are very evocative even before you consider how it funds his heroics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's right-wing propaganda in general.

Who's the hero? One of the richest men in the city.

Who are his allies? The cops.

Who are the enemies?

  • An immigrant who wears a mask
  • A psychiatrist
  • A psychologist
  • A female environmentalist
  • A male environmentalist

What happens when his enemies are defeated? They are sent to a mental hospital... a mental hospital that is falling apart and chronically underfunded. That leads to them escaping, giving Batman another excuse to go beat them up.

If Mr. Wayne is a billionaire and very influential in city politics, the way they always portray him, shouldn't he be advocating tax increases on the wealthy, and using that money to fix up the city... or at the very minimum to fix up Gotham Asylum?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Come to think of it, growing up I remember thinking of certain scenes, like he goes to temples to meditate, "to find himself" or "fight his demons" or whatever, or joining fight club-style events with randos, again "to find himself" or for the fun of it, who knows - and even then I was thinking "damn, I guess it's good to have that much money to act like a clueless brat!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Most superheroes are built on the idea that the world is unjust. The people who acquire power often do so through sheer chance rather than any merit of their own, but it's still their responsibility to use that power ethically, even if society fundamentally isn't built for people like them and they have to adopt a secret identity to have any chance of a normal life.

Batman's different. He was born with a great deal of wealth and power, sure, but then he took it upon himself to acquire even more power and put himself even higher above the people around him. He's exactly who society is built for, but he wears a mask anyway to shield himself from accountability.

Somehow, we're supposed to think of him as a hero.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 16 points 5 months ago

Nah it's just an excuse for where his character gets his cool toys.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 126 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Does killing the billionaire solve anything though? The system will just put some other stooge in his position instead. Systemic change is the only way to solve this.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Gotta play dominos with them. Everytime one pops up- knock em dead. I mean down. Wink wink.

[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

1st. That's not dominoes, that's whack-a-mole

2nd. Hell yeah, let me grab me mallet

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean yeah if every CEO or VP or whatever who doesn't agree to immediately addressing climate change gets dead, then you'll probably be left with a leadership that is willing to address climate change. In the comics, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

It's the third rule of Anarchy Camp: If you see someone taking charge you're expected to beat them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Poison ivy would argue we don’t have time for systemic change. She’s doing what is in her power to do. She’d probably say that if your potted fern is droopy, it needs to be in the sun. But if you can’t afford a place with sun, maybe you need to do what you can now, and get a grow light.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

She’s doing what is in her power to do.

...but her actions don't actually achieve anything other than fulfilling some sort of revenge/punishment fantasy.

The billionaire isn't personally responsible for the emissions, and the companies will continue to operate without him. If we're not talking systemic change (i.e. government-mandated, I guess?), then she needs to either target the businesses/facilities/supply chains directly, or convince the billionaire (or someone else with power in the companies) to change things.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

Well if they can't convince the billionaire, maybe she can convince whoever inherits the billionaire's ownership. If not, there's always the next in line.

Historically this has had mixed results

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How is the guy emitting a shit ton of emissions and being in charge of so many companies that emit even more emissions not responsible?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

after the 15th or so killed in a 6 month period things might start changing. Maybe.

One way to find out.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is what we are taught.
But what we want is to change the system. And those specific people of that specific class are what stands in the way of many/all.

Tl;dr: Ivy is a hero, the hero we need.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Have you ever heard of Death Note? I think you might like it.

[–] Sordid@beehaw.org 17 points 5 months ago

I mean... if you play whack-a-mole long enough, eventually they'll get the message.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In that condition she could probably have convinced him to "legally" deed all his properties to her. (She would need to be able to enthrall everyone in the room when it happens, otherwise witnesses will testify he wasn't of sound mind, but that seems like something she could solve.)

It gets complicated after that, though, lots of shareholder suits if she does anything too drastic. Maybe she converts all those assets into investments in renewable energy, which would keep shareholders off her back.

Then she only has to deal with assassin squads sent by the rest of the oil stakeholders but, again, that seems like a problem she could solve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darthsid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

We can sure start with that

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 59 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I don't think killing him will solve anything. It just changes the owners.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Killing the first one probably won't any more than killing a single mouse doesn't stop an infestation, but once the mice realize that you got a couple of cats they will find the exit.

That's why you need to put traps by the exit too, the mice know too much and might potentially regroup to return with better tactics. You've got to get them all in one swift purge.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No but it might make the new owners think a bit.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] migo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago

The thing is that we've gone through multiple generations of new owners each thinking a bit more than the last. Now they know how to appear decent while continuing to exploit earth, humans and other animals.

And people keep voting for their puppets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I never understood this... Poison ivy isn't a misunderstood anti-hero, she's a villain. She's not a villain because she wants to save the world from pollution or climate change.

She's a villain because she's a mass-murderer and terrorist.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 58 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Also, Batman isn't opposed to her environmentalism, and a ton of his rogues' gallery are rich assholes. A situation like this would be likely to end in Batman stopping Poison Ivy and sending her to Arkham, but also stopping the billionaire's plans through destroying his project, exposing his plans, finding a reason to send him to jail, etc. It very much might involve kicking the shit out of a billionaire. More or less radical depending on who's writing that story.

And really, not to be a wet blanket, but Batman's been written by tons of people over nearly a century. Depictions of him and his surrounding characters are going to vary. Poison Ivy tends to be more of an antihero nowadays as her cause has only gotten more sympathetic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Poison ivy isn't a misunderstood anti-hero, she's a villain.

Recent comics have changed her from outright villain to eco-friendly Punisher as far as I know.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago

And more will die this year from record high heats than batman could ever save

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 28 points 5 months ago

He throws great parties! He loves beautiful women, and many of them are on the younger side.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A Poison Ivy vs Lex Luthor story could be pretty cool

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carmanut@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] HogsTooth@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί