There's plenty of evidence of voter suppression and election interference, plus the fact that bullet ballots were like 500% higher in only swing states than every other election in history.
I'm not sure we can definitively say that this is what the electorate wanted.
That's why my old doctor opened up a concierge practice. You pay a yearly membership fee, a low office fee, then everything else is at cost.
She followed it by saying, "you people are next." that's the problem. The title buried the lead.
You can read her mind?
You do realize that it's possible to possess a weapon that isn't registered to you, right?
Why would you not take a person referencing a recent assassination and telling you that you are next seriously? I'd 100% call the cops if that happened to me when I was a call center agent.
It's usually a bad idea to outright dismiss a perceived terroristic threat. While it might be a prediction and not a threat, that's for the courts to decide, not the cops.
If someone referenced a very recent assassination and told me I was next, I would take that as a credible threat and call the cops.
She followed it by saying they were next. Definitely a threat of violence.
She won't since her next words were, "You're next."
Nah, he was white
Incognito doesn't block tracking.
You're not buying the movie. You're buying a license to watch it on that platform.
Her saying, "you people are next," is what makes it a threat, thus not protected under free speech.