this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
636 points (98.8% liked)

Games

32960 readers
2350 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

running out of steam

THESE PEOPLE HAVE TO GET DEGREES IN FUCKING ENGLISH TO DO THIS

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The other day I was thinking about the movie Scrooged with Bill Murray, and how during one of the Scenes of Christmas Passed he got his girlfriend a pack of Ginsu knives for Christmas and how that's on-theme for his character who is obsessed with TV because Ginsu knives were a big As Seen On TV product and how someone on the writing staff must have went to college to think of that.

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago

That's nice sweetie 👵

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

GOG was good for acquiring and re-releasing OLD GAMES. somewhere along the way they decided they wanted to compete with the big platforms and be "We're just like them but without DRM"

I haven't used GOG for years, they allowed me to relive a few of my old adolescence favorites, but stopped being useful to me a long time ago :/

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Selling old games and new games isn't mutually exclusive, and more money tends to be spent on new games than old ones. It's not unreasonable to expect that selling new games too could subsidise the work to make old games run on modern platforms.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

i mean I get that, but what I was saying was the original purpose of the store became an afterthought.

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 39 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Let's be honest, this was apparent for a long time. Steam, a centralised platform, has been making strides in Linux gaming and has been making innovation after innovation together with its steam deck. Gog, a forefront to freedom in gaming, barely did anything for the Linux gaming scene. No innovation either. Its just the simple (and well needed) premise of no DRM. It's necessary, but not enough. It didn't cater to its niche, it just committing to creating one under a premise. That's not how you go forward. How does this connect to bad management? Well, I think that with good management gog would make different moves. And wouldn't rest on its laurels so much.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's pretty hard for GOG. Many of the things people don't like about GOG are not really GOG's fault, they are just a result of small market share. Steam is the bigger platform, and so naturally it gets priority for basically everything.

You game doesn't work on Steam? Then you'd better fix it immediately, because that's where the bulk of players are. But if your game doesn't work on GOG... well.. maybe fix it when you get some spare time. (Or maybe don't have a GOG version, because you don't want to have to keep multiple platforms up-to-date.)

So publishers and developers are generally less cooperative with GOG. And GOG themselves obviously have much more limited resources to do stuff themselves.

Steam's recent work with Linux has been great. And I do wish GOG would have something like that. But again, Valve has vast resources for that kind of thing - and they've been working on it ever since the Windows 8 appstore threatened to wipe them out. (That threat fizzled out; but nevertheless, that was what got the Linux ball rolling for Valve.) I'm in two minds about whether GOG should try to boost their Linux support. On the one hand, GOG is all about preservation and compatibility... and so it makes sense to have better Linux compatibility. On the other hand, it would be leaning further into a niche; and working on a problem that is kind of solved already. i.e. We can already run GOG games on Linux with or without a native linux version... it just could be nicer... Maybe it's not a good use of GOG's resources to go for that.

(That said, when I look at their linux start.sh scripts and see cd "${CURRENT_DIR}/game" chmod +x * it makes me think they could probably put at least a bit more effort into their linux support.)

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

How would a game "not work" on GOG? isnt their whole thing that they give you just the game files with no DRM or whatever?

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (1 children)

Are you seriously asking how a piece of computer software might fail to operate correctly? As much as DRM sucks, it isn't the only thing that can cause something to not work.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 minutes ago

No im saying theres no such thing as a "GOG" version afaik. Its just the game files. What features differentiate a 'GOG' version from the same game acquired anywhere else? Their whole business model is offering games without any DRM or storefront added features, you dont even need to use their launcher, you can just download the game files directly. Whereas 'Steam' versions have all sorts of code added to be compatible with Steam.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As someone with no Linux experience, what's wrong with that code?

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It adds the executable permission (without which, things can't be executed) to all the files in the game's directory. You only need to be able to execute a few of those files, and there's a dedicated permission to control what can and can't be executed for a reason. Windows doesn't have a direct equivalent, so setting it for everything gives the impression that they're trying to make it behave like Windows rather than working with the OS.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

I mean i assume thats just easier to deal with updates where a game has multiple exe files that may or may not change names. Assuming everything in the directory is assumed to be safe, is there any downside to applying it to everything, aside from opening up the possibility of a user accidentally trying to execute like a texture file or something which I assume just wouldnt work? I actually don't know and im curious.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 minute ago

You've pretty much got it. It's bad, but it's not horrible. Trying to execute some random file such as a texture basically just doesn't work.. but only by luck. It's possible, but unlikely that the data might look enough like an actual program to run and do something unpredictable.

I'm not aware of any major reasons why its a problem to make everything as executable (and I know that when I open an NTFS drive from linux, all the files are executable by default - because NTFS doesn't have that flag). From my point of view I just think its sloppy. I figure it can't be hard for GOG to just correctly identify which files are meant to be executable. For most games its just a single executable file - the same one that GOG's script is launching. And presumably the files that developers provided GOG have the correct flags in the first place.

Anyway, not really a big deal. Like I said, I just think it's a bit low-effort.

[–] crossdl@leminal.space 1 points 5 hours ago

An official Steam Deck mod would probably be nice. Heroic Launcher kind of works.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

The launcher that they have is pretty rough. I downloaded it for Mac OS and it just wouldn’t run right. Kept closing down. If I could just download right from the website they’d have some money.

If they draw is drm free games why only allow purchase through a custom launcher like everything else?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 33 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If I could just download right from the Website

You can.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

They do not make that obvious. I downloaded the launcher and when it didn’t work I bailed. I’ll check closer

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

I don't use their launcher at all.

It's kind of a convoluted process but you can definitely download every game you own through gog without it.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yeah galaxy is sadly a bit of a mess. Back when i was still running windows it broke its own update capabilities once or twice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 48 points 15 hours ago

There's nothing wrong with the business model of selling older games at affordable prices. This is about poor management. (Or deliberately bad management by a "CEO" who was hired to destroy GOG to remove a popular choice from us).

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 29 points 14 hours ago (11 children)

Thankfully if GOG goes down I don't lose anything.

Now if Steam goes down, I lose my entire library

[–] aido@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

Gabe Newell has promised that if Steam goes down you won't lose your library, but we only have his word as assurance.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No doubt the corporate drones that take over after his death will shit all over his legacy.

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago

It's one of my biggest fears, but I guess there's always piracy especially for old games.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

As great as Gaben and Valve are his word doesn't mean anything (it's not a personal attack either, it's just that it isn't anything binding). Luckily if they fail to keep their promises (or legally cannot) then the crack community will step in. I'm pretty sure they cracked Steam DRM ages ago. I remember a friend using it for Left 4 Dead back in the day.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 22 points 14 hours ago

People talking about money kinda missing the point this is a culture issue. They need to sort themselves out clean house if people can't be reasonable for their staff.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 26 points 15 hours ago

As a result, no one on the team has the courage to express their opinion. Under Gołębiewski, GOG typically makes business decisions that may be profitable in the short term, but may not contribute to the platform’s long-term growth.

Why half ass things when your the good guy?

load more comments
view more: next ›