this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
123 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1493 readers
154 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 113 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Sam Altman says AI is gonna need so much energy that we need to be investing in new energy strategies.

If it still takes humans doing all this extra work to get the job done, wouldn't it make more financial and ecological sense to just...

...

...pay artists a living wage to do the same fucking job instead?

We're gonna burn our planet to the ground and doom our species to extinction for this bullshit? Fuck me, maybe it's what we deserve, then.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 43 points 8 months ago

If it still takes humans doing all this extra work to get the job done, wouldn’t it make more financial and ecological sense to just…

…pay artists a living wage to do the same fucking job instead?

Someone should tell them this was an option all along before they waste any more time and resources on this.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We’re gonna burn our planet

We? Or maybe just a handful of tech bros with too much money.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, arguably, yes, but I meant more "we" as in "humanity as a whole."

Sure, plenty of us don't actually get a choice in what is happening, but outwardly, you would attribute it to the human species, even if it was only a subset of the human species. Mosquitoes and bedbugs aren't responsible for the destruction of the planet, although it would be nice to be able to blame them.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago

it's incumbent on sam altman to pretend that ai will more efficiently drain the world's money, capital and power into the hands of the ultra rich, because this is how he causes money, capital and power to drain into his hands

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Turns Out That Extremely Impressive Sora Demo

Impressive to whom, exactly? Play a game and pause that video at any random spot and tell me it looks like a movie shot.

Even after editing that scene with the fountain has completely random shadows and this... just whatever the fuck this even is

[–] self@awful.systems 30 points 8 months ago

Every Frame a Drunken Painting

[–] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

to be fair, there's still a bunch of other sora demo clips that are very impressive.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

* that haven't been individually debunked yet, just the big splashy one they publicised most heavily

[–] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think sora is good for anything or anyone other than openai making more money based on hype, but it seems pretty reasonable to me that the company that previously scraped the whole internet (violating everyones copyright) and trained one of the best text models on it, could do the same for video.

I mean, most of the clips they show have some noticable minor (or major) issues, and the "fail" examples are very obviously wrong.

I hadn't even seen the balloon head one, I only watched the clips they published when they announced it.

[–] earthquake@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately, effort does not guarantee quality, and it's worth contemplating the possibility that they violated everyone's rights just to make something irredeemably crappy.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

true, i do love the video of wolf pups intersecting and disappearing and regenerating like in a dream, or the incredibly creepy birthday one with fake humans morphing into one another and i'd love to see what sort of disturbing and content infringing stuff i could produce with it if it didn't consume a rainforest's worth of power for five seconds of video

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Did they claim the video was unedited Sora output? It doesn’t sound like they had to do all that much to the output to get what they wanted. There aren’t any AI tools right now that always output exactly what you want without any alterations, so of course they had to regenerateate clips many times and fix them up manually. They still ended up with a video that required no actual filming, and that’s impressive.

[–] self@awful.systems 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 16 points 8 months ago

putting the pro in prognostication

[–] carlitoscohones@awful.systems 20 points 7 months ago

Did they claim the video was unedited Sora output?

This is the article that I read at launch:

Has generative video’s problem with faces and hands been solved? Not quite. We still get glimpses of warped body parts. And text is still a problem (in another video, by the creative agency Native Foreign, we see a bike repair shop with the sign “Biycle Repaich”). But everything in “Air Head” is raw output from Sora. After editing together many different clips produced with the tool, Shy Kids did a bunch of post-processing to make the film look even better. They used visual effects tools to fix certain shots of the main character’s balloon face, for example.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think what they claimed “this is what real artists can do with this technology”

Which appears exactly what this video is.

[–] self@awful.systems 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

weird OpenAI neglected to mention that what the real artists were doing with the technology was spend a lot of time heavily editing and fucking rotoscoping its output to look barely passable

but the result was still uninteresting garbage that’s only barely notable if you think generative AI did it, and we’ve established that all the coherent parts of this were done (as usual) with the hard work of a team of uncredited humans

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

well, that's true from a certain point of view

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago

marketing department said it so it must be right