this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
373 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

60389 readers
3059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vader8er@pawb.social 62 points 6 days ago
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 64 points 6 days ago

my puppet is in power — everyone be nice now.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 72 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago

Free speech abolitionist, more like.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 60 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Instead of “bad” you have to say “ungood” from now on.

[–] SDK@midwest.social 10 points 6 days ago

Double plus ungood!

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Maybe if you tell me the bad news in a good way, it won't sound so bad."

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The bad news in a good way. Yes, I can do that. The bad news in a good way. Well, here it goes...

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought the whole point of being right wing was being negative?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

When your whole identity is consumed by boundless, baseless, joyless hatred of "the other", yes, you're gonna be negative.

I don't believe Musk is controlled by any of that though. He might share in it, but it doesn't quite dictate him as much as it dictates those in actual misery. For example, he isn't actually opposed to letting immigrants in, if they'll make him richer. He's motivated by greed and grift, and no small helping of pride.

I suspect he just doesn't want people criticising him and his cronies. Particularly when they inevitably start enacting policies that affect their base negatively (we've already seen our share of face-eating leopard voters shocked to find out that their face isn't off limits), social media could help pissed off people realise how many others are pissed off too. I don't think I need to spell out why that could be dangerous for him.

Better to quell dissent entirely. If nobody can complain about the government, it's harder to organise against it. Suppress criticism, censor the media, manipulate what you get to see to shape your view...

Sounds familiar, doesn't it?

(Obligatory note that calling a dictatorship communism doesn't make it less authoritarian than a capitalist dictatorship. Red boots hurt just as much as any other color if they step on your neck, no matter how tasty they might be. That has nothing to do with the topic, I'm just bracing for tankie whataboutisms.)

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was being slightly sarcastic cause right wing folk seem to be very negative, or nostalgic, but in a negative sense. But I get your point.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh you're absolutely right, I just felt like spelling out the subtext of "Musk isn't in it for the right wing mentality, just for the power" that I thought you were hinting at but left unsaid. I wasn't trying to contradict you at all, but rather to expand on your setup.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

I appreciate the comment cause it’s definitely something I haven’t considered enough.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago

Incumbent wants everyone to talk about how great things are.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Right, he should remove the last few humans and replace them with bots.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago

Don't want any Debbie-downers on Shitter once his bestie is in the big chair.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 days ago

He's such a fucking baby

[–] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

I'm curious whether Truth Social will acquire Xitter, or vice versa.

And when.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

More circus and bread. Classic move

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Big Macs, M4 Macbooks and AI Slop about the danger of woke to human civilization.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean in principle this is just a matter of moderation being different from censorship.

But really, an "algorithm tweak"? I am still wondering when or why who decided that we needed to have "algorithms" that someone could "tweak" on the Internet at all. The first kind of "social media" I ever used was web forums where the entire "algorithm" was thread bumping, and even if you insist that we need to have the structure of a microblog: Mastodon does fine without an "algorithm" beyond reverse-chronological sorting.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think Mastodon does fine, too, but I've often heard people complain about the lack of an algorithm. Like, they don't know how to find things if they aren't being shoveled into their feed

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago

Personally I follow slightly more than 100 accounts plus less than 10 hashtags and feel I'm already getting plenty of things into my feed, nowadays I tend to unfollow things that post too many irrelevant things more than I follow new ones.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But you had all these rightwing weirdos complaining they were being censored because "the algorithm" didn't promote their weird little ideas enough!

Back when.
So tweaking the algorithm is quite literally censorship!

Not that this "free-speech absolutist" has proven particularly true to his word.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 days ago

I strongly agree with the point made in the linked article that censorship is when a sender wants to send something, the receiver wants to receive it, but a third party (government, social media platform, whoever) keeps them from doing so.

If I want to see "weird little ideas of rightwing weirdos" (or of leftwing weirdos or any others), I should be allowed to. If I don't, I shouldn't have to.

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Reading the title I thought he'll retire.

[–] infinitevalence 6 points 6 days ago

Dont shit where you eat Elon. Its your own turd sandwich so yeah....

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

First things first, the nah-seas were also good people? Is that Elong's message of hope?

Maybe he wants X to be more MAGA friendly? Like maybe just empty the swamp and replenish the swamp monster?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

He wants to be more inclusive. More types of nazis.

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 247 points 1 week ago

Ah, so he's going to stop posting there? Right?

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 206 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Now that the election is over and we won, let's remove our bots. - musk

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

The bots are removed! All 9 users (8 of them are EM sockpuppets) celebrate!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No no, guys, you're misunderstanding. He MEANS there's too much negativity from people saying things like "X sucks since musk bought twitter....."

He's going to change those people's tweets to say "X is great!"

And by that I mean he's going to have a team to edit tweets that he doesn't like!

If that's not free speech, then Musk doesn't know what is!

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This has nothing to do with Twitters image. He could have enforced that decision sooner if it was. This is about Trump. The negativity was helpful during Bidens presidency. Now that Trump is about to take over everything has to look like the world is happy again. It's political manipulation.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It is all good now. Our elections are suddenly secure and our economy is great!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›