this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
1625 points (96.5% liked)

World News

39041 readers
3263 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Killing Prigozhin definitely pissed off a lot of nationalist Russians

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What I don't get: Doesn't this turn the Wagner mercenaries into even more of loose cannons? What's stopping them to just fracture into chaotic splinter groups now?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As soon as these mercenaries stop getting paid, they'll wander off and find another paymaster.

Note that a good chunk of contemporary Wagner soldiers are forcibly recruited criminals. If there's something less reliable than a mercenary, that's a forcibly recruited criminal.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

his name is a really easy banner to fly now.. he basically can't do anything wrong anymore.. he died a hero trying to save Russians from the corruption of Putin.. the anger will just grow, especially once that army in Ukraine starts knocking on doors inside Russia..

everyone sees that Putin just did it because he was AFRAID of Prigozhin

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even though I think that’s how it may have played in the West, it seemed like Prigozhin stayed pretty loyal to Putin all throughout, he was really careful to not lay any blame on Putin, more that he was misled. If anything, I wonder if blame will be placed on Shoigu, the Defense minister, that’s who Prigozhin’s beef was with I thought. I’d assume there will be some mob-style reprisals against Shoigu and/or the military leadership rather than against Putin himself. That still may benefit Ukrainians regardless.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Putin won't axe Shoigu he's his perfectly loyal Tuvan pet... not necessarily loyal to Putin (he started under Yeltsin), but to the office of the president: Shoigu is guaranteed to not make a move for office because he has no chance in the first place because racism.

He's pretty much the only person among the Siloviki who is guaranteed to not use their position as head of the army to putsch. Shoigu's best play is to be loyal to whoever happens to be his boss, and that's what he's doing. He may be otherwise incompetent bu he understands politics.

(Side note: Tuva does have a kickass national anthem, with throat singing and everything)

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=KQaw-li9NQ8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

Thank you for linking that. The anthem absolutely slaps. Now I wish I was Tuvan. Or, at the very least, I wish the Russian Federation would collapse so Tuva can participate in the Olympics under their own flag, and then I will cheer for them so I can hear this anthem.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i don't disagree with one bit of your analysis, i'm just not sure Shoigu will be enough once Ukrainians start driving tanks down Russian highways.. popcorn time in any case, like you say..

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

once Ukrainians start driving tanks down Russian highways

I doubt the West will supply arms for a large-scale invasion of Russia. They've already made it clear that the stuff that they are supplying is to be used only in Ukraine, occupied Ukraine, and Crimea, and not anywhere in Russia proper. And Ukraine has been very careful to strike inside Russia only with weapons that do not come from Western governments, and to aim only at military and government targets inside Russia. I doubt a 'real' invasion will happen. Drone worries and border skirmishes, certainly; actual march-on-Moscow invasion, I doubt it.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

nothing on this Earth is going to stop that Army.. they will do what they want now.. you just expressed every Russian's delusional dream..

Russians have some waking up in store for them

[–] athos77@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And on a more realistic note, Ukraine can only continue to fight as long as they have effective weapons, in large numbers - numbers too large for it's treasury to handle.

They have to get the arms from somewhere. Their best bet right now is the West, which has large amounts of various weapons designed to fight the Russians.

If they lost the support of the West, it's possible they could cobble together enough materiel from other sources - countries that would welcome Russian weakness, or welcome Russia's distraction, or see Ukraine as a buffer, or who simply want influence in the area. They could cobble together an arms supply from those sources, but the supply would be erratic, be less designed for interoperability, and would likely run out faster than the Ukrainians' need. I mean, even the US is struggling to supply enough munitions to Ukraine, I'm not sure who can keep up with the needed supply if the US steps out.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

that is not an Army "being supported by" anyone.. it exists. it was armed and trained by NATO, that's correct.. it is basically a NATO force now.. deal with it or not, they're going to show you..

there is no force anywhere in Europe that can stop that Army now.. it doesn't matter if you understand that or not.. they don't need help..

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can have the best, most elite fighting force on the face of the planet. They still need weapons, they still need ammo, they still need grenades and rockets and artillery shells, their weapons and tanks and APC's and drones still need servicing and replacements.

In short, Ukraine needs an entire war-oriented production line and logistics/supply system. They have one now, courtesy of the EU, the US, and Ukraine's other allies. A significant percentage of that military aid came from the US. The US is interested in helping Ukraine regain it's full sovereignty including Crimea, and protecting it's European allies. It has absolutely no interest in or appetite for, any real invasion of Russian soil. The US and the EU have repeatedly told Ukraine that Ukraine cannot use any materiel supplied by the US, the EU, or European nations, in any attack on Russia itself.

Ukraine cannot 'win' an invasion of Russia with the weapons it currently has: they don't have enough weapons or anywhere near enough ammo to do it. They may have enough for quick strike forces, but they certainly don't have enough men to actually occupy Russia. Your dream of Ukrainian tanks rolling down Russian highways is just that - a dream.

As for your assertion that "that is not an Army "being supported by" anyone [...] they don't need help": here is a list of military retirement that the US has sent so far - it doesn't even invite what Ukraine has received from other countries or companies. Please explain to me how Ukraine, even with the best army in the world, would win it's war without the weapons and ammo supplied by it's allies. And again, this is just a list of the US military aid, not the EU, not Australia or any of the other countries and companies sending supplies. U.S. security assistance to Ukraine between January 20, 2020, and June 27, 2023:

[Please see my reply to this comment, it's a long list]

[–] athos77@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

10,000 Javelin anti-armor systems

70,000 other anti-armor systems and

munitions

1,700 Stinger anti-aircraft systems

4,000 TOW missiles

35,000 grenade launchers and small arms,

with ammunition

100,000 sets of body armor and helmets

Thousands of night-vision devices,

surveillance systems, thermal imagery

systems, optics, and laser rangefinders

C-4 and other explosives

Explosive-ordnance-disposal equipment

M18A1 Claymore mines

Anti-tank mines

Mine-clearing equipment

Obstacle-emplacement equipment

Medical supplies

Field equipment, cold-weather gear,

generators, and spare parts

Chemical, biological, radiological, and

nuclear protective equipment

18 armored bridging systems

160 155mm Howitzers and ammunition

72 105mm Howitzers and ammunition

47 120mm mortar systems

10 82mm mortar systems

67 81mm mortar systems

58 60mm mortar systems

203mm, 152mm, 130mm, 122mm, 120mm,

and 25mm ammunition

38 HIMAR systems

60,000 122mm Grad rockets

Precision-guided rockets

Rocket launchers and ammunition

154 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles

4 Bradley Fire Support Team vehicles

31 Abrams tanks

45 T-72B tanks (via the Czech Republic)

125 Stryker armored personnel carriers

300 M113 armored personnel carriers

250 M1117 armored security vehicles

200 armored medical-treatment vehicles

500 MRAP vehicles

125mm, 120mm, and 105mm tank

ammunition

2,000 Humvees

354 tactical vehicles

100 light tactical vehicles

68 trucks

124 trailers

10 command post vehicles

30 ammunition support vehicles

6 armored utility trucks

8 logistics support vehicle

89 heavy fuel tankers and 105 fuel trailers

1 Patriot air defense battery and munitions

8 NASAM systems

20 Avenger air defense systems

HAWK air defense systems and munitions

Laser-guided rocket systems

RIM-7 missiles

Antiaircraft guns and ammunition

Equipment to integrate with and sustain

Ukraine’s systems

9 anti-drone gun trucks and ammunition

10 anti-drone laser-guided rocket systems

High-speed anti-radiation missiles

(HARMs)

Precision aerial munitions

6,000 Zuni aircraft rockets (could function

as air defense)

7,000 Hydra-70 aircraft rockets

20 Mi-17 helicopters

ScanEagle drones

Puma drones

JUMP drones

CyberLux K8 drones

Switchblade drones

Phoenix Ghost drones

ALTIUS-600 drones (can also be used for

surveillance)

Munitions

2 Harpoon coastal defense systems

62 coastal and riverine patrol boats

Unmanned coastal defense vessels

Port and harbor security equipment

4 satellite communications antennas

2 radars for unmanned aerial systems

21 air surveillance radars

70 counter-artillery and counter-

mortar radars

20 multi-mission radars

Tactical secure communications systems

Counter air defense capability

Counter–unmanned aerial systems

Electronic jamming equipment

SATCOM terminals and services

Commercial satellite imagery services

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you're working really hard.. good luck with that..

In short, Ukraine...

i love that you actually used the words, "in short".. just to demonstrate what a troll you are..

[–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

"And we'll hate him... cause he's a Dark Knight."

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] hdnsmbt@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nothing, and a few probably will. But a few small groups are much more easily handled. I wouldn't be surprised if smashing the group was the main motivation behind the plane crash.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a few small groups are much more easily handled

What about just one guy with a grudge and a shoulder-fired missile launcher (anti-aircraft or anti-tank, depending on how you prefer to travel)? I'm sure Putin himself has countermeasures but he may still have problems unless his men can track down every Wagnerite who may have taken home a souvenir from Ukraine.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You missed Afghanistan’s war huh?

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

That's a really good question. Lots of implications. Will they attack the Kremlin? Will they continue stabilizing dictatorships in Africa? Will the Kremlin get control of them and use them in Ukraine? Revenge assassinations?

[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Most of those "nationalists" are fucking statetists.