switchboard_pete

joined 1 month ago
[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

video

can't answer for wow but i imagine the change is similar for runescape, where

  • people engage with the game more efficiently than before, which slurps the fun out
  • people have jobs now, so they don't have as much free time to play games
[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

you've been scammed because that's only 6

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i don't really understand how you make use of them like this when they inherently make all of duh rules

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 23 points 4 days ago

the tld is .uk in that case

just take the L good lord

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 9 points 4 days ago

Hozier's Moment's Silence (Common Tongue) references Trump in the first line

Highly Suspect's Viper Strike is more or less all about him and his ilk

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago
  • absolute population growing
  • share of population with feasible access to pokemon-compatible consoles growing
  • share of population who see video games as a legitimate pastime growing
[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

i don't get it

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like, what "leeway" does Kamala have to say anything different than she already has, which she could shift to?

a significant enough chunk of her voter base credibly withholding a vote based on a desired policy change would force a shift toward that desired policy change

i'd say biden's platform in 2020 was significantly more left-wing than clinton's in 2016

But that was then, and this is now.

this is the same "it's too late" or "it's too unprecedented" or whatever you want to pick that was exactly the justification for biden being kept in as long as he was

I think it really does show voting not for a 3rd party but voting for the other side b/c "bOtH sIdEs ArE tHe SaMe" (the title of the post), specifically wrt genocide.

people the post targets aren't voting red. they're just not voting at all, or voting third party. it's an argument to a position held by an insignificant fraction of the left-anti-harris crowd.

it doesn't address the core issue they have. they'd say that continuing to vote for the least-bad party is the reason both parties are bad, and that at a certain point you have to attempt to force a more radical change.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

they're not suggesting a third party candidate can win

they're suggesting that the democratic platform can shift

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

which is what people said before biden was replaced

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

which is what people said before biden was replaced

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 103 points 1 week ago (13 children)

it was her fault for spilling the e. coli in her lap

view more: next ›