[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

you guys aren't gonna like to hear this, but I love the taste of boot. I love to lick every inch of the boot. god yes, every inch has to be glistening and wet. I have to make sure to get all of the gravel out of the treads. the point is I'm thorough. anyway none of you understand normal people

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

After years of sweet-talking the press, the public, and the policymakers in Congress, assuring all that OpenAI wants regulation and cares more about safety than about money, Altman is not even bothering to play games anymore. He’s showing everyone his true colors. Governor Newsom, are you seeing this? Congress, are you seeing this? World, are you seeing this?

this is so fucking funny. bro nobody but you is surprised

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 19 points 5 days ago

just heard a podcast ad for amazon prime saying it causes "involuntary deal squeals" followed by a categorization of different kinds of customer grunts and squeals according to product. not making this up

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

According to the Fed's 2022 Economic Well- Being of U.S. Households survey released Monday, some 37% of Americans lack enough money to cover a $400 emergency expense, up from 32% in 2021. That means nearly one in four consumers would have to use credit, turn to family, sell assets, or get a loan in order to cover any major unexpected cost. And when asked about non-emergency expenses, 18% of Americans said the largest expense they could cover using only their savings was under $100.

now where did I leave my hammer and sickle

28

the symbolism is 😗👌

archive link: https://archive.ph/jFO6f

33

archive link

https://archive.ph/n3Ffq

Judge Mehta’s Google decision is likely to be appealed. “Regardless of who wins or loses, this case probably has a date with the Supreme Court,” Mr. Kovacic said.

ah well

63
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sc_griffith@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

"subreddit rules. Speak pro-ai thoughts freely."

DefendingAIArt is a subreddit run by mod "Trippy-Worlds," who also runs the debate sister subreddit AIWars. Some poking around made clear that AIWars is perfectly fine with having overt Nazis around, for example a guy with heil hitler in his name who accuses others of lying because they are "spiritually jewish." So we're off to a great start.

the first thing that drew my eye was this post from a would be employer:

My hobby is making games. Every artist have spoken to regarding my current project has rejected currency in exchange for referencing Al-made images.

not really clear what the title means, but this person seems to have had a string of encounters with the most based artists of all time.

Has anyone experienced this? They see Al work and lose their mind, some even have the nads to expect to get a pay multiplier to 'compensate" for the "theft" like my surname is fucking Altman. Like, bro, I can barely afford your highly- accomplished and talented ass and would be doing it for myself if had your skillset, yet you reject my money with prejudice because pushed my shitty programmer art a bit further with a piece of software which can't even use to a fraction of its full potential? That's a greeeeeeeeaaa way to convince me to keep your artstation username out of my prompts to public models, even if believe that particular spirit of behavior should be illegal

also claims to have been called "racial and gender slurs" for using ai art and that he was "kicked out of 20 groups" and some other things. idk what to tell this guy, it legitimately does suck that wealthy people have the money to pay for lots of art and the rest of us don't

Could we Ban the "No Al" Symbol? Someone proposed an idea to me: why not gather evidence and present it to the authorities who prohibited the display of the Swastika and other hate symbols? I was impressed by this suggestion. After researching, I found out that there are organizations that can categorize it as illegal if we can show evidence of the harm it has caused. I believe we can unite people, including artists who have suffered due to false accusations by anti-Al rioters, to support this cause. If we all sign a petition, we can ban the symbol, which would prevent its misuse on platforms like DeviantArt and stop the spread of misinformation. Would you support this initiative? Would you sign to end ignorance and compel them to advocate for fair regulations for Al, ensuring that nobody has to encounter this symbol and that those who use it for malicious purposes find no refuge?Or is it just not possible? Let's discuss.

I really enjoyed browsing around this subreddit, and a big part of that was seeing how much the stigma around AI gets to people who want to use it. pouring contempt on this stuff is good for the world

the above guy would like to know what combination of buttons to press to counter the "that just sounds like stealing from artists" attack. a commenter leaps in to help and immediately impales himself:

'just block and move on' 'these are my real life friends' 'oh...'

you hate to see it. another commenter points out that well ... maybe these people just aren't your friends

'antis will always just stab you in the back'

to close out, an example of fearmongering:

So I made a post on a sub with a rule against Alart and the Auto-mod does this...I'm assuming its fearmongering right? automod: Your comments and posts are being sold by Reddit to Google to train Al. You cannot opt out.

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

lmao the disclosure is all the way down at the bottom and it's soooo small

12

This is an essay about 'village' vs 'control' techno-optimism I wrote for a class final in 2016. I was in undergrad etc etc but for 2016 I feel it had a lot of foresight, and there's still some bits here and there I haven't seen anyone else explicate. Thought some of you might be interested

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 34 points 2 months ago

we're aiming to do 1% more recycling this year 💪💪💪

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 45 points 3 months ago

headline is inaccurate and downplays the incredible potential of ai. Google Gemini tried to kill this person AND their entire family

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 41 points 3 months ago

alright well now we have the perfect response to half the people who pop in from lemmy.world

63
wow. sensible (awful.systems)
90

somehow I managed to miss this until now

archive link

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 26 points 4 months ago

if I copy a coherent sentence into my clipboard, my clipboard becomes capable of consistently making coherent statements

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 31 points 4 months ago

"due to backlash" are you literate? go read the second paragraph of the article and tell me what it says

27
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by sc_griffith@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

https://web.archive.org/web/20240517214034/https://www.404media.co/here-is-what-axons-bodycam-report-writing-ai-looks-like-draft-one/

tl;dr ai will write up officer reports used to help convict people, based on bodycam audio. of course we can expect it to display the usual features of fictionalizing, bias and diffusion of accountability

special highlight: end of the article includes a comment from the EFF, imploring municipalities not to purchase this tech. company responds with a statement pitching the product to prosecutors. make your own inference about who has control over this decision

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

plus: this aligns with my preconceptions, which feels nice

minus: the guy saying this is CEO of a company that sells supposedly ai detecting software and is therefore completely untrustworthy, because (1) his job is to say his company is as urgently needed as possible (2) his product is presumably fake which immediately classifies him as a grifter

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 29 points 5 months ago

all this is framed as "driving sales" so let's look at the concrete uses in the article

Yum’s SuperApp, a mobile app for restaurant managers to track and manage operations—Park calls it “a coach in your pocket”—is testing a generative AI boost, he said. Team members can ask the app questions like “How should I set this oven temperature?” rather than turning to training materials or tapping through an app interface.

a search function, for a manual, that can lie to you

Like its competitors, Yum is testing generative AI’s use for customers, such as voice AI for drive-through orders.

giving customers a shittier interface in order to replace workers

The company is also looking into image-recognition AI to count cars and waiting times in a drive-through, as well as digitally linked and managed kitchen appliances, Park said.

surveillance

so, nothing related to increasing sales. they emphasize that angle because it sounds productive, dynamic, aspirational - but there is no such use case for ai as of yet

12

inspired by

https://awful.systems/comment/2382662

from the link, we obtain HODL gang and versace bedouin (which might be the worst song I've ever heard period).

I would also like to add predatory capitalist feminism anthem WAGMI.

on an ideological level I would nominate the technofascist propaganda piece we appreciate power. banger tho

60

Actual framing:

Cruise wasn’t hiding the pedestrian-dragging video from regulators — it just had bad internet / An independent review of an incident in which a driverless Cruise vehicle dragged a pedestrian over 20 feet concludes the company has connectivity issues.

My expectations for journalists are low but goddamn

archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20240126195607/https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/25/24050791/cruise-pedestrian-dragging-video-driverless-report

view more: next ›

sc_griffith

joined 1 year ago