this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1699 points (98.1% liked)

The Onion

4708 readers
339 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The funniest part of this is the idea that there will be an opposition party in anything but a token way after this.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was there a party that did not install SCOTUS justices that were so ideologically conservative that they did things like end national legal abortion and gut the ability of government regulation agencies to regulate?

Yes there was. But that party is not coming back except as a token now because people just didn't think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to vote.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But that party is not coming back except as a token now because people just didn’t think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to vote

"The party didn't think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to listen to their voters"

FTFY

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nope. They can't force anyone to vote for them. People thought not voting was a better plan than stopping the rapist fascist dictator when they only had two possible choices.

There was an absolute mountain of evidence that Trump would be a disaster. They didn't vote anyway because they knew they weren't going to get a pony.

Voting for people in a two-party system is the stupidest thing you can do because you will never get your way with any one politician. So you vote against and keep voting against until you get closer and closer to what you want.

Just not voting or voting for third party candidates that will clearly lose against someone who has an automatic 30% of the vote doesn't stop the worst possible thing from happening and it never will.

If you didn't vote to stop Trump from getting into office, I blame you. You had warning after warning and your idealism was more important to you.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 30 points 1 month ago (35 children)

They can’t force anyone to vote for them.

Yup, which is why you need to give them reason to vote.

Democrats have been parading around "most important election of our lifetime" for fucking years - don't be surprised that it didn't work yet again.

The reason why Trump is popular is because there is legitimate pain and struggle in the working class, and he affirmed that pain and struggle (even if he was misidentifying the source of that pain). Telling voters "things are good, actually, and the other guy is gonna ruin it" is just dumb.

Democrats didn't run on popular policy and they got destroyed because of it.

[–] ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Who said “things are good actually”?? Seems to me that Harris had plenty of policy proposals that would have resulted in a meaningful improvement to the bottom line of the average American.

Biden has also been better for the average American than trump was. For fucks sake, Trump actually got away with raising taxes on all of us to support his tax cut for the rich, simply because the average person is too low information to grasp the idea of a tax cut that expires!

So yeah, plenty of actual reasons to say that one candidate is better than the other, without needing to be wowed by an actual messiah who can dismantle our fucked up system and solve everybody’s problems.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

They repeatedly touted our economic recovery was 'the best in the G6'.

Even when our economy is 'good' it's shit for most people. That's the problem with being a neoliberal status quo party: it doesn't help most of the people they need to vote for them

[–] toddestan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Regardless of what Biden has done for the average American, his approval rating has been really bad for a while now. It may not be right or fair, but that's what it is.

Despite Harris not actually being the incumbent, the Republicans managed to associate her with Biden and she more or less embraced it. Then the Republicans were able to frame themselves as the challenger to an unpopular incumbent president and it's not surprising they did well.

Of course, it didn't help either that Harris is the VP either. Perhaps if we had a primary and managed to pick another candidate that could distance themselves a bit better from Biden things would be different.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Biden did very early and then learned to not say that again.

[–] GingerWitch@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your post is CLASSIC misdirection and misrepresenting what the Dems actually did. IF these elections were fair, and I've reason to think they were not, then they got lost on higher gas prices. Which is A PRETTY STUPID AND SELFISH reason to vote for/not care about mass deportations. And they lost it on not attacking trump on the border and on the economy.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So we are now in MAGA election rigging conspiracies? JFC. Trump even won the popular vote.

Look at the 2020 popular vote. Trump got 74 Mio. votes back then and 72 Mio. Now

The Dems went from 81 Mio. to 67 Mio.

The Dems succesfully fucked this up with uninspiring candidates and lack of vision to rally their voters.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

blue maga and blueanon wasn't just a sort of tongue in cheek name, it was also an accurate description. we've seen this shit burgeoning up, to me, most notably with the people who were adamant that trump didn't actually get shot and it was all a PR stunt. been lost in the sauce for a while.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was an absolute mountain of evidence that Trump would be a disaster.

nobody gives a fuck about that. most people aren't clocked into online politics. they just live under one admin where trump benefits from obama's policy, things are squeaky clean for the most part, and then they're chilling, and then they move to living under joe biden where a once in a lifetime (hopefully, haha) pandemic decides to fuck shit up during the transition from one admin to the other, on top of inheriting a much worse economy, and then they attribute that to biden. it's not a super complicated figure, there, and that's all on top of biden just not being a very popular candidate to begin with.

if you actually look at the numbers, then the third party candidates had less of an effect for kamala than the third party candidates for trump did. which makes sense, because RFK, at the least, was campaigning on some sort of dystopian vision of the future that his deluded q-anon supporters actually liked, and he had money. jill stein is just grifting like always, basically, no change there, and no change with the lesser known candidates either, really. the bigger story is that a shit ton of the voters stayed home.

everyone wants to shift blame from the democratic party, which has obviously either mishandled this campaign or intentionally lost as a party of controlled opposition, and shift the blame onto the voters. ah, well, it was latino men's fault for being too socially conservative! ah, it was the third party voters and the leftists! it was the arab americans, who should've voted after we funded the bombs that killed their whole entire family! it was trans people, for just being too weird! those are all legitimate explanations I've heard people bring up, and I'd classify them all as basically the same, because they all equally have no evidence behind them. the real story is that she had low voter turnout. probably because she was associated with the least popular administration in decades, and refused to distinguish herself from that, and on top of that, campaigned with like, liz cheney. the most she did was offer like, tax exemptions for people starting small businesses, and tax exemptions for people who haven't missed their rent a single time in the last kajillion years. it's not rocket science, that's just not really an inspiring campaign. if they had low voter turnout, that's probably why, it's probably not because america is just too racist to vote for a black woman or whatever shit everyone's bloviating about so they can justify the democratic party turning to the right even more.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I keep seeing this "people let the fascist genocidal dictator get in because they weren't excited about Harris" excuse as if it is a good one. It isn't.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's not an excuse, we're just telling you the reality. how do you think hitler got elected?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He didn't win the popular vote and it wasn't about people not voting.

Maybe you should look this up before asking a question like that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1933_German_federal_election

[–] GingerWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree with Flying Squid. It's bizarre to think any sane person would now decide that the right strategy is to hate on minorities, or ditch all pretty normal behaviour such as adhere to the FUCKING LAW, NOT LIE (and spare me the #FalseEquivalence, it's jaywalking Dems vs serial rapist Trump) and listen to effing EXPERTS. Dems should stick to their principles and await the serious shit show which is gonna happen with mass deportations, tariffs and even MORE INFLATION.