this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
683 points (99.1% liked)

Greentext

4867 readers
1820 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 157 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Always amazing when people don't get satire.

My Dad actually thought Starship Troopers was pro-military.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 hours ago

The book is pro military, the movie is a very intentional satire.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 43 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

So, I have read and been told this many times before. Some times I will rewatch the movie to try and see that narrative. And I'll admit, I'm and idiot. But I can't get past the idea of: Bugs are just icky, no matter the size. Remove at all costs.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Black Mirror: Men Against Fire S03E05 will help you figure it out

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I watched it way back when I was young and didn't get any of the satire. I watched in my 20s and I asked myself:

You have technology to move through space and shit, they could just rain bombs from orbit or throw asteroids onto the planet. But no! The best way to fight is to use masses of underquipped soldiers that fight the horrors of bugs.

The war seems secondary, killing soldiers looks like the first priority in these movies.

[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Let's just say that the government does just rain bombs from orbit. They are humans, there are gonna be dudes that want to get their feet on the ground to start shooting things. Regardless of the type of government, humans are creatures of destruction. People are gonna want to shoot an alien bug for a multitude of reasons. Glory, honor, to prove themselves, fascist government or not, people will be lining up around the block to sign up for an interstellar opportunity to be a 'badass'.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I will never understand how they made the entire movie and then had any possible thought people would understand their perspective. The problem is they got lost in the utopia part of the fascist utopia. Sure their culture looks weird from our perspective and has a fascist paint job., but is it really that bad of a society to live in as depicted? Everyone is depicted as generally agreeing with society and it's norms, society seems to filter people into the roles that actually let them reach the best of their own abilities and that of the culture. No semblance or poverty or even elitism -- except against bugs which are mindless as far as the audience knows. The closest we get to seeing that the bugs might be sentient is a psychic dude telling us that a prisoner of war is feeling fear while it is bound, defeated, and surrounded by its enemies.

[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The bugs colonized entire planets and has an empire that rivals the humans. That is far from being a mindless, non-sentient creature. If anything that screams they are more intelligent than humans because the bugs just shoot massive spores into space to accomplish all that.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Silkworms are bugs, as are honeybees

[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You won't find me hanging out with them, I'm afraid.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The most satire parts are not about fighting the bugs. The "only a dead ... is a good ..." is a classic fascist trope, but it's the parts about disregard of human life and health and the propaganda in the movie that really mock fascism.

[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Disregard to human life and health isn't limited to a fascist government though. As for the propaganda, I always took that at making fun of the military and their over the top commercials and other media.

I never compared it to the actual government.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

Except they aren't bugs in your home, they're isolated to their own planet already.

Plus, consider the justification for the attack;

"the bugs attacked Earth first"

REALLY?

Consider the amount of maths and physics knowledge for us to get to our own moon. We have to calculate the trajectory of our own moon, the spin of the Earth, gravity, etc.

Now, in the movie, apparently the bugs bombed Earth.

FUCKING HOW. They exist outside our solar system. The level of maths for this is impossible without computers.

Not only have you got all the complications we had for a celestial body which was closest to us, but our sun has its own orbit within the milky way.

The narrative that the bugs attacked Earth first was a false flag. It was almost certainly just a meteor which couldn't be stopped, which gave someone a reason to keep the perpetual motion machine of Fascism alive.

Without a common enemy, Fascism turns inwards.

[–] Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay, sure. But how is the bugs attacking first unlikely, when they are able to calculate that kind of interstellar trajectory to colonize all the other planets in their empire? They shoot spores into space and hit other planets to colonize.

Why could the bugs not have shot a colonizing spore at earth, or another human controlled planet, and that was perceived as an attack? The bugs empire rivaled the human empire after all.

Or am I missing something obvious here?

[–] So_zetta_slowpoke@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Lol alright, so earlier in the movie, Carmen is learning to fly the spaceship and has an accident where the run into the asteroid, which changes its trajectory and sends it to Earth, where it hits Buenos Aires. Carmen caused the whole thing 🤣

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

It's very likely that the Earth military lobbed it toward earth as a pretext for war. The big planet was light years away (across the galaxy? I forget) and there was propaganda extolling the orbital defenses of Earth right before the hit. They had an orbital ring station around the Moon! No way they could miss a rock that big.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The film is so on the nose, that in the end they come out with actual nazi uniforms and child soldiers and people still didn't get it.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 79 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

How?

That movie has the subtlety of a brick to the head

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 108 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So did The Boys and Helldiver's 2, and yet a substantial population of conservatives took it literally. Now The Boys has to be so blatant, it's not as funny anymore.

Some people are just idiots, just the way it is.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao about the boys. I started watching that and definitely in the first season it wasn’t even subtle, by the 4th season, which apparently is when conservatives got mad (?), it was beating you into submission with the messaging. Like, subtlety was not even in the lexicon, more like bulldozing you.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago

I stopped watching after season 2 because I couldn't stand the lack of subtlety - despite loving the original comic which is... not subtle at all.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe if they paid more attention in English (and history) class, they wouldn't miss subtext the size of a tractor trailer running into them. But conservatives and STEM bros almost always seem to be on the same page with that shit "No one needs English classes, it's always just like 'hur the curtains are blue' bro."

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Science here - a lot of my fellow scientists like the humanities and definitely are not missing the point. At least in the pure sciences, we tend to encourage all education, regardless of field.

Just be aware that STEM encompasses way more people than you're specifically referring to

[–] licheas@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because the dad read the book, and hasn't seen the movie.

The book definitely is pro-military.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

Actually, it was the movie lol.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 14 hours ago

They see the part that gives them a confirmation bias and willfully ignore the rest of the message.

As the saying goes: Spread the facts on the floor like a fan, and throw away the ones that make you feel bad.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like to know more.

In all seriousness though, I thought it had some aspects of good, which was odd given that it's satirical commentary on fascism. For instance, gender didn't really matter and women were promoted, and while the shower scene was meant to show how fascism castrates the masses (or something like that, iirc), I thought it was a relatively wholesome scene, all things considered.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Potentially some leakage from Heinlein's later works?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorta, not really.

The book is notable for its almost complete lack of sex on any level. The protagonist goes on a date with a woman at one point. That's about it. A shower scene where everyone is naked but nobody is horny would fit right in.

Stranger in a Strange Land, OTOH, goes completely the other way. I was reading that book on vacation, and a friend picked it up and peeked at a page about halfway through and started reading it out loud. The last half of that book is basically pornography, so . . .

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh, I know, I was more thinking that the film makers might have thought that they could add some stuff from his later works since they basically completely changed the movie script from his book.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A brick to the head...

Good idea.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

I already filled the sock with quarters.

I like the noise when it hits.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I like to use bars of soap personally.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I prefer cans of soup for my family

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago

Well, the book is... The movie tho, yeah Paul Verhoeven has opinions about fascists. 😂

His commentary on that film is truly one of the better commentary tracks I've ever listened to.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I know the book was but this sort of people who think that starship troopers is profascism, are also a sort of people that will definitely not be well read.

[–] B312@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I can interpret something as pro facist without being a facist. They are not mutually exclusive things

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's amazing the number of people who do.

It's got Neil Patrick Harris in it how on Earth can it possibly be pro military?