this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
422 points (87.3% liked)

Fediverse

28380 readers
1635 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I’m guessing you meant this sarcastically, but you may have been right for the wrong reasons. Look at this graph, by the metric of the way the fediverse works that is a failure. Apple and Google are massively dominant because people don’t want to think about it and most just go with their phone os maker who makes them create one when setting it up, and there is no fediverse server equivalent to that.

a graph of email users by domain. apple and gmail dominate.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This looks like it's conflating service providers and clients. Thunderbird doesn't provide email accounts to the public as far as I know.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

~~Same with Apple mail right? I never used an Apple device and was shocked to see them over Gmail because I thought Apple actually gives email service when I saw the graph~~

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Apple does have an email service, but I think "Apple Mail" is the name is the client, not the service.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Apple does give email service for two decades now

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Oh I see. Thanks for the clarification.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

Wow, I wouldn't have thought that Apple Mail is more popular than Gmail.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever received an e-mail from an Apple Mail address.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Same, does it go by another name or something?

[–] hobovision@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm pretty sure "apple mail" refers to the Mail app on iPhones and Macs, not the email address. There's probably tons of people using Gmail addresses with the Apple Mail app.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nevertheless email stays the defacto standard for business communication and has stayed intercompatible with a wide range of clients, servers and plugins. So this graph could be better but is apparently not a big issue as long as companies and unis keep running their own servers, forcing big tech to stay with the standards.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That works when the decentralized protocol is the 800 lb gorilla first. You can’t get there with the fediverse in this internet era, sadly.

Email also doesn’t have a moderation factor that requires emotional work.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The matrix protocol is a good example to prove you wrong. It has been popularized in the past 5-6 years (i.e. this era of the internet) it has well over 100 million users and growing, is being used in hundreds of universities and wont stop growing, is being used by government bodies all over the world and has unified most of the software dev landscape into one protocol. Its hard fucking work and you have to start with exactly those groups which are easier to convince and then you can move on to the average consumer. Thats how email did it and thats how matrix will do it.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So you are saying Mastodon won't take off because people need to choose a server but also because having a "default" where majority will ptobably end up is bad - but this is literally the solution to the problem you mentioned

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's the solution on the user experience side, but not the backend/server side. For both infrastructure and idealogical reasons. These two things don't have to be the same.

Disney parks wants park visitors to feel like their exploring, but design in such a way that thepy don't actually stray that far from the preferred paths. Also they have clear sign posting.

There's no reason the fediverse can't design the opposite. Helping users into feeling like there's a set path, and that they're doing the right thing, while subtly encouraging exploration.

It's just the opposite of where all talent and techniques of internet software design are right now, so it's going to take some work.

Edit: Most people don't jump into a hedge to get off the main road, they find a small, unplanned trail or desire path, then learn to navigate the jungle when that path ends.