this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

22598 readers
74 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-14/california-homelessness-epidemic-licensed-tent-villages

The camps are managed by Urban Alchemy, the San Francisco-based nonprofit that has rapidly grown into a multimillion-dollar street services enterprise and embodies an elastic philosophy of shelter.

Aggressive marketing aligned with rising public discontent over homelessness made for a winning strategy. By 2021 it reported $51 million in revenue primarily from contracts for street outreach and shelter operations in San Francisco; Austin, Texas; Portland, Ore.; and Los Angeles.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The camps are managed by Urban Alchemy, the San Francisco-based nonprofit that has rapidly grown into a multimillion-dollar street services enterprise and embodies an elastic philosophy of shelter.

That entire sentence is cursed. agony-deep

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're nonprofit therefore it's ethical very-intelligent

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actual fucking argument I hear way too many times. doomer

[–] charly4994@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The hospitals in my area are all "non-profit." The SNF I worked at was "non-profit." They bragged that they were bringing in over a billion in revenue as a moderately sized regional health network when they were trying to recruit us in nursing school It doesn't mean anything other than they have to spend all their money by the end of the year, which is typically done by padding administrative and executive salaries obscenely while paying nurses and CNAs a pittance.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

they have to spend all their money by the end of the year, which is typically done by padding administrative and executive salaries obscenely

You cracked the code. nicholson-yes

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A guy tried to convince me that all the high schools in his home country being privately owned was fine because they're all non profit lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JUST BUILD A FUCKING APARTMENT BUILDING IN THAT EXACT SPOT AND GIVE THEM HOUSES YOU FUCKING GHOULS

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Same reason why more mass transit can't be built: it won't be a profitable bazinga novelty making tech billionaires richer.

[–] Elon_Musk@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Lets just cherry pick a few lines

the ambiance of an Army field base.

guards are on duty around the clock.

some people preferred tents

Tents also β€œallowed them to keep the familiar environment

Aggressive marketing aligned with rising public discontent over homelessness made for a winning strategy.

$44,000 per tent

$44,000 per tent

$44,000 per tent

$44,000 per tent

$44,000 per tent

$44,000 per tent

$33k ANNUALLY per tent

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

33k annually. I hate Capitalists so fucking much it’s unreal.

More than a luxury apartment holy shit just give the homeless the money

agony

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a fucking racket, 44k PER TENT for initial cost outlay?? What the actual fuck?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

DAE PRIVATIZATION MAKES EVERYTHING CHEAPER AND BETTER so-true

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

So, this is it, huh?

We went from putting people on the moon with a fucking pocket calculator for a computer to "Idk, what if we just put the tents in nice, neat grids?" That's really the best we can do?

Yo, anyone care to chime in on why the US is seemingly addicted to only engaging with stupid solutions?

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Real solutions would involve changing society somewhat and we can't do that.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be gommunism vulvulzula gorillion dead and who would innovate? wojak-nooo

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

far more capital can be accumulated in managing a problem than from solving a problem.

additionally, providing for a basic level of dignified existence to all people would undermine employers' power over workers. i.e. the Reserve Army of Labor / "Why The Extremely Wealthy US Doesn't Have Universal Healthcare?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Yo, anyone care to chime in on why the US is seemingly addicted to only engaging with stupid solutions?

Because LED car tunnel go brrr. so-true

[–] pastalicious@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Real solutions can be appraised and given a realistic cost or profit potential. Made up dumb nonsense is better for a world that is fully financialized because the people who are supposed to make money have a monopoly on the β€˜information’ and control the inputs enough that they can abandon their house of cards at exactly the right time to extract the maximum wealth and leave the public holding the bag.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Yo, anyone care to chime in on why the US is seemingly addicted to only engaging with stupid solutions?

Good solutions cost more, this one they get to have 44k per tent (and pocket probably 40k)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we built the homeless 846 sq ft apartments (and then gave them 33K a year), how would landlords extract 2K a month in rent for a studio apartment? How would walmart find people desperate enough to work minimum wage?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The communist solution to homelessness: Give them homes

The liberal solution to homelessness: Means-based access to tent cities

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sanctuary districts just in time for 2024

[–] beautiful_boater@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just here waiting for the Bell Riots.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow, wow wow wow wow

Wow.

How the hell did the star trek writers get it this right?

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

They lived through the 70s, 80s, and 90s, and knew how to connect a few points to create a line.

[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm just hoping they're right about the Irish Reunification of 2024

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] learn3code@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

I should have known that we would find a way to do sanctuary districts but even worse. What's a little privatization between friends?

[–] D61@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Just give them homes. jokerfication

Just GiVe them HoMEs. joker-troll

JuSt GiVe ThEm HoMeS! marx-joker

[–] Big_Bob@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

an elastic philosophy of shelter.

What the fuck does that mean and why do I get such an ominous feeling when reading it?

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get the feeling that soon we'll all be dealing with more elastic concepts, such as elastic concepts of food, water and environmental survivability

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There is another for profit company running a shelter in my town....as a service provider I fucking hate it, but they (the county) literally open places up like this, throw a bid at already overburdened/underpaid front line workers and hope they come in and create a whole fucking new program from the ground up. And it's usually the ACTUAL Frontline workers who do this, not like middle management or whatever. At least in my case. Then these for profits swoop in instead. It's fucking weird

Idk if it says in the article, but Ted Wheeler agreed to work with them without any stakeholder input from the community, non profits, or actual houseless people. Disgusting

Edit for more context, I need to slow down when typing lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lowered_lifted@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

This company is the worst kind of shady rent a cop type that flourished under the Trump administration and continues under Joe "Nothing will fundamentally change" Biden. They are grifters and bullies and take in millions to prey on homeless people to make rich people feel safe or whatever. They work as private security, skirting regulations about that by calling their staff "ambassadors" and just generally operate like a street gang. Urban Alchemy is a curse on the West Coast and they want to take their business model of public private partnerships between them and corrupt local government officials like Ted Wheeler in Portland or Mitch O'Farrell in LA.

[–] wombat@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

we may have to start making excuses for the lack of terror

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So they are putting the homeless into security fenced camps and just hoping nobody draws parallels? I'm sure some people are truly much better off, but this clearly wasn't done for their sake. The purpose is to clean up and contain the homeless, it's all bigotry and property values.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

very-smart you see it'd only be bad if the government did it. private companies doing concentration camps is the Spirit of Freedom

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the Star Trek Deep Space 9 episode.

You'd think ghettoes for the homeless are a bit on the nose, and yet the US is heading that way and on schedule too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

everyone involved. death. their loved ones. death. everyone who has read even a single word of this shit and not instantly recoiled in horror. death

skin them and leave them outside this fucking atrocity as a warning

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

New list just dropped ✍️

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is it that fucking hard to raise a few buildings they can live in?

[–] rubpoll@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

It's not hard, but it's also not profitable, so it will never happen in America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

I hate the antichrist

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

embodies an elastic philosophy of shelter.

stalin-gun-1stalin-gun-2

[–] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago
[–] Elon_Musk@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

multimillion-dollar street services enterprise yes-honey-left

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're still homeless if you live in a tent you fucking ghouls

load more comments (2 replies)

when the headline is a question, the answer is no

Death to America

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί