Today I Learned
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
Ah yes, Will Smith wouldn't want to be responsible for portraying violence on the big screen. Which is why 7 years later he made Gemini Man, where there are two violent Will Smiths.
*it's pronounced, "Earf".
I don't understand that meme. He doesn't say "Earf" at all.
It's a holdover from the at-the-time socially acceptable racist tropes of the 90s.
I have never ever heard of this being anything to do with racism lol. Wtf. It just sounds like he says "Earf". Jeez..
He very clearly says "Earth" in that scene, btw.
Good he's a shit actor and would ruin it
He wasn't always though. He was really good in Six Degrees of Separation. I have no idea what happened. Money, I guess.
Will Smith is too much of a bitch to have played that role.
Bet he was slapping himself for that decision.
That's the guy from suicide squad, right?
*some kind of suicide squad
Lack of a sense of humor begets violence.
Will is an example of that.
I imagine he was referring to a very specific kind of violence
Yeah, poor people vs the rich.
The type that results is sudden and very abrupt deceleration of the palm of the hand at someone else's face
People are focusing on the “violence begets violence” in the title but not this:
“I wanted to make that movie so badly, but I felt the only way was, it had to be a love story, not a vengeance story,” Smith said.
And… I get that? I liked Django and all, but I can see how Will might not like the bloody climax where the focus is more on the revenge than rescuing his wife. I think it’s fine he passed on the role and let it go to someone who was more invested with the revenge story.
I think it’s fine he passed on the role and let it go to someone who was more invested with the revenge story.
I don't think, I know. Django Unchain is incredible.
Will has ruined so many good ideas because he's still living in the 90s where actors had the power to change scripts. And every time Will interfered with a story, it watered it down/made it shit.
Its like he never saw a Tarantino movie in his life
Oh, the iron E ...
I'll not watch Slappy anymore. Glad that movie has a better actor in it.
Reminds me of how Jim Carey refuses to do movies with guns in them, and because of that, all the cops in the Sonic movies, including the main cop character, have these ludicrous "almost gun" things.
I kind of don't mind that!
It's like 80s-90s cartoons and the Sonic movie has that energy.
I suppose, but it was supposed to take place in the "real world" and that was not real.
Eggman's type of goofy machinery is in no way grounded in reality.
And that's why Jamie Foxx is cooler than Will Smith
Check out the original Django movie from 1966 https://youtu.be/AFrfxUWLPQM
It is very much a vengeance movie. And attributed as creating the Italian western, aka spaghetti western genre.
It’s left to the viewer but Quentin Tarantino said he interpreted Django as going to avenge the death of the wife of a black Union solder he served with in the civil war Quentin Tarantino on Django (1966)
i thought it was because he wanted it to be a straight love story
Barely relevant, but this thread had me looking it up: Knowledge Fight's cover of Wild Wild West with DJ Danarchy