621
Don't forget to tip (lemmy.world)
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 176 points 11 months ago

Imagine if landlords decided to strike. The consequences would be....

There'd be noone to...

The land doesn't lord itself you know!

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 50 points 11 months ago

They can't strike, it's illegal. The ones that do are called slum lords and they're literally criminals.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 17 points 11 months ago

They can't strike because it's not a job.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago

Not striking per se, but if you piss them off they could start turning away the majority of applicants so they don't have to deal with society's more desperate. The corporates already do that anyways, though.

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 140 points 11 months ago

Satire is no excuse for landphobia, you're still putting out problematic content that could be taken out of context and weaponized to trigger Persons of Land. Delete this

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 63 points 11 months ago

those rentoids need to be silenced, the landphobia is so cruel and unfair

[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 11 months ago

Feudalism never died, it just rebranded

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

Geldadel (money aristocracy). It didn't even change that much. In the past their excuse was religion now it's "proficiency".

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 35 points 11 months ago

My only comment on the landlord stuff is that there are landlords that are good, but they're extremely rare. My landlord from college, whom I now consider to be a friend, and regularly keep up with, became a friend because he was an exceedingly great landlord.

He would regularly visit the property to check in, do the work around the place that needed to be done. Stuff like shoveling snow, cutting the grass, etc. He made sure everything was running correctly and there were no issues; if there was ever a problem he would address it right away and at the very least, give you a rough timeline on when things would be fixed.

You could call him 24/7 and he would drop whatever he was doing and head out to address any issue that needed immediate attention. He was lenient on payments, often foregoing first/last/security payments with little more than the commitment to pay by a certain date, which could be months into the future. We were students and sometimes our financial assistance didn't come in exactly when we needed it, and we had to argue with our financial institution to get our cheques for the semester. He provided everything included in the rent, from heat/power to internet. Rent was reasonable and often under market value for what was provided. He was less concerned about making profit and more concerned with the house paying for itself, and running smoothly.

Before anyone has the chance to comment, this guy is a unicorn. I'm damned lucky to have rented from him. By no means does he represent even a fraction of 1% of landlords. He did everything in his power to ensure we were taken care of and that's why I rented from him the entire time I was in college, and a few of my friends ended up moving into my student house over the course of my college career. I don't expect to ever find another landlord that's anywhere near his quality ever again. I've had the need to rent from others, because he doesn't really have any units that served my needs later in life (and now I have a mortgage, so never again), and the difference is dramatic. Most landlords seems to do everything in their power to avoid taking responsibility, visiting the property, or have anything happen that doesn't either sweep problems under the rug, or make it someone else's problem. They just want their money, and damn everything else.

99.9% of landlords are garbage, and they deserve every ounce of hate towards them. They've worked hard at earning that hate and they get the hate that they have earned. I recognise that my experience with this one landlord does not and should not excuse any of that loathing that others feel about landlords in general and the vast majority are not worth the oxygen that they consume.

My entire point is that it's not 100% of landlords that are shit. It's damn close to 100% but it's not. A very small fraction of a percent are actually good at what they do, and take issues seriously. They get involved in issues without hesitation and resolve problems quickly, without complaint. It is an extremely small number of them. My (now) friend who happens to also be a landlord is one such example. That being said, it's not worth it to maintain an entire industry full of shit for the few that actually do things well and provide something valuable. So I'm still in favor of burning it all down and rebuilding from scratch. Temporary/rental living has a place in society for those who will be living in an area for a small amount of time (college/university is an easy example), but on the whole, ownership should be a painless experience, and it's not. In no small part because of landlords buying up anything they can. Another contributing factor is house flippers, whom I consider to be a scourge to society, since so few of them do anything remotely correct. Many don't do things that will even stand up to moderate use and buying from a flipper often results in having to have most of the work re-done correctly within a few years.

It's a horrid part of society and should be abolished.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 11 months ago

It's the ones left with an extra property as a result of inheritance or moving in with a partner that are probably OK to rent from.

Although letting agencies are always there to bring the big landlord misery experience to smalltime landlords.

Anyone buying a third property or more should be charged 100% stamp duty.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Dunno, not all agencies are shit either. I rented an apartment for 2 years through an agency and their fee was stupid high where I live, sure, but they took care of all the issues we had, they called the technicians for reparations and if the technicians said that stuff broke because it was old or it was faulty, the landlord had to pay it. 100% of our issues were like that. When we left, the landlord returned us all the deposit the day before the agency came to check how the house was (it was clean ofc).

Iirc the landlord bought the house as a future investment for his kids, so we had the best renting experience for me at least. I live in a small european city with high prices so the experience will differ wildly from other places, even in other neighbourhoods of my city lmao

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I get what you're saying. I rented from a large organization in my former city (they own something like 60 or 70% of the highrise rental buildings in the city), and we had an excellent experience with few exceptions; but our esperience was largely due to our superintendents. They were always prompt, punctual, and attentive to anything that needed attention. That was their job, and bluntly, they did it well.

I've heard stories from other people who have rented from the same company but for different properties who have had dramatically different experiences. The difference came down to who was managing the property, not who owned it. The corporation that owned it just pushed all the responsibility onto the super, and collected their money every month, not giving a shit about anything. We were good tenants and paid promptly every month without fail, so we never had an issue. The super also did me some really big favors while we were in the process of vacating the premise. We got out on time, but barely. I called in a handful of favors to get it done, but it got done. The super was being pressured by the corp who owned the building to get us out before a specific date/time (IIRC, 5PM on the friday before the last day of the month) - however, legally, we technically had posession of the unit until 11:59 PM (23:59) on the last day of the month, because that's what we paid for.

There was some discussion on this and the super got involved, and examined the situation (we were on good terms due to our history and repoire), and knew that the companies expectations of us being out by friday at 5 wasn't going to happen. They basically ran interference to ensure we had whatever time we needed, within the confines of the law, to get the job done, and wrap up as expected. At the end of the day, we were all happy with the outcome (both the landlord and myself and SO).... though, I believe they're no longer the superintendents there, and I'm not sure if that's related or not.

Simply put, they're little more than employees. The company wants what they want, and the corporation that owns the building is a cold unfeeling bastard who can only be diciplined by major legal action (which bluntly, most people who need to rent, can't afford to go against the legal firm that the corporation literally owns).

to give some context, I work I.T. and had occasion to work for their corporate HQ (my employer got some contract work), when the moved to a new building. Through that, I got some serious insight into the company, and they have entire floors set up for legal, property management, and even a fucking bank. This corporation is their own bank, legal team, and everything. it's staggering to think how large they need to be before simply buying a bank and a law firm is cheaper than hiring an independent company to handle that. It's mind boggling.

If they were to go out of business tomorrow, I wouldn't mind though. I attribute 100% of the positives of that experience to the superintendents we had. I would have liked for them to own the building far more than that heartless corporation.

[-] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry I have to ask. Are there really landlords that expect a tip?

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is the one that just baffles me. Tipping a landlord? For what, existing?

[-] Knightfox@lemmy.one 13 points 11 months ago
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 11 months ago

Ehh I had one that said it would be nice if I did to help cover the cost of transaction fees and postage of sending me my receipt in the mail.

[-] Knightfox@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Ewww, hope that was a joke

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

So he's burdened by kindness and love?

[-] v3x@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Indness Nd Love*

[-] Fisch@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, he could have trippled rent prices but he only doubled them because of his kindness and love towards his tenants 🥰

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Holds a landlord back from being their best selves.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

The only thing landlords actually have a claim to be worried about is what's going to happen to them once their tenants are free.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

"I ain't giving you shit, I ain't paying the rent 'til I've got hot water and my toilet is fixed. I don't care, you can try to kick me out if you want to. ' Cause I'll be away, gonna be away tomorrow, I'm gonna do it right and find a place, and I will tell my slumlord to get out of my face! I get the world, you get nothing! I ain't giving a shit, I'm not paying the rent, and I will tell my slumlord to get out of my face, you ain't getting a thing from me!"

" Slumlord" - Bomb The Music Industry!

[-] jcdenton@lemy.lol 4 points 11 months ago
[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

lol poor discriminated against landlords

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
621 points (88.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26310 readers
3472 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS