this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
326 points (87.7% liked)

science

14812 readers
122 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn't the men who were "best" at masturbation have the fewest children?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Have you had sex? One doesnt prevent the other from happening

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, they wouldn't. What does "best" mean in this context, anyway?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

So the best masturbator in history probably only got to try it once?

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

He means they wouldn't need women, because they were THE BEST!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Can confirm. I am the best at masturbation and I only have one child.