this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
225 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39500 readers
2653 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Germany and France criticized U.S. President-elect Donald Trump after he refused to rule out military or economic actions to acquire Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory and part of the EU and NATO.

Germany stressed borders must not be changed by force, citing the UN Charter, while France warned against threats to EU sovereignty.

Trump defended his position on national security grounds, proposing tariffs on Denmark if it resists.

Denmark and Greenland rejected the idea, with Greenland's leader reiterating its desire for independence, not U.S. annexation.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

This little orange fuck puppet of ours is just seeing what other dictators are doing world wide and hopes to emulate. Xi wants Taiwan, Putin is getting a chunk of Ukraine, Netanyahu gets Palestine.

Our little oompa-lumpa needs Greenland to think himself an equal of these dickbags.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Putin's Sock Puppet is using the same excuse as his Moscow bosses for invading Ukraine.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Chinese and Russian astroturfing is paying dividends so early. So much value I'm sure they will 10x the investment for the next election.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Chump change compared to what his buddies will trap this round.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

"Shmermany and Shmance shmiticize nyahh nyaa..."

I'm sick and tired of reading this kind of empty, pointless "news". STOP ENTERTAINING HIS BULLSHIT. It doesn't warrant public debate. Let him know via diplomatic channels it's not gonna happen but don't let him hog the public's attention.

Same with other clowns in the public eye. Don't give them the attention. Point out what's really happening and what people can do about it instead.

You're helping them turn politics into high school drama. Gah. We really are getting stupider as a species.

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey remember the claims that nobody respected us under President Biden?

They did. They trusted and collaborated with us. So much for that for a while.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For Trump, others 'respect' is groveling and subservience.

Trust and collaboration are never what he wants. That leaves room for him to not get his way.

What he fails to grasp is that people can act like they're subservient to you while making you a useful idiot, especially when you're as easily manipulated as he is.

And this is precisely why world leaders and business leaders are lining up to kiss his ring. Not out of fear, but because they want something and they know how to get it with him.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Christ. We've got at least four more years of this boring bullshit unless the fat orange cunt dies. We can but hope.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Lol they're never gonna relinquish power. Say goodbye to the republic, on jan20th we start what's next. All hail our new Muppet overlords.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

He would need to die before inauguration or we get Vance.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was hoping that he would become too senile to lead before that but now I'm realizing it won't be noticeable.

[–] Schnabeltierplaisir@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago

Have you heard his incoherent ramblings?! He already was too senile to lead in 2016. It's not like that prevented Americans from electing him the first time..

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

After reading the first part I said how would anyone notice haha

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well he could drop sooner and be replaced by J D Vance.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If he dies before the inauguration, the presidency goes to the person who finished second, not his VP.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

It might have been wishful thinking or a hallucination.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Ah I see. He wants to start a war with NATO so that Russia can help and invade more of Europe.

Probably

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Hey, Americans, if your government starts invading Panama, Greenland, Canada, etc, what are you going to do about it?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Swallow whatever propaganda is set in front of them like they always fucking do, the credulous numptys.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

Post memes on the internet.

[–] Schnabeltierplaisir@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago

They'll fall in line..

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's a good thing that they have all those guns to fight tyranny with.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Hey, they'll fight whomever the Great Leader tells them is the tyrant!

(I believe the tyrant is currently trans people, poor immigrants, independent women and non-assholes.)

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Protest. But we are owned by corporations and the wealthy. So I doubt it will do much.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I take issue with comparing the success rate of violent revolutions to non-violent ones. I think that violent revolutions happen when non-violent revolutions are impossible or unfeasible. The fact that they have less success doesn't mean much when trying to do a non-violent revolution would likely have no chance of success.

Historical circumstances will vary and so no single strategy is better for all cases.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

I think one of the major issues we have is we are so spread out. It's not like a majority of us can drive a few hours and get to DC to protest. It's a days drive from where I am at.

Our politicians don't feel the pressure they should.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Sit it out in protest?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

The second trump presidency is like an extinction level event for the country. In four years see if there is anything left. In the meantime yeah the country will be torn apart.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It seems half of the country wants it, and the other half can't get their act together enough to turn up and vote. So...

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Vote? There is no more vote. Get that shit out of your head. If you ever want to vote again, watch American idol.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

We really are Axis now. This guy actually wants to just start invading other nations.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump seems to have become even more prone to picking confrontations.

Now, as for Greenland... I'm fairly sure that the Inuit understand their possible paths.

Denmark -> is a foreign power, but the weakest and most friendly foreign power that is available. If someone wants a career abroad, via Denmark it's possible to access the EU. As part of Denmark, one gets a stable democracy with decent health and social security guarantees, and decent workers' rights.

The US is not a comparable replacement. It's a damaged democracy (part oligarchy) with a problematic electoral system that produces a two-party political landscape. The landscape is currently very polarized. The US is arguably nearing a constitutional crisis due to Trump, the first felon president. In almost every comparison, the US scores high on violence and low on social / medical guarantees - it's the country where cops shoot citizens and citizens shoot health insurance bosses. It has nothing appreciable to offer in terms of workers' rights.

If I were a politician in Greenland, I would offer to join the US - on the condition that Trump successfully commits seppuku. A decent president should be willing to lay his life down for such a big territorial gain. :)

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Okay...

I'm aware I'm going way out on thin ice with this but I have to ask:

Isn't there a joint military chief staff that actually advises and vetoes military operations on that country?

if my numbers don't fail me:

  • he threatened Panama
  • he threatened Canada
  • he has an off leash whatever threatening the UK
  • he threatened Greenland, Denmark and, by extension, the entire EU

That is at least 5 potential theaters of war, some of which are not exactly helpless punching bags, with the potential to drain millions of lives.

Isn't there a military cabinet to say: $no, those are allies and we will not engage in warfare with allied nations"?

In extreme scenarios, military forces are expected to houst unfit heads of state. Don't the US armed forces have the balls for it?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

You forgot mexico.

[–] schteph@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As much as I understand us military, they are required to follow all orders (like any military, really) except orders that are illegal.

So, if Trump ordered an invasion of Greenland, the military should refuse that order, unless that order also comes with an act of congress declaring war on Greenland. However, Nixon bombed Cambodia without a declaration of war, so I don't know.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Declarations of war have been a bit passé these last few decades. You can bypass a lot of tedious paperwork by calling it a fight against terrorism, a defense of liberty, a peacekeeping mission, or just a special military operation. If Trump's USA invades us up here in Canada you'll be told we're being liberated from the dictatorship of middle-of-the-road electoral politics and an oppressive woke agenda of tolerance. And if we fight back we'll be an insurgent threat to be neutralised in the cause of freedom. Only when we're either dead from bullets or lack of healthcare, or wearing the straightjacket of corporatist Christofascism, will we be truly free.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Not really.

In my country, military personnel are sworn to uphold the constitution and to the flag.

Back 2012 or something, we had a very unpopular government (we were under IMF management) that rolled over with every single demand the IMF put on the table and then some. The government attempted time after time to pass laws that were blatantly against our constitution and, at some point, in very veilled way, threatned to order the military to supress civil demonstration (mostly peaceful).

The military openly warned against such ideas and remembered the government the military exist to defend the country, its constitution, rule of law and its people, not the political class.

There was a not so small risk of a repeated coup.

So, all of this to say: armed forces serve the country, not politics.

You can't make this shit up.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can they also please discourage him from invading Canada, Mexico, Panama and (if he does what Musk wants) the UK? Because it's feeling a bit like living next door to Hitler up here.

[–] wisely@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's unfortunately looking like Canada is going to need nukes. Plus a ban on X, misinformation and Musk's money.

Probably should set up an agency like Russia and China did but to push out positive, pro democracy, fact based propaganda.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Unfortunately we're about to elect a Conservative government with the same reactionary social and religious agenda, the same racism, and the same hatred of public services and love of privatization as the Republicans, who will welcome "closer ties" with the USA. I absolutely do not trust them not to sell Canada out at the first opportunity.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Will they also be donating a cool million to his inauguration though? They aren't gonna get very far with him if they didn't 😬

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should just offer to trade it for Florida.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who wants Florida? It'll be under water in a few years, and until then it's full of people who thought DeSantis was a good idea.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That’s sorta the joke.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I'll just point out again that the military force thing is a manufactured headline. Reporters at this point know that Trump isn't going to rule out military force in any situation (ruling out military force is for pussies). So any reporters can just ask him "do you rule out military force in order to___" and the answer is always no and they get the headline they want. Easier than real journalism, I guess.