this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
-29 points (23.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35806 readers
2051 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Because there are entire ecosystems that don't have iOS or Android app comparability. Mainly MacOS, Windows, and Linux.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm glad they do as that's the only way I access those platforms. Same applies for twitter. Using an app means I can't block ads.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

They make it so painful though to obviously twist people's arms into installing their data harvesting apps. Facebook on mobile is so stripped down and actually freezes half the times you try to use it.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Same. But the question still stands. Worth pointing out several features are missing in Instagram for Web so they definitely want you using the app.

[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 19 points 1 month ago

Meta apps are some of the worst spyware. When I occasionally need to use Facebook, I use the web interface only, so I don't need to install the apps.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

You need it to share URLs. You can't know the device it will be opened on. Also, news articles sometimes embed them, which they use to hoard information about readers.

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was really hoping this would say “why does Facebook and Instagram provide a web interface when their crappy platforms rarely show content unless you’re using their app”.

At this point it’s purely a performance that they even offer a web interface to their platform.

Same goes for Twitter.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Instagram is especially awful when using a web browser... but pintrest wins my award for the best black hole of all time. Information goes into pintrest and then it dies forever.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because only most users use the app, some still use the web for what ever reason. Gotta give your customer what they want.

Also what about those on a pc?

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 month ago

Also what about those on a pc?

this could be the reason why they still provides the web interface ig.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

apparently Lemmy thinks this is such a stupid question it doesn't belong on NoStupidQuestions 🤷‍♀️

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I was wondering why so many downvotes

[–] chottomatte@lemdro.id 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An extra way to get more data , this time from people who doesn't download the app for whatever reasons ( like low storage for example )

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

I don't download apps if the place has a website. I don't want some garbage company on my phone unless it's in a browser. Infact most applications are just trash and show limited functionality of the website, nothing more. Most program d are literally useless trash.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

In addition to other reasons given, I see their web interfaces as recruitment methods.

People who don't have the app can still click links which bring them to the FB/IG/Tw websites - and then that could be enough to get them interested enough to then go on and install the full app especially when they find out how restricted the websites are.

[–] tun@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was a time Instagram is only accessible using mobile apps.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that's interesting.. I wonder why they revert the changes.

[–] tun@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AFAIR, Instagram started mobile only.

Then they made the service available in more platforms.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Correct, and likely because some people refuse to download the apps. I know I was one of them. I say was because I now do my best to not use their services at all, and where I do need to, I use a third-party app so I can use one app for multiple messaging services.

[–] grandel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Downvoting a stupid question in a no stupid questions community is just plain wrong yall.

[–] kometes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Better question: why would you install a security risk social media app on your phone?

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 1 month ago

It makes buisness sense to make Facebook and Instagram available to more platforms.

Because you can't target them with ads as efficently if they can't keep using your service on a pc.

Why would Zuck throw away an opertunuty to squeeze some more bucks.