this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
202 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3467 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't threaten me with a good country.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Can Canada take the coastal states?

Can Minnesota come along too? We're basically in Canada here already.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 58 minutes ago

Yeah, divorce yourself from all those states that send you money because you're too backward to care for yourself. Sounds like a great idea!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If it weren't mainly a rural vs. urban split, I'd be all for the fascists getting their own country to ruin. But we're too spread out to make it feasible.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 2 points 41 minutes ago

Yeah, we'd essentially become three countries - the West, the East, and the No-Go Zone in the middle. Just get us New Mexicans to somewhere decent before all borders close.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Greene on Monday described these actions as a threat against Trump's "mandate."

That mandate calls for actions Democratic states must accept, Greene argued, such as the mass deportation of "illegal invaders" and preventing trans children from playing sports.

The funny thing is that MTG is getting less and less of a "mandate" from GA-14 for all of her crap: In 2020 she got 74.6 percent of the vote, in 2022 she got 65.9, and in 2024 she got 64.4. Keep it up Marge.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

They all swore an oath to equal protection under the law. Funny how they can ignore that mandate

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 17 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Still way, way, way too high for a white supremacist goblin in human form to get.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 39 minutes ago

Yeah, but she mainly represents white supremacist goblins in human forms.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago

A republican flip flopping on states rights again? I'm shocked.

[–] M600@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

A known traitor threat against the United States was allowed to run for and be elected president. This country doesn't have laws except for the poor and it certainly doesn't have a functioning system of justice or even government at this point.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Depends.

Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

"illegal" is rather a quaint notion.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is it really illegal if the law isn't enforced? Is anything a Republican does illegal anymore?

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

I've always loved this quote about conservatism:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

  • Francis M. Wilhoit
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 23 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, with what I'm genuinely concerned is going to happen, that would probably be preferable. Give everyone some notice, and we can escape the nutjobs by being homeless in California and New York instead of concentrated in camps in Florida and Georgia. I mean, it'll inevitably make the blue state nation more conservative as they blame southern refugees for all their problems, but it'd still be better more than likely

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The notice is now. I’m getting out of Ohio for that reason.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't threaten me with a good time lady.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Right? The country is split basically 50. This seems like the obvious thing to do.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

I wouldnt say that. Left and right leaning people are mixed all over the country. It's not like the civil war when people were geographically located where the states wanted to cecede.

Point is, my comment was a joke. If the U.S. fractures into a bunch of smaller countries, its not going to be a good time for anybody.

load more comments
view more: next ›