shawn1122

joined 1 month ago
[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yea exactly! The user sets an interval and then the app sends a push notification saying 'its been x hours since last feeding' or diaper change etc. Ideally can choose ringtone, vibrate or of its just a regular notification and it would be available for specifically recurring activities (feeding, diaper change, sleeping and pumping).

Also an option to record in imperial units (ounces) would be great too!

It appears that the home screen doesn't refresh upon adding an entry also. Have to toggle to a different view and come back for the timer and summary to refresh. Ideally it would update immediately.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Great app! Especially like the timer from last feeding, diaper etc. Would it be possible to institute an alarm / notification after a certain time [set by the user] as a sort of reminder tool?

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The reason for Modi's approval is very similar to Trumps. He's very good at blaming the other (in this case Muslims and several other groups).

He's also in power at a time when India was inevitably going to grow stronger economically and people can feel that. GDP is growing at 7-8% annually which is massive for a country of India's size, even if GDP per capita leaves a lot to be desired.

Though India is developing at a steady pace now and is on a trajectory to be a developed nation in two decades, I don't think I'd rush to give Modi credit for that. It's a relatively untapped market that constitutes a fifth of humanity. It was bound to grow barring war, natural disaster, crippling geopolitical / trade tensions etc. He's just at the right place at the right time and had the right type of divisive rhetoric that seems to be hot all over the world right now.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

The common knowledge among those interested in the history is that Britain insitutionalized and entrenched caste in an administrative framework that never before existed in India.

They generally saw their colonial subjects as tools for financial gain and wished they could stay out of the messy sociologic aspects of how different people may relate to each other. On a more fundamental level, they didn't see them as people.

They also implicated skin color in caste in a way that it was not previously. Their perception of the world at the time was very much "white = good" and "anything other than white = bad" and they couldn't help but apply that framework to all human relations.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're right. They also didn't create colorism, which has existed in every human society since the dawn of time.

What they did do is institutionalize and entrench caste. They applied their racialized view of the world and interpreted caste as "low caste = dark skin = bad" and "high caste = fair skin = good" There is nothing in ancient Indian literature that connects caste to skin tone.

There is however significant literature tying caste to virtue. Low caste individuals in India are disenfranchised similar to African Americans in the US.

The British didn't help the issue by identifying certain castes as innately criminal, subjecting them to constant police surveillance and even imprisoning them premptively.

The Indian government, at its inception, outlawed caste discrimination and there are several affirmative action plans in place to provide increased oppurunities to disenfranchised castes but, similar to the African American community in the US, execution of such plans and positive outcomes are still lacking.

During his visit to Kerala, India in 1959, Martin Luther King Jr. was being introduced by a school principal: "Young people, I would like to present to you a fellow untouchable from the United States of America" Initially shocked, he reflected and then responded: "Yes, I am an untouchable, and every Negro in the United States is an untouchable"

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

According to a Leger poll, 64% of Canadians would vote for Kamala Harris, while 21% would support Donald Trump, with 15% undecided. Conservative voters in Canada were nearly evenly split, with 42% supporting Harris and 45% backing Trump.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/majority-of-canadians-would-vote-for-kamala-harris-in-u-s-election-poll-1.7086714

Trump would lose the election if Canada were a state, barring any electoral college shenanigans.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just installed it today. Significantly improved voice typing over Google and its processed locally on your device, not server side like everything Google.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

American culture magnifies it.

Pickup trucks have evolved from work vehicles into powerful status symbols in American culture. While 75% of truck owners rarely or never use them for towing, they purchase these vehicles as symbols of success, masculinity, and lifestyle choice. In urban and suburban areas, professionals spend $70,000+ on trucks as alternatives to luxury cars, particularly in Southern states where they represent wealth and power. The trend continues growing, with trucks now accounting for 20% of U.S. vehicle sales. Despite minimal towing usage, truck owners display the highest vehicle loyalty rate, with nearly 80% choosing another truck when replacing their current one.

Meanwhile China is slowly working towards global dominance in the EV space which we all know is the future.

The American empire is in that stage of decay where the men are actively lying to themselves about their greatness. The whole manosphere (which originated in the US) is based on that premise.

As they feel themselves sliding further and further into the periphery of relevance, they'll elect increasingly fascist leaders to try and reassert their dominance, only to be swindled by those they put into power.

It's all downhill from here.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

80% of Latinos are citizens and those that voted must hold citizenship. Expressing shaudenfraude over the possibility of denaturalization is a level of capitulation so profound it makes it feel as if some of our liberal brethren are invertebrates.

White liberals taking joy in the fact that they and their families can have freedom of choice reinforces age old racial hierarchies. Yes, your uncle might be a racist, sexist, narcissist, but no one is going to question their citizenship over it.

Meanwhile, PoC must vote Democrat and if they don't, their white liberal compatriots will applaud when they're put in cages and extricated from the country. The racial hierarchy is reinforced when PoC are not granted agency.

They must vote the way I think is right. Otherwise, I will join hands with my regressive conservative kin and shamelessly capitulate as we take glee in the racial purification of America.

Do you all even believe in what you say you believe in? If these are our allies, who needs enemies?

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

I find that in many cases, if you actually click the link to find the sourced information, it's not there. I've experienced this with nearly every LLM front-end platform.

view more: ‹ prev next ›