this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
160 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
229 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Copyright Office has denied a request to allow remote access to out-of-print video games, a decision that impacts video game preservation efforts. The request, supported by the Video Game History Foundation and the Software Preservation Network, aimed to let libraries and archives digitally share these games with researchers. However, the Copyright Office ruled against it, citing potential market harm and copyright concerns.Key PointsDenial of Exemption: The request sought an exemption under the DMCA to enable remote access to preserved games. The Copyright Office found that proponents did not sufficiently demonstrate that such uses would be noninfringing or fair.Opposition

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 54 points 1 week ago

I miss the days when the justice system replied to the statement "this might hurt our business" with "too bad". (In the case when sony lost to that PS emulator)

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well I'm just gonna have to pirate it EVEN HARDER.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Make it your exercise routine. No chumps download shit by the megabytes, you're going to go gigabytes and beyond! HUSTLE!

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

It's legal somewhere

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

hold up, then what is the purpose of Copyright in the first place? Are they arguing copyright no longer serves its original function? To protect the authors work? When was this change made to the law?

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

-puts on tinfoil hat- Is this why we're suddenly getting so many remasters/remakes?

-takes off hat- No, it's probably because the corporate gaming industry is creatively bankrupt and want to cash in on nostalgia with minimal risk. But remakes/remasters probably strengthen the "market harm" portion of their argument.