this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
439 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s team is considering abolishing key banking regulators, including the FDIC and OCC, with plans to consolidate their functions under the Treasury Department.

Critics warn this could undermine public trust in banking, weaken deposit insurance protections, and risk another financial crisis.

The FDIC, established during the Great Depression, played a crucial role in managing the 2023 banking crisis.

Trump allies, backed by financial industry donors, are also targeting other consumer protections, reflecting sweeping deregulatory ambitions tied to Project 2025’s proposals.

Experts fear these moves could destabilize the economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What? Cash still works man, and probably will still work. They just made non-cash ways of spending money more convenient, which is why so many aren't using cash anymore, but it won't go anytime soon.

Or are you talking about something else I'm not thinking of?

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

To pay my rent I would have to take my paycheck physically to a bank, cash my check, use that cash to buy multiple money orders, and then mail those money orders. Keep in mind this has to be done early enough to be delivered before the 1st and that the bank is mostly open when I'm at work.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have an "empty" account where you put only the money you need to transfer and do the transfer right after that.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, in other words, don't use cash?

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

For the things that require you to pay by transfer.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

NYC Philly Denver San Francisco NJ DC

All these require businesses to accept cash. The only states where it was proposed and shut down was in red states; ND MS

"85% of sellers who accept cash and use the online payment processing service Square said they never plan to stop taking cash, according to Shelle Santana, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School who has been analyzing Square transaction data."

Republicans don't care about discriminating against unbanked people. Sounds like you probably live in a Republican hell hole

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What point are you trying to make? Nothing you said addresses any of the barriers to using cash exclusively that I brought up. My landlord doesn't live nearby so I can't exactly just go hand him a massive wad of cash nor will my employer pay me in cash so I don't have to get to a bank during business hours.

I live in California by the way.

[–] Saurok@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

You're probably telling them something they're already viscerally aware of.