this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

2639 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's a valid question. Not every job has Visa sponsorship. They ask white people too.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It’s not only not a valid question, it might not even be a legal question.

I’m a hiring manager for a very large tech company in California. I cannot ask any questions about age, ethnicity, country of origin, citizenship status, veteran status, marital status, health, and so on.

HR can ask if they’re eligible to work in the US, and I can ask whether they have the skills and talents I need for the position, but it’s tightly limited.

It still crops up all the time. There are decades worth of studies showing how having a non-white looking name or having age indicators present in work history or graduation dates influence reviewers to reject applications they’d otherwise accept.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

It's not a valid question at all. "Are you legally able to work in the United States" has been a question on literally every single job application I've ever filled out. There's zero valid reasons for the interviewer to not know the answer already, and even less than zero valid reasons for them to phrase the question the way they did.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean you're getting g downvoted, but I'm painfully white and in the UK. Every job interview either the first or second question I get asked is "do you have the right to work in the UK?" Or "do you need a visa to work in the UK?"

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's very different than automatically assuming you aren't a citizen of the UK and asking if you have permanent residence.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's very different than automatically assuming you aren't a citizen of the UK and

That's actually exactly what asking me if I need a visa to work in the UK means.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, that leaves open the possibility that you are a UK citizen. "Do you have green card?" skips over asking if you are a citizen and goes straight to "Are you at least a permanent resident?"

Put another way, if the candidate answers "No." to "Do you have a green card?" That doesn't tell the recruiter if they need a visa or if they have the right to work in the US without a presumption that they aren't a citizen.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying it would be perfectly acceptable and neither you nor OP would complain if the question was: "Do you need a greencard?"

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's kind of a weird question, too. Like, what does it mean if you say no? That you are a citizen or that you don't intend to become a permanent resident?

"Do you need a visa?" Or "Are you legally allowed to work in the United States?" would be the way it would generally be asked and isn't a problem. See all the comments that replied to the person saying it wasn't a big deal.