197

Smh how can a black American support Mao over the Tibebetan slave owners?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 87 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's that wild. In middle school I was taught that Malcolm X was evil and making things worse for black people because he wasn't peaceful and civil like MLK. That's total and complete bullshit, as I've come to learn, but that's the amerikkkan education system for you

[-] commiecapybara@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I heard the same thing. We also had a history textbook that declared the 'most oppressive states in the world' were Vietnam and Laos.

EDIT: Later editions of the book added Afghanistan, and then Iraq, to the list of oppressive states.

[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

It’s weird how we never even learned about Laos or Cambodia lol, especially since they could’ve spin Vietnamese communism as being pro Pol Pot and no kid would challenge it

[-] Tomboys_are_Cute@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

wtf-am-i-reading thats rediculous, how could they possibly spin that?

[-] commiecapybara@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

It was something along the lines of "the evil violent northern commies tried to disrupt the peaceful democratic south by attacking American ships and invading". Also a bunch of pro-colonialist propaganda. It was used in a lot of schools in America. Luna Oi actually reviewed the book, and I had forgotten how bad it was until she did. I can't seem to find the video on her channel, though.

[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

That’s funny. Maybe it’s because I don’t live in a red state or tusk town, but I was taught the Americans fired upon a Vietnamese ship and lied about the circumstances when the Vietnamese fired back

[-] commiecapybara@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, that's the truth of what happened, obviously, but the curriculum was still pushing the narrative that the Vietnamese people were the aggressors. I should note that this was back in 2001-2004 before the sanctions against Vietnam were lifted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sator_is_Tense@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Later editions of the book added Afghanistan, and then Iraq, to the list of oppressive states

michael-laugh joker-amerikkklap what a quality fuckin education

[-] commiecapybara@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

I remember when we received the 'updated' versions and that was literally all that was changed

[-] Red_Eclipse@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

Was given his biographical book to read in high school. To my rural conservative upbringing he certainly did seem "extreme" and he was "wrong" to hate white people and call them devils, but I couldn't help but feel if I was in his shoes, and saw what he saw, and how he was treated - I would hate white people too. I wouldn't want to be "civil" either. And I might even want to use violence. And so, it was another step on my leftward journey.

[-] Pelicanen@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

One thing that's interesting to note (at least for me) is that Malcolm X became much softer and more inclusive later in life while MLK seemed to have become more hardened and cynical with age.

[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 75 points 1 year ago

Is Hampton existed today liberals would praise the FBI for killing a kremlin agent

[-] MCU_H8ER2@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Hampton has basically been erased from mainstream US history.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

There was a great movie about him called Judas and the Black Messiah that came out just a couple of years ago. It was relatively obscure though and didn't even make back half its budget in ticket sales.

[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

The director was accused of being a lib, but based on his tweets, seems like he was forced to change things to placate the studio. One of the changes was including Jay Z in the soundtrack lol

[-] MCU_H8ER2@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I actually want to watch that. I'll check it out.

[-] trudge@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

That infuriates me on two levels because it's absolutely true. Liberals wouldn't know which side of the Sino-Soviet split Hampton supported.

[-] Crucible@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago

How many people would call Mandela a Russian puppet for the pro Castro/Arafat/Gaddafi speech

[-] Averagemaoist@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

Malcolm X was never really rehabilitated. People hated him when he was alive and they still hate now that he's dead. The best you can get about him is people saying he was "complicated".

[-] SunriseParabellum@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

funny-clown-hammer says he's inspired by fred-hampton a guy he's certainly call a tankie black nationalist if he were alive today.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

He's literally said that aCtUaLlY the Black Panthers weren't maoist but anarchist, they just didn't realize it.

He's just making shit up as he goes along

[-] SunriseParabellum@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Not the first time I've heard that argument. Funny cuz Hampton criticized anarchists for making the anti-DNC protests in Chicago disorganized.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

insert Lenin quote about revolutionaries in their day.

[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Give Malcolm X twitter, drag him into cracker discourse, and let him cook

[-] Sator_is_Tense@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

v*ush should keep comrade hampton's name out of his fucking pedo mouth

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

That's fucked up he said that considering he's spent the last year and half harassing various black radical youtubers by sending his gremlins after them

[-] CommCat@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

of course he would, it's not like libs liked Malcolm X when he was alive. At best Libs are lukewarm towards Malcolm X today, I don't think they can sanitize his history like do with most radicals.

[-] Sephitard9001@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Liberals have better opinions of George W. Bush than they do Malcom X

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same with Nelson Mandela, or any post colonial African leader.

https://hexbear.net/comment/3765077

[-] Gelamzer@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When it comes to Mandela libs give him the MLK treatment ,

but chuds seem to acknowledge his more radical side they just hate that.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

I always had a soft spot for Malcolm X, considering how loudly his actions spoke. School would show videos of police brutalizing protestors or of accounts of lynchings, then the next day get told that any attempts to fight back with more than a rousing speech were going too far. Honestly shocked I wasn't a full on communist by grade school, really.

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Don't make me post the Lenin quote

During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.

It’s just wild that even after a century he just doesn’t miss

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago
[-] axont@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Malcolm X is still labelled things that the average American finds distasteful, like radical or extremist. I don't think the average American (outside of black people) has a high opinion of him, including leftish liberals. I don't think he'll ever truly be rehabilitated in the standard American ideology like MLK. He's always gonna be polarizing like John Brown or, I don't know, Harvey Milk.

Part of his life he was a black separatist, and after that he'd continue to call for reparations for black people.

He was also incredibly cool and good and recommended black people get guns to shoot cops. When he got drafted for WW2 he told the army recruiter that he was gonna use his military assignment to organize black soldiers to "kill crackers" which is just too powerful. The man was too strong. He didn't have any illusions that black people would be able to fully integrate with American society under the current establishment. He correctly understood it's a racist, genocidal empire from top to bottom and he didn't spare any words to describe it as such.

The only people I've ever heard talking about Malcolm X in positive terms are black people and leftists who already might admire Lenin, Castro, Mao, etc. White liberals call him a racist, conservatives call him a terrorist, and leftist liberal progressives call him complicated.

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

For the tenth time, what the FUCK is a tankie?!?!?

[-] macabrett@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

it's a class with low dps, but high hp and some crowd control

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

You joke but I have literally seen someone go on a wild anti-"cultural marxist" anti-"tankie" rant over someone asking for someone to play the RPG role of tank in a game.

[-] uralsolo@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Legitimately the best class in any MMO. Piss easy to play, AND you're literally the protagonist of all of the game's content. Just try and tell me that the big DPS man is the main character when has has to follow me around everywhere.

[-] abc@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

me maining RDM in FFXIV but switching to PLD for cutscenes yea

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago
[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

two answers, both equally true:

A) someone who was in support of the ussr rolling tanks (hence 'tankie') into hungary in 1956. these people (or the original ones anyway) are mostly all dead.

B) anyone on the left of any tendency who supports existing socialist states or parties - though now it's not even that, and can only reliably be read as "leftist i don't like"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sasuke@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

anyone to the left of biden

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

the communist party of great britain got in arguments with each other over whether Khruschev was correct to invade hungary in 1956. One faction of CPGB argued that Khruschev was correct to do this, because America was funding nazi insurgents in Hungary. The other faction of CPGB argued that this was incorrect, and called the faction that supported Khruschev "tankies." This term, "Tankies" remained an obscure term that communists used when fighting each other for about 4 decades, until it was revived on the internet in the late '90s. By the early 2010s, liberals were beginning to use it against anyone who was anti-capitalist, including anarchists and social democrats. Now it pretty much is used as a slander against anyone who has broad critiques of US foreign policy.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm actually wondering, if Martin Luther King Jr. was the one who equivocated the evils of Capitalism to that of racism,

what sort of anti-capitalist rhetoric has Malcolm X said, in a quote or 2?

[-] axont@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His entire 1964 speech at the Aubudon Ballroom is great. The man knew how to talk. Take your pick from this part:

"Among Asian countries, whether they are communist, socialist — you don’t find any capitalist countries over there too much nowadays. Almost every one of the countries that has gotten independence has devised some kind of socialistic system, and this is no accident. This is another reason why I say that you and I here in America — who are looking for a job, who are looking for better housing, looking for a better education — before you start trying to be incorporated, or integrated, or disintegrated, into this capitalistic system, should look over there and find out what are the people who have gotten their freedom adopting to provide themselves with better housing and better education and better food and better clothing.

None of them are adopting the capitalistic system because they realize they can’t. You can’t operate a capitalistic system unless you are vulturistic; you have to have someone else’s blood to suck to be a capitalist. You show me a capitalist, I’ll show you a bloodsucker. He cannot be anything but a bloodsucker if he’s going to be a capitalist. He’s got to get it from somewhere other than himself, and that’s where he gets it--from somewhere or someone other than himself. So, when we look at the African continent, when we look at the trouble that’s going on between East and West, we find that the nations in Africa are developing socialistic systems to solve their problems."

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13460 readers
984 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS