this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
168 points (95.2% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3648 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Foreign investment would be an economic boost for Mexico. The company has claimed that a plant there would create about 10,000 jobs. A Tesla competitor, BYD markets its Dolphin Mini model in Mexico for about 398,800 pesos—about $21,300 dollars—a little more than half the price of the cheapest Tesla model.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 93 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Provides a better product at half the cost.

/Capitalists lose their minds.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Said it a while ago, the US is losing at capitalism for the first time in modern history and doesn't know how to cope

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 36 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Oh it knows how to cope, it’s why it’s pushing the neo-feudalism.

They want a class of slave labor to use like China, not those pesky workers with rights like they have now. It’s a race to the bottom and China has the lead.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Idk, Chinese workers might have it better than they did in decades passed.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes we do, we ban their sales here in USA! And add tariffs!

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

China builds the cars in Mexico, that forms a tariff free zone with the USA. And USA can't exactly just ban sales from Mexico because a lot of USA companies moved their operation to Mexico for cheaper labor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Chicken tax 2 no Changli for you

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's glorious to watch. Even from within. Even knowing I'm boned when this house of cards finally tumbles.

I'm sure there's a German word for that.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe Galgenhumor? Or Schadenfreude? But if both, I guess.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Even knowing I’m boned when this house of cards finally tumbles.

You probably have time to prepare. 🙂

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Is it a better product? How is the quality, the maintainability? How do they treat the environment and their workers? These are all factors I think about when considering a purchase.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Is it a better product? How is the quality, the maintainability?

I'm guessing it's like 80% as good for half the cost. That's usually how it goes with Chinese stuff.

How do they treat the environment and their workers?

Now that's just commie talk. /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why won't the Americans let in the chinese manufacturers to find out? Surely if the cars are trash they have nothing to worry about?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing about economics. Humans are not rational actors. And even if they were, they don't have perfect information.

For example, there's a thing going around in the US right now about raw milk. It's not allowed to be sold because of the risk of disease. But people are idiots and seek it out anyway, and get themselves sick.

For cars, assume one of them is an absolute lemon and deathtrap. It constantly needs maintenance, and if you get in a crash, you die. You won't know about the former until a few years after you've bought it, and if the latter happens, you can't seek any recourse because you're dead.

Now, I'm not saying that this applies to the Chinese EVs, exactly, but we haven't seen them shaken out in the US yet, and China doesn't have a very good track record with consumer safety in the recent past.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To counter those vague negative "maybes" of yours, I just want to point out that the EU, which have much more tight regulations on just about everything than the US, especially when it comes to consumer protection, allows the sale of BDY cars.

If a regulatory regime which is more strict when it comes to consumer protection than the US allows such cars to be sold, then claiming or implying that the reason for the US to block their sale there is that they might be dangerous is quite the flight of fantasy.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it's not what OP was arguing, but the main reason they don't want the cars let in is just to stop China from becoming more powerful. It has little to do with the products themselves.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely if the products were shit, then there would be nothing to worry about with respect to China's power. No?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If they're shit today, they probably won't be tomorrow. They're just as capable of bootstrapping as the next person.

Back in the 90's Clinton was quoted as saying that with capitalism and development, democracy would inevitably follow in China; trying to stop it would be like nailing jello to a wall. Nobody thinks that way anymore.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't really understand your point... I wasn't making any comment about democracy in China. That's absurd.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

To clarify, the reason China was allowed to gain that amount of economic influence in the first place was because it was thought they'd be part of the democratic West. Without that, nobody wants an authoritarian superpower.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

In Canada, Teslas from Shanghai are by far preferable to the ones from Fremont. Something about those Chinese factories man

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If you cant afford anything else than it is the best product.

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

It is much better. US car brands look like they are stuck in the 90s. Still, I don't get the preoccupation from the US, almost all cars in Mexico have been from Asia for at least a decade or maybe more. And before that it was all Volkswagen.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Don't get upset when capitalists beat you at your own game. Does it matter if it's better if we're talking about a "free market" (lol)? It's not like capitalists in the US give a shit.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I was going to say something about Chinese vehicles not entirely being the greatest quality, but then I remembered we're comparing it to American vehicles.

Better product, half the cost. Can't go wrong.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Awwwwww!

Are all the capitalists afraid of some friendly capitalist competition!?

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean... China is capitalist too its just state capitalist.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

When did I say they weren't lol

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The west needs to take the hint and ditch the fossil fuels and legacy automaker excuses.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

fossil fuels and legacy automaker

Fossil fuel companies and legacy automakers donate more

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think of fossil fuel companies and legacy automakers as part of the Deep State

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Even they aren't going to delay the inevitable forever, though.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

China Conquers Mexico

...’s Automotive Market, and the US Is Worried

Give me a heart attack this morning, why don't you?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

And we thought the timeline couldn't get any dumber.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Okay but like, we would know before it was just a done thing.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 9 points 2 months ago

Lol capitalists are stuck with cars and malls and dozens of dying industries they gon have a bad 30 years as new infrastructure becomes a necessity

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

When can I buy one of these cheap Chinese EVs?

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

To get an idea of margins:

The BYD Seagull sells under the Dolphin Mini name in South America. The Seagull (see specs) is the BYD's cheapest electric car launched in April last year. Its price range initially lay between 78,800 – 95,800 yuan (10,850 – 13,200 USD)

load more comments
view more: next ›