1096
After all, how far inland could a hurricane go?
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
1096 points (98.7% liked)
Microblog Memes
5467 readers
3161 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Lemmy.ml does. Lemmy.world does not. Come over to the dark side.
Eh, as long as you're not spreading western propaganda you can pretty much say what you want. Fuck Russia!
Apparently you can't what with the profanity filter.
You can't use racial slurs or derogatory words, but you don't actually need to resort to such profanity to communicate a point.... and I feel that if you do, then you probably are worth filtering out.
Filtering out "bitch" is some weak sauce, man.
Ah I see, you're baiting me. Have a good day, sir!
No... I'm giving you my opinion on this whole discussion, which started with someone complaining that "bitch" is censored on lemmy.ml.
Telling that you are bowing out now though.
Yeah on .World you can use the any insult as long as it's followed by "Jill Stein" or "Donald Trump". No criticism of Kamala Harris allowed though.
Imagine censoring a Genocide and then bragging about "free speech".
Weird how you just did it then.
Oh sorry, I thought you were trolling me by literally writing "removed". I just now followed your fediverse link and can see that you wrote "removed".
Yes that word is replaced on the server. I would say it's a bit overkill too, but hey it's a derogatory word towards women, so I think there are more general words like "fuck", "shit", "dick" and "cunt" that can be swapped in to convey the same point.
Your ignorance is astounding.
inform me then, otherwise I'm just going to propagate whatever specific thing you're vaguely objecting to
The words you've suggested are more objectionable than the word you're objecting to.
If you want to claim a position of supremacy and justice in linguistic expression, you should educate yourself on the words you're choosing to use.
I'm not asserting that the word bitch is more objectionable than any other 'curse' word.
You're claiming that.
The B word at present targets women specifically. The other words can be used extremely generally and even liberally in good humour over the pond.
I'm quite surprised you take the opposite position on this, but I'm happy to learn more.
I'm not offended by it. I know of folks who would rank many of the words you've listed as much more harshly interpreted. In addition american broadcasting standards are a good starting point, if you're asking in good faith for understanding the idea.
What is your first/preferred language?
I think my search skills suck, since I couldn't find anything specific to curse words in the US, other than the "Seven Dirty Words" from George Carlin[0,1]. From what I understand, the FCC does not have an official list of words[2], even on their official website[3] (which seems to lack a fact sheet), but does seem to follow what Carlin said. That leads me to believe that the words I wrote are offensive on a cultural basis. The B word is notably absent from all these lists, which I do find strange as a Brit, since calling someone a B is far more targetted[4, see Table1] at women than calling someone a cunt or a twat (which can be used equally and even colloquially).
In German media, swearing is virtually completely allowed, though I can only find secondary sources. Hell even in our "congress", swearing happens quite freely[5].
0: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_dirty_words
1: https://uslawdictionary.com/seven-dirty-words/
2: https://help.prx.org/hc/en-us/articles/360044988133-A-guide-to-broadcast-obscenities-and-issuing-content-advisories
3: https://www.fcc.gov/enforcement/areas/broadcast-obscenity-indecency-profanity
4: https://www.york.ac.uk/language/ypl/ypl2/18/YPL2-18-02-Sinar.pdf, Table 1
5: https://www.vice.com/de/article/von-arschloch-bis-hurensohn-die-haufigsten-beleidigungen-im-bundestag/
fuck Russia? that's western propaganda already! Russia is an innocent nation being forced to invade its surroundings because NATO exists, it all makes complete sense as long as you ascribe to the literal geopolitical framework of the Nazis (geo-political realpolitik, yes a large part of said ideology was literally authored by a few prominent Nazis, no wonder everyone who uses it just ends up doing evil shit)
Right, and everything Russia does is amazing. Come on, whilst I agree that NATO is definitely more of an aggressor in this conflict than western media portrays, that doesn't excuse the atrocities committed within it, no more than I can accept the atrocities committed within my own western country.
All governments do bad things, and objection to one of those things does not equate unbridled support for their enemies. To see the world so black and white is hollywood fiction.