this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
439 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2357 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s team is considering abolishing key banking regulators, including the FDIC and OCC, with plans to consolidate their functions under the Treasury Department.

Critics warn this could undermine public trust in banking, weaken deposit insurance protections, and risk another financial crisis.

The FDIC, established during the Great Depression, played a crucial role in managing the 2023 banking crisis.

Trump allies, backed by financial industry donors, are also targeting other consumer protections, reflecting sweeping deregulatory ambitions tied to Project 2025’s proposals.

Experts fear these moves could destabilize the economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] The_v@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The 2020's are looking to end like the 1920's.

Not a recession, but a massive depression.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Except, considering how globalized the world economy is today, it would cause a complete total economic collapse on a global scale. You thought the great depression in the 1920s was bad? You have no idea how bad it can really get.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not just economic globalization, but the global ecosystem's food chains are already starting to collapse thanks to climate change, and our factory farming systems are becoming increasingly prone to virulent diseases wiping out huge crops of both plants and animals. I wonder what happens when food prices skyrocket because half our food supply has been contaminated, and at the same time inflation explodes thanks to plain ol' financial mismanagement

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The 1920s depression was infamously global.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

massive depression

Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ahead of the curve on this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

It's gonna be baaaaad.

[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump (2 weeks after everything all the experts said would happen happens): Noun one knew how complicated banking is... my uncle, the MIT professor; huege brain was surprised this happened. An MIT professor didn't think this could happen; speaking of things that happen, Batron... where is Batron? Where is, possibly, my "favorite" son? The crypto visionary. Let me tell you about the importance of crypto. Did you know this stuff is mined? Like from the earth? More valuable than water it is. Looking to back the usd by crypto and then by water. It's free it just drops from the sky like "Bing, Bing Bing bing" might as well as be kaching!!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I fucking hate that what you wrote could be credibly said by him. I mean except how eloquently you put it lol

[–] inkrifle@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Wasn't lack of regulation what caused the 2008 recession?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And supply-side-God willing, we can get back to there.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 1 week ago

Look, some of us are going to make the sacrifice to supply-side-God. We gotta do everything to help the rich get richer. Cause fuck us plebs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but American voters don't give a shit.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They found a way to blame it all on the poorz. Oh, and POC.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I think you misspelled "Poor people trying to live above their divinely ordained station!"

  • American GOP and Finance Industry
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They don't care if they tank the dollar, it will make the assets in the Strategic Dogecoin Reserve that much more valuable.

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the plan is to actively tank the dollar

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The question is, how do you bet against the US Economy and for whatever selfish fuckhead of a plan they have.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As the person said below, move your currency out of the US dollar into something like gold or buy a house with a 30-year mortgage because you are basically shorting the dollar for a hard, tangible asset.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rishado@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well look, I'm not advocating for this coming government nor am I an economic expert. But in a vacuum one could impose tariffs on imported goods, tank the cost of labor in your own country, and force manufacturing back here, right? And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China. If it weren't for the local oligarchy here I'd say it's even a tough but fair plan for the economy. Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class as whatever improvement we manage to make will be sucked away by the ruling class. But the plan isn't horseshit in a vacuum. Someone please feel free to tell me why I'm completely wrong as I'm not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China....Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class

...and...

Someone please feel free to tell me why I’m completely wrong as I’m not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

Those tariffs would destroy our $1.95 trillion in exports from the USA because many of those are finished goods with input materials imported (and now tariffed to high heaven). source

Modern manufacturing doesn't depend on hundreds of thousands of human bodies anymore. New manufacturing factories would be highly automated and only employ a tiny fraction of the now unemployed workforce to produce the same amount of goods as in years past.

"From 1960 to today, American steel mills have decreased from an average of 700,000 workers to just 83,000. And within the last 40 years, the productivity of labor has increased more than five times from approximately 10 man-hours per finished ton to under 2." source

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So we're basically forfeiting a bunch of jobs related to and effected by procuring overseas input materials to gain a small fraction of manufacturing jobs? That just sounds like it will damage the economy and not bring it back up.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly why everyone with a brain has been shouting that this is the worst possible idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not gonna lie. If the FDIC goes, I withdraw immediately.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And do what? It's literally not possible to live without a bank account any more. They've actively destroyed cash as a means of payment

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What? Cash still works man, and probably will still work. They just made non-cash ways of spending money more convenient, which is why so many aren't using cash anymore, but it won't go anytime soon.

Or are you talking about something else I'm not thinking of?

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

To pay my rent I would have to take my paycheck physically to a bank, cash my check, use that cash to buy multiple money orders, and then mail those money orders. Keep in mind this has to be done early enough to be delivered before the 1st and that the bank is mostly open when I'm at work.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't a whole silicon valley bank just wipe out its customers savings by not being fdic insured

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2023/03/12/why-deposit-insurance-didnt-help-silicon-valley-bank/

Apparently not. They managed to set themselves up in such a way that caused the failure, but the majority of depositors had over the $250,000 cap on FDIC insured assets.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

That's not a recession. That's a depression

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

2029 looking a lot like 1929.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Just where the fuck will people do their banking without FDIC?

I saw that asshat Andreesen lying his fucking ass off on Rogan about how the poor little tweedums on the right were being "debanked" because of "free speech", but not anyone else.

Meanwhile, what the hell would you call something like this?

The right has people within it that are just so insane that I really do think some would withdrawal their money from the bank, and set all their own cash on fire if they thought it would pwn teh libz.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A MAGAt would eat his own shit if he knew a WoKe LibRuL would have to smell it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Places like cash app and venmo... where you can have predation turned up to 11.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] greyfox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Credit unions use the NCUA instead of FDIC. So if they don't go after that as well there are still some options.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I would just avoid ALL US banks. Canada has CDIC and our future Trumpian PM hasn't been paid yet to kill it.

US stores don't care where the money comes from so that could be an option.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

And of course, his pick for secretary of the treasury who would oversee all regulations of the stock market is a hedge fund billionaire 🤦🤬

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Should I start stuffing my money under my mattress right now?

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If rapid inflation occurs, then no (invest in non-monetary assets). If a bank run occurs then yes. Both could definitely happen if they can't manage to cut trillions of dollars of spending but further cut corporate taxes while deregulating banks and consumer protections. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

Jesus fucking Christ on a stick CAN WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE YEAR WHERE THERE ISN'T SOME MAJOR FIXKING BULLSHIT. 😡

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

Looks like a bank run is back on the menu, bois!

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Destabilize?

No, this is far worse. Big banks will just take your money. Credit Unions? I have no fucking idea.

I also can't just walk into my bank and pull out $10k without raising all sorts of questions and concerns.

Jesus fuck.

When gambling on the failure of stocks is allowed you get stupid people trying to tear the whole thing down over a quick buck smh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can walk into a bank and get approved to a loan with payments equal to 70% of my income. Regulations are already criminally absent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was a 2023 banking crisis?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago

Some Silicon Valley investor bank failed IIRC, there were a couple of bank runs?

Lot of shit happened last year, I barely remember.

[–] subiacOSB@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Might as well take a gamble and put all my money in bitcoin if it’s not FDIC insured

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah from here up north this is just watching slow motion Vehicular manslaughter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›