this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
542 points (90.2% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2292 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Agreed. There's only one solution. The UN needs to disarm both sides, depose their governments and make the whole area a UN protectorate. Remove any illegal settlements. Try anyone on both sides involved in war crimes or human rights violations.

Israel and Palestine can not behave like grown ups? Take away their toys and put them in time out.

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A foreign military occupation of an entire region in the Middle East to ensure peace.

Does anyone remember how this one goes?

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'll take standing under a mission accomplished banner on an aircraft carrier for $200.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely agree. The two sides need to be separated and put in time out.

However disarming Israel is politically impossible when they're a cyber weapons super power.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Israel is a way more prosper place than Palestine and hence its people have way more to lose if the country is placed under sanctions, its companies cut off from trading with the West and its members of governament personally held accountable internationally.

(Basically they're susceptible to the same kind of pressure that forced the authorities in South Africa to end Apartheid and have genuinelly democratic elections)

Those who have the most to lose are the easiest to convince, which is also why, on the other side, not even treating Hamas as a terrorist organisation (which is an even harder thing than "mere" sanctions) has stopped them from finding "soldiers" - as long as Israel makes sure those born in Palestine have nothing to lose, for many even joining an organisation internationally viewed as terrorist is still a step-up in life.

If you pardon my language (but I think the situation deserves it), it's quite paradoxical that the International community has to fuck up Israel enough so that they stop fucking up the life of Palestinians so much, to the point that the lives of said Palestinians improves enough that they end up having enough to lose from siding with or joining Hamas (which is alread being fucked up).

Then again, maybe it's not a paradox: look at how the only way to stop a similar bully, Russia, requires "fucking them up" in that way (being more integrated with the West, not having natural resources like that, and being a whole lot more democratic (even if imperfectly so) Israel would be a lot easier to sway away from acting as a bully.

As far as I can see, it's either that or the genocide of Palestinians and I would hope that not even in this day and age and not even if it's one of the "slow boiling" kind, most people in the West would be ok with a genocide.

[–] SpicaNucifera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!! ....oh, you're serious.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean they can also just keep bombing and torturing each other for the next 100 years, it's been working so well so far.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sadly, as history shows, humans actually keep doing just about that.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, nobody has quite the strength even for these two sides. First, war is not a linear application of resources, it's unpredictable. Second, that'd be a precedent every nation with conflicts would try to prevent, and such nations are usually the strongest. Third, we've all seen over the years how well UN missions, peacekeepers etc work.