this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
575 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2374 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 132 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

We can't even figure out how to not have half our society be rasict, how the hell are we gonna save a whole planet from our fuckery?

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 125 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We're not gonna be able to combat climate change under capitalism anyway. The number one thing we need to do is to produce less but that goes directly against what capitalism needs to function. Not to mention that governments are bribed by companies to make laws in their favour.

But hey, what's the point of saving our planet anyway if we can't maximize profits anymore?

[–] Frittiert@feddit.org 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. And if you mention this, you're a commie and capitalism is the greatest thing ever and under socialism we will all starve and have nothing and it never worked look at Cuba.

Like capitalism works, and there are no imaginable alternatives.

Just don't use resources to produce that much useless crap to just dump it in a landfill or burn it? Is it so hard to understand?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume that most people even want that. From what I can tell...

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are a large number of people out there who seem to be deliberately making it worse - not even for profit, but just out of spite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

We don't and we won't.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Humanity is fucked. My sympathy lies with the animals.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I sympathize with the children that had nothing to do with it.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

It’s why I’m not having kids.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That's all of us unless you're an executive in a multinational corp, or work for the oil and gas industry.

We've all been ramrodded into this reality by a handful of giant Corporations, over the last 100 years.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I agree. But I could have chosen more fuel efficient cars when I was younger. Bought less shit I didn't need. I could've done more. Yeah it's not entirely my fault, we've been thrown into the gauntlet, what can you do if you wanna live? But the children born now, or God forbid even later are going to find themselves in a hellscape of an economy and ecosystem. And my heart goes out to them because they'll get less than I had, less freedom, less upward mobility, less drinkable water, less food, less breathable air, and be more fucked by everything. The longer we push it, the worse it gets for the people who had less to do with it.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

If it helps to assuage your guilt at all, we have been living, inundated with corporate propaganda, for all our lives.

"Carbon footprint" is a great example; it's a Corporate guilt trip.

https://interestingengineering.com/culture/carbon-footprint-coined-by-big-oil-to-blame-you-for-climate-change

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bassad@jlai.lu 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Animals are fucked! We decimated 75% of wildlife in 50 years, and it is still growing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

societal collapse

Ah yes, that thing that has us laboring to chase meaningless plastic crap we're brainwashed into needing instead of growing our own food and maintaining our own shelters as small, purposeful communities, all so the owners of this society can siphon our energy while poisoning the earth, all to live like wannabe gods above us.

No more penis Space tourist rockets? What a loss...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

You know what would be useful in a societal collapse? Electric vehicles and solar panels.

Hopefully peppers aren’t building zombie busses because they’ll be useless in 6 months after the oil stops flowing.

An ev with a charger panel and bicycles will be useful indefinitely.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When society collapses, upwards of around 95-100% of us die. That's reality.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ll probably be one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Solar panels and batteries require massive supply chains. They require our rarest minerals and highest tech, with highly educated workers to develop and produce and state of the art clean rooms and factories.

If we stop producing them, the current stock will be useful for like 50 years tops. Then it's back to fossil fuels, I'm afraid. Diesel generators last for a long time, and they're easier to maintain and produce.

I remember i read a doomer theory stating we should be stockpiling coal for the humans that remain to rebuild society since there is nothing we can do at this point and fossil fuels is the only thing that will outlast the collapse. I'm not that pessimistic, but i can see what they mean.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Lol, Diesel can on average only be stored for 6 to 12 months before degrading. Good luck with that.

If a collapse ever happens I'd rather have solar panels and an EV. Fuel production and transport would instantly grind to a halt and the existing fuel goes bad soon after.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

"We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky..."

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] UmeU@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

That’s unfortunate because I have been trying really hard to participate in society.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

We're moving back to office until we can't move at all.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's old news, no? I recall reading that basically from 2°C there is no more economic growth, what means a lot of people are thrown under the bus. From 3°C there is no more economy, meaning no food, heating, fighting everywhere. From 4°C there is basically no more humanity.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That sounds pretty extreme. I'd be Interested in reading that article, if you can find it.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

I'm looking at the Full Volume, and on page 71 you can see

With about 2°C warming, climate-related changes in food availability and diet quality are estimated to increase nutrition-related diseases and the number of undernourished people, affecting tens (under low vulnerability and low warming) to hundreds of millions of people (under high vulnerability and high warming) ... Climate change risks to cities, settlements and key infrastructure will rise sharply in the mid and long term with further global warming, especially in places already exposed to high temperatures, along coastlines, or with high vulnerabilities (high confidence).

At global warming of 3°C, additional risks in many sectors and regions reach high or very high levels, implying widespread systemic impacts, irreversible change and many additional adaptation limits (see Section 3.2) (high confidence). For example, very high extinction risk for endemic species in biodiversity hotspots is projected to increase at least tenfold if warming rises from 1.5°C to 3°C (medium confidence). Projected increases in direct flood damages are higher by 1.4 to 2 times at 2°C and 2.5 to 3.9 times at 3°C

Global warming of 4°C and above is projected to lead to far-reaching impacts on natural and human systems (high confidence). Beyond 4°C of warming, projected impacts on natural systems include local extinction of ~50% of tropical marine species (medium confidence) and biome shifts across 35% of global land area (medium confidence). At this level of warming, approximately 10% of the global land area is projected to face both increasing high and decreasing low extreme streamflow, affecting, without additional adaptation, over 2.1 billion people (medium confidence) and about 4 billion people are projected to experience water scarcity (medium confidence). At 4°C of warming, the global burned area is projected to increase by 50 to 70% and the fire frequency by ~30% compared to today

However, if you really want to get into it, you can read the Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Full Report. It has a lot more details about the effects of climate change on all parts of the world, but it's also a 3,000 page pdf.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a bit late for that when society is turning to fascism all over the world.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good ol' fascism! You can always count on fascism to to help people. Well, the right people. I mean, some of the right people, maybe a small subset of the right people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Societal collapse, eh? Sounds like a great opportunity for profit!!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] auzy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I'd say the ones who have been saying it's not real should be the first to become soylent green

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

:shocked-picachu:

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Societal collapse is the best thing that can happen right now, capitalism will not save the workers nor the environment. Only a complete revolution can save the workers, the environment, and the future of humanity.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Societal collapse doesn’t guarantee anything for people who want any kind of revolution

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Most people forget they are probably just gonna die in an apocalypse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago

So back to the rule of kings and Strongman Despots.

Because that's what a social collapse will get you every time. There will be no "worker's paradise".

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm afraid it's not going to save anyone, because it's going to be a collapse with many casualities mainly on the side of the poor, not a revolution. I imagine it as a social disaster. The rich will be ok.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The rich will be ok and their kids will repopulate earth. With a plow, a hammer and a sicle. Oh the irony...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Your accelerationist bullshit does nothing but harm us all

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 18 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Do you actually think that?

As though we just do societal collapse on Wednesday and then start living our best lives on Thursday?

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

People think it's gonna be fun, like Zombieland. Instead, it's going to be fun, like The Road.

load more comments
view more: next ›