this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
623 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3362 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While millions will still vote for the Republican candidate, perhaps hating immigrants more than they love reproductive rights, the only certainty at this point is that many millions more will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris. In the latest ABC News/Ipsos national poll, the Democrat enjoyed a 14% advantage with women over Trump; among women with a college degree, that number rose to 23%; among women voters under 40, it rocketed to 34%.

...

That, in turn, is causing some MAGA commentators to break from their usual posture of feigned confidence to outright panic.

“Early vote has been disproportionately female,” Charlie Kirk, head of Turning Point USA and helping to lead the Trump campaign’s get-out-the-vote effort, posted on social media. “If men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 358 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Ladies, divorce your Republican husband while you still can.

[–] FancyLad@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago

Based and actually good advice

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From a hotel in another city or a distant but good friend's place. Avoid the black eyes please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah, but republican men are pushing for laws to make it difficult or even illegal to divorce them without permission.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 71 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s not a joke, it’s deadly serious.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] undercrust@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

See, now if a billionaire would just finance divorce lawyers for this, then I might have a second thing on my list of things that billionaires are good for.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

I was about to ask you what the first thing was.

Then my stomach rumbled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 225 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They're preparing to strip women from voting, like in the good ol' times.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We're not going to let that happen. I refuse to go backwards.

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 114 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I refuse to go backward too, but they overuled Roe, which my aunties told me would NEVER happen. So just not going back isn't enough. We have to move forward.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Well if early indicators are correct, not only will Kamala win, it's possible to retake congress.

To state the obvious... Go Vote, bring your friends, every vote counts. Especially when it comes to down ballot.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Like I said

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Well if early indicators are correct, not only will Kamala win, it’s possible to retake congress.

Don't do that. Don't give me that kind of hope.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be the sweetest nectar if a woman beat that misogynistic, rapey carnival barker.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 28 points 2 weeks ago

A black woman.

One of my favorite anti-Trump signs said, "God kept Trump alive so he could lose to a black woman."

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

Early voting is not an accurate prediction of the results of the whole electorate. Very different demographics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

We already have, babe. Bodily autonomy for us is no longer a guarantee.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago

So I remember hearing in HS US history class that one of the arguments against women's suffrage 100-odd years ago is that married men would now have 2 votes instead of one. This would disadvantage them against bachelors or widowers, who would of course not be able to dictate their nonexistent wives' votes. Unmarried men would only have the one vote, which didn't seem fair.

I guess the idea is not a new worry. It just seems like the fretting has reversed its polarity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 100 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The fact that they're still married to these assholes is beyond me at this point.

I hope that the trend that young people have of not wanting to fuck Republicans hold because seriously, stop fucking Republicans by stop fucking Republicans.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

You get into these things when you’re younger and it’s very hard to get out again later.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say don't fuck republicans, but do not marry one without a prenup because there is like a 90% chance they'll go insane because they saw non-white bandaids on a shelf or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Goddammit, men. Why do you have to always make us all look bad?

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damned Scot's! They ruined Scotland!

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

Like Republicans and Democrats
Or Republicans and Blacks
Or Republicans and Mexicans
Or Republicans and Muslims
Or Republicans and Immigrants
Or Republicans and Atheists
Or Republicans and Gays
Or Republicans and Trans
Or Republicans and Women
Or Republicans and Single Women
Or Republicans and Cat owners
Or Republicans and people Not Republican Enough!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If they’re scared to tell you they don’t like Donald trump, maybe you should reevaluate how you treat your wife and family. Jesus Christ

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

bro, people like us, we see our wives as actual people. it's just not like that for them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago

I have a suggestion for the "men" who are mad that their wives now have agency

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As much of a controversial term as it can be, this is why we need Feminism, with a capital F. Go wives! Do what you know you must! Do not let your husbands control you! Never go back!

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Feminism is only controversial to reactionaries.

Everyone else thinks women should be equal members of society.

Wave that feminism flag!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I saw a man push his wheelchair bound wife up to the voting booth, then he pressed the buttons for her, then pushed her out of the way and entered his votes. The whole time the poll workers were just letting it happen.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 2 weeks ago

Report that shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

I don't even think it works in ironic quotations. No man with any true virtue, decency, civility, and honor wants to rob women of their own agency. The concept makes me fucking sick to the core of my being. It is morally reprehensible, and unforgivable. It honestly gets me enraged.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have lived through reagan, bush, clinton, bush ii, obama, trump and biden...i am frightened for the first time since Nighthorse-Campbell changed affiliation...are we ready to go through this again?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Anyone who lived through 9/11 and didn't feel particularly frightened about what would happen next simply wasn't paying attention

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

I was worried it might cause anti-foreigner hate that would snowball into the US becoming like Nazi Germany.

Thank goodness THAT didn't happen!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Let's hope!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Don't let crazy stick its dick in you.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

They are. Go find the others and be with them. Say, the South Pole?

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why would this be Happening if MAGA was Pro Women like they say?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›