this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
108 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15911 readers
687 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrispyFern@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The left/right distinction is to determine if something is pro or anti capitalism. If you like capitalism or think it can be "reformed" then you are right wing. If you want to see capitalism destroyed, then you are left wing.

The 2 main classes of people under capitalism are the proletariat (working class, 99%, people who make a living by performing labor and receiving a wage), and the capitalists (bourgeois, ownership class, 1%, people who make a living by owning shit). Landlords are firmly in the capitalist class, which means their entire livelihood is based around capitalism continuing to exist in it's current form. It's nearly impossible for a landlord to be left wing because it goes against their own self interest. I guess class traitors exist, but I doubt the person in question is one since they're trying so hard to downplay being a landlord.

TL;DR: porky-scared-flipped stalin-gun-1 mao-shining

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The left/right distinction is to determine if something is pro or anti capitalism. If you like capitalism or think it can be "reformed" then you are right wing. If you want to see capitalism destroyed, then you are left wing.

I don't agree.

From what I see there's a strong effort to redefine terms like left and right to shame people into adjusting their values.

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, that happened ages ago. for most of the twentieth century leftwing meant anticapitalist.

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Year of the pig PIGPOOPBALLS

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey liberal, I see you're running afoul of our "Post"-based posting rules here. If you'd like I can explain them so fewer of your comments are removed.

Also, just because liberal hegemony brutally suppressed the left in the west for the last ~150 years (including the present day) doesn't mean that liberalism magically became left wing as a result. Liberalism hasn't been left-wing since the mid-19th century. So now it's our turn to ask you, sorry what year is it again?

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry I'm an anarchist and don't respect your rules, I'm not going to adapt or adjust the way I speak to appease some moderator with a control complex.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No that's ok! I'm an anarchist too. We just need you to post your hog as verification in order to be allowed to continue posting here.

In other words, hog out or log out LIB

Also lmao no gods, no masters includes landlords you insufferable radlib.

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

countdown

you have until this timer expires to comply with our verification rules by posting a picture of your penis

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My dick won't fit in frame, please advise.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

just post what does. our posted-hog verification system uses machine learning to determine uniqueness from as little as 150x150 pixels of verification evidence

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Dont be too hard on yourself

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

liberals can insist they're left all they like. it doesn't make it true.

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And likewise you can insist the opposite, doesn't make it true, it's just gaslighting.

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you know what that term means. also, my meaning of left connects me with historical movements while yours infinitely atomizes. which meaning is more useful?

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you know what that term means.

Or is that just want you want me to think!?!

also, my meaning of left connects me with historical movements while yours infinitely atomizes. which meaning is more useful?

I think trying to grade political ideology on a left/right axis doesn't really make a ton of sense, and really only servers to muddy the waters, and create a sense of consensus that isn't really there.

What's the significance of feeling connected to historical movements?

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

I get to analyze possible actions based on the works and results others have produced. it makes it more likely that I'll succeed. to atomize oneself away from history is to destroy the possibility of progress.