this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
128 points (92.1% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2713 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ROME—Pope Francis praised 18th-century Russian emperors whom President Vladimir Putin has invoked as models for his territorial annexations in Ukraine, in the pontiff’s latest controversial statement relevant to the war.

On Friday, speaking by video to a gathering of Russian Catholic youth in St. Petersburg, Pope Francis urged them to follow in the path of Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, whom he called rulers of a “great, enlightened empire of great culture and great humanity.”

The comments on Peter and Catherine, which came at the end of the pope’s speech, weren’t included in the official transcript released by the Vatican, but were released by the Catholic diocese of Moscow and later in a video from Siberian Catholic television, a church agency.

Putin has cited Peter, who expanded Russian territory and curtailed Ukrainian autonomy, to justify the current invasion. Putin has used the term Novorossiya, or New Russia, for Russian-occupied southern Ukraine—using a term that dates back to Russia’s conquest of southern Ukraine under Catherine in 1764.

Catherine also harbored the Jesuit order, of which Pope Francis is a member, during the order’s suppression by Rome in the late 18th and early 19th century.

The Ukrainian government declined to comment, but the pope’s remarks drew angry reactions on social media, especially in countries near Russia. Former Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves called the comments “truly revolting” on X, formerly known as Twitter. Nexta, a Belarusian media outlet based in Warsaw, Poland, posted on the same platform: “By the way, the Catholics of Poland, Lithuania and Belarus raised uprisings three times against this ‘enlightened empire’.”

In a statement released on Monday afternoon, the Vatican’s embassy to Kyiv rejected suggestions that “Pope Francis might have encouraged young Russian Catholics to draw inspiration from historical Russian figures known for imperialistic and expansionist ideas and actions that negatively impacted neighboring populations, including the Ukrainian people.”

“Pope Francis has never endorsed imperialistic notions. On the contrary, he is a staunch opponent and critic of any form of imperialism or colonialism across all peoples and situations,” the statement said.

Pope Francis has frequently decried Ukrainian suffering since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, but he has refrained from explicitly condemning Moscow for the war, while suggesting it may have been provoked by the enlargement of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe’s east. The pope’s stance has drawn criticism from Ukrainians including leaders of the Catholic Church there.

The pope has repeatedly cast the war in Ukraine as a struggle between the Russian and U.S. superpowers, with Ukraine as a victim caught in the middle. “There are imperial interests at stake, not just the Russian empire, which has been around since Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, but the other empires too. There are these empires. And empires put nations in second place,” the pope said in a March interview with Swiss public television.

The Vatican has offered to broker a peace agreement in Ukraine, and Italian Cardinal Matteo Zuppi has traveled to Kyiv, Moscow and Washington as the pope’s envoy in pursuit of that mission. But neither Ukraine or Russia has shown interest in mediation.

In May, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met the pope in Rome and called on him to support Kyiv’s formula for peace, based on the withdrawal of Russia’s invasion forces, the restoration of Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory, war-crimes prosecutions and reparations.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

but he has refrained from explicitly condemning Moscow for the war, while suggesting it may have been provoked by the enlargement of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe’s east.

Countries' decisions in how they defend themselves is self-determination in internal affairs.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine is unmasked aggression outside of their borders without provocation.

Equating the two is wrong. Full stop.

NATO is only designed to kick into action in the event of attacks on member countries. It is a defensive treaty organization. If Russia wasn't being a bunch of dickholes, they'd have nothing to worry about from NATO.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm a Russian.
Even if NATO has aggression in mind, that doesn't justify current war. There's hypothetical aggression / geopolitical threat and there's real one.
Current war brings nothing, but a shame and death and is throwing both countries under the bus - all for some delusions of old ex-KGB maniac.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does sharing these views put you in danger?

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably. It's not wise of me, but sometimes I could not contain myself because being sick of it all for too long.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

The thing is 99% of the time NATO doesn't do anything. They essentially can be considered to only effectively exist every time Russia gets upset about them existing. But for the individual members they're essentially a non-organization most of the time.

I also think it's funny that the current machinations have encouraged NATO to expand, the precise opposite of what the war was theoretically supposed to achieve.

[–] Lifebandit666@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What does it mean? It's because I'm being awkward with English in some specific way?

[–] mothersprotege@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because Llewellyn is a Welsh name.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, I just love Welsh culture 😁

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

It's always easier to blame NATO than to accept Russia is actually aggressive. Because if you say that Russia are wrong then they go completely ballistic (although admittedly they are doing anyway so I'm not sure what the difference would be), but when you accuse NATO random bullshit, it's just a random Tuesday.

And it's not like the Pope is exactly a well plugged in individual. He's the Pope, having stupid takes on political situations he knows next to nothing about, is practically in the job description.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The pope is a fucking moron.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Catholics... wait... 🤔

[–] CosmicApe@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

No need to be redundant

[–] weird_nugget@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And the elites

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like Catherine the Great and Peter the Great have more complicated legacies than this article implies and maybe it’s fine if the pope says some naive shit about them. We don’t always have to have a war boner.

[–] Thoth19@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Peter also had a great legacy of modernization and westernization to Russia. Nearly every political leader has a complex legacy. People do a lot of things good and ill in their lifetimes.

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Peter the first and Catherine the second were genocidal rulers, just like Stalin and Putin. Whatever other complications may exist, that's what's relevant right now when the current russian government is engaged in another genocide.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, fine. The pope was endorsing genocide. I sent you some Reddit gold as a thank you for correcting me and I hope this can be remembered as a teachable moment.

[–] a_lemmy_user 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Big The Pope fan? I don't think they meant to hurt you, it was just a counterpoint appreciating the gravity of what's happening right now. The big guy is probably just trying not to "have an accident." Oh, those clumsy Russians.

I’m not a pope fan but I’m also not an antipope. I’ll leave the antipopery to Hippolytus of Rome et al.

Also, I wasn’t hurt. I was just not going to sincerely defend the honor of any popes or Tzars. They got one half-hearted “Maybe it’s nuanced and we can interpret this charitably.” comment and then I’m betraying any trust they might have had and saying unequivocally: popes and tzars are not squad.

[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An authoritarian figure of an ideology based on unrealistic fairy tales turns out to be a tankie, more later.

[–] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look,I agree with everything you say in principle, but how are russian empire glorifiers = tankies? What you refer to as "tankies" quite literally killed the entire russian royal family.

[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tankies just hate the US, that's all that's consistent with their thoughtprocess

[–] Barsukis@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

That is not a very productive generalisation, and I am sure you understand it