this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
929 points (97.4% liked)

Comics

5870 readers
74 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

She’s doing what is in her power to do.

...but her actions don't actually achieve anything other than fulfilling some sort of revenge/punishment fantasy.

The billionaire isn't personally responsible for the emissions, and the companies will continue to operate without him. If we're not talking systemic change (i.e. government-mandated, I guess?), then she needs to either target the businesses/facilities/supply chains directly, or convince the billionaire (or someone else with power in the companies) to change things.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Incredibles movies are even better examples, IMO.

Edit: by the way, this part of that video seems like a nice rebuttal to link in threads where pearl-clutchers bitch and moan about "disruptive" protests.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

Well if they can't convince the billionaire, maybe she can convince whoever inherits the billionaire's ownership. If not, there's always the next in line.

Historically this has had mixed results

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is the guy emitting a shit ton of emissions and being in charge of so many companies that emit even more emissions not responsible?

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He's not directly responsible - removing him from the equation doesn't change anything. It's not like he's a machine and turning him off stops the emission. The companies will still run and nothing will have actually improved.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Habe you looked into the lifestyle billionaires live and how mich emission they produce compared to a normal guy?

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, and compared to the companies they run, even their emissions are completely negligible. Individual action will not fix our climate crisis, regardless of who does it. Systemic change is the only option that has the possibility of a statistically-useful effect.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 5 months ago

Couldn't be the one directly responsible for it, but he for sure is the one ripping all the benefits and paying none of its costs.