this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1574 points (98.4% liked)

The Onion

4431 readers
2965 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

lol, you believe this?

Do I believe that about four months ago the Democratic Party made a desperate move to replace the incumbent candidate and there were very few viable options at the time? Yes, I believe that, because we just went through it about four months ago. It’s pretty much political suicide to withdraw an incumbent candidate. You don’t plan that from the beginning, because that would be a stupid plan. It was very likely “planned” as in “plan B,” but it’s kind of idiotic to think that it was plan A. The primary was not hijacked, the incumbent is always the candidate. Primaries are always a formality for the incumbent party.

[–] Rutty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

lol. And the DNC didn’t shill for Hilary Clinton in 2016 over Bernie Sanders

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nope, that DID happen. But you are ignoring the obvious reality in this case.

[–] Rutty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Please, you’re ignoring that the very obvious deduction that DNC didn’t want an open primary.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

And you’re ignoring history and the way the parties have always worked when they have the incumbent