this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
331 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The Speakership is a real job, as in, it requires A LOT of work. You can't just give a press conference, watch yourself on TV, and sign executive orders.

With that in mind, I also support Trump for Speaker of the House. It'll be fucking hilarious at how ungodly terrible it will go. I give him 1 week before he makes up a story about how CIA DNC FBI deep state is trying to kill him, so he has to flee to Mara Lago.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If Trump gets speaker of the house some morons will try to assassinate the president and vice president to make him regain the presidency.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the same people who live streamed themselves storming the capital on January 6th?

Don't threaten me with a good time, because as funny as a Trump speakership would be, watching morbidly obese morons trying, and failing, to assassinate the President might even be funnier.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, a Castro fanboy made a damn good drive at it, and same with several other mentally ill people. I understand it is MUCH HARDER now, but do not discount some of these militia types and other far-right people - there's been plenty of groups that have tried to plan assassinations of political figures of one stripe or another for the last 30 years, and I'm sure it ramped up quite a bit when Biden won the election in 2020.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many MAGA supporters work secret service or white house details?

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Probably the whole Secret Service. Look at this email:

https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/emails-reveal-secret-service-contacts-with-oath-keepers/

The agent is obviously proud to be the "unofficial (inching towards official)" liaison to the Oath Keepers. He has no reason to hide it, either. They exchanged cell phone numbers. This is what they wanted.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thats their plan obviously, stochastic terrorism all the way. Its like they are saying .. "Look at this insane MAGA nuts, we've given you an opening!!!"

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, being President should be a real job too, but that kind of ended in 2001 when we hired a moron. Obama would have done the job if the GOP had let him, instead of being so obsessed with his ethnicity.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did we hire the moron or did the supreme court?

Oooh good point. Supreme Court fucks the Public once again.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The voters made it close enough for the SCOTUS and a few Florida crazies to make the decision.

[–] Jonna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Reagan. Possibly others, like Harding, but that was before my time.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

there won't be anything hilarious about it