this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
180 points (95.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
5108 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago
[–] grue@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

On one hand, fuck Russia.

On the other hand...

The court imposed a fine of 100 thousand rubles ($1,025) per day, with the total fine doubling every week.

...I really wish western governments had the balls to impose fines like this on tech companies when they engage in actual fuckery.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That "fuckery" was blocking Russian propaganda on YouTube due to US sanctions.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I know; I wrote "actual" fuckery to contrast with that.

I would like to see Google punished with weekly-doubling fines for the things it actually deserves to be punished for, as opposed to blocking Russian propaganda, which it does not deserve to be punished for.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you're the Russian state then Google deserves this.

What you want is authoritarianism when it suites you, and liberalism when it doesn't.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, fuck that nonsense. Objective reality exists and moral relativism is bullshit.

Whether Google deserves to be punished for something depends entirely on what that something actually was, and the notion that there's some kind of hypocrisy in agreeing with punishment in one circumstance but not another is absolutely ridiculous.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, fuck that nonsense. Objective reality exists and moral relativism is bullshit.

Even if it's true - you aren't the one deciding what Google "deserves" or not now are you? So you need to convince others of your "objective reality".

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fines need to be payable, otherwise they are a joke. A large chunk of global revenue GDPR-style is reasonable because it really hurts the profits but it's still small enough that the company can pay it, and it will incentivize the company to change their practices. If the company (or anyone) gets a fine they can't pay they will just ignore it, so it only makes sense if you want to kick out the company out of your country, in which case you should skip the extra steps.

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 36 points 2 weeks ago

russia is such a deeply unserious country

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

"we need money to fund our special military operation kthxbye"

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

L0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000L

[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

LMAA,AAAO I'm adopting the long word seperator

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago

May as well throw in a unicorn and two perpetual motion machines.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Headline writer should have learned scientific notation

[–] tal@lemmy.today 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that it's more impactful this way.

[–] TechieDamien@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

And not everyone will understand scientific notation unfortunately.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Russia is doing so well with its invasion that it can issue multi-million dollar fines.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess technically that's multi-million...

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Trillions of millions, if you will.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah? Well I fine Russia $20 Googol Plex Decillion!

So there!

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's getting close to googleplex rubles!

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had just given Putin tree fiddy the week before

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why did you give him tree fifty? Now hes gunna be coming back invading other countries for another 3 fiddy

[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To put that into perspective, the World Bank estimates global GDP as around $100 trillion, which is peanuts compared to the prospective fine. Google would therefore have to find more money than exists on Earth to pay Moscow

I'm not sure that GDP is the best number to use here. That's annual economic activity. I'd think that that wealth would be more-interesting.

According to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_wealth

...total global household wealth in 2022 -- which I imagine is closer to what one wants -- is about $454 trillion.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Just 440528634361233480160 times the global wealth. Sounds like a reasonable value, decided by a judge that was definitely not drunk.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure, but that might exceed the total monetary value of the entire solar system if completely disassembled and sold as raw material. Anybody wanna try and do the math? Cause I know I can't.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most countries in the world are party to the Outer Space Treaty:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty

Article II

Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.

Basically, all countries realistically capable of trying to enforce such a claim are party to the treaty.

So as things stand, nobody can really own any celestial bodies outside Earth.

I imagine that if humanity survives and spreads and starts to have interest in resources elsewhere, that that may change, but as things stand, the effective value of everything up there is pretty much zero, because you can't own anything other than spacecraft that you launch.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I'm aware of the treaty, but that thing won't be worth the paper it's written on if the billionaires think they can have their own asteroids.

[–] crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

I have a feeling there aren't that many dollars

[–] jockets@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

To put that into perspective, the World Bank estimates global GDP as around $100 trillion, which is peanuts compared to the prospective fine. Google would therefore have to find more money than exists on Earth to pay Moscow

Yeah, uhm... let's get into a 1000x more severe depression than 1929 to get the money printed, eh?

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like Russia is already expecting hyperinflation

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

They are losing the war against inflation.

[–] Lyre@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Does anyone know the name of the number with that many zeroes?

[–] nimomycelium@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

20 nonillion in short scale, or 20 quintillion in long scale.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

First sentence of the article: A Russian court has ruled that Google owes Russian media stations around $20 decillion in fines for blocking their content, and the fines could get bigger.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

So no one? I assume that’s what you said tbh I didn’t read the whole thing.

[–] CaptainSkipper@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] SilverCode@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sheesh, well why don't they just say that in the first paragraph of the article /s