this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
234 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39504 readers
1739 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Germany and France criticized U.S. President-elect Donald Trump after he refused to rule out military or economic actions to acquire Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory and part of the EU and NATO.

Germany stressed borders must not be changed by force, citing the UN Charter, while France warned against threats to EU sovereignty.

Trump defended his position on national security grounds, proposing tariffs on Denmark if it resists.

Denmark and Greenland rejected the idea, with Greenland's leader reiterating its desire for independence, not U.S. annexation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Protest. But we are owned by corporations and the wealthy. So I doubt it will do much.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I think one of the major issues we have is we are so spread out. It's not like a majority of us can drive a few hours and get to DC to protest. It's a days drive from where I am at.

Our politicians don't feel the pressure they should.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I take issue with comparing the success rate of violent revolutions to non-violent ones. I think that violent revolutions happen when non-violent revolutions are impossible or unfeasible. The fact that they have less success doesn't mean much when trying to do a non-violent revolution would likely have no chance of success.

Historical circumstances will vary and so no single strategy is better for all cases.