pearsaltchocolatebar

joined 1 year ago
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, that's up to the courts and investigators to prove. Cops did the right thing here, for once.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago

He should be, yes.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, but it's usually not the building residents that take them down. The vast majority of mesothelioma cases are people who worked with asbestos as part of their job.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That doesn't get rid of the need for DNS. And ipv6 won't get rid of the need to load balance using dns.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago

Were their threats recorded? The fact that people have said worse doesn't change the fact that it was a threat.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago

The bond is ridiculous, but the arrest wasn't.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Free speech doesn't conver threats.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago

The depose part was the assassin's, and she followed it with, "You people are next." context is important, and context makes this a threat.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"you people are next," also isn't part of it.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It doesn't cover threats of violence.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If someone referenced a recent assassination then said, "You people are next," would you seriously not take that as a threat?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How do you know she didn't have means to do it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›