You'll have to be a bit more specific as I don't have time to read all of his works... is there a specific book, theory, or argument your referencing here?
so if porn was not allowed on this site, and was only hosted on site with bestiality or CP categories you're argument is you would never look at porn ? people go to sketchy shitty sites all the time for porn thats not allowed in better spaces.
It really should. If you feel like "people consensually shitting on eachother" is the same as "people raping children" then you need to realize there's a difference between " I don't like this" and "this is illegal, rape, and deeply damaging to society"
Thanks for all your work on this, if you end up having a hard time finding someone I would definitly be up for it.
It was under its own community, they just banned that community
Who are you to define what is nsfl. There are people in here arguing consensual non consent is nsfl. How long till furry or trans communities are banned too
Would you guys federate with another instance hosting this sort of data if it gets banned?
That's how it works here too... what they are saying is should we ban the scat sub from reddit. If you don't like scat don't go to scat, or block the community.
I mean if we are banning individual fetishes, where do you draw the line...
Not Safe For Life has never to my knowledge conventionally included scat/extreme fetishes. I've always heard it used to describe things like gore, death, etc.
One other issue with voting on weather fetishes are acceptable is you risk the stability of other subs. For example if people recognize that they can get fetishes tagged as nsfl and removed what happens when a conservative group comes in and targets the multiple trans communities we have here stating they are nsfl. And after that they could reasonably expand that to futas. And so on...
strange, have you tried leaving show nsfw unchecked, and enabling it in settings after ?
Personally i think the rule should be removed, as long as the other rule regarding all characters appearing over 18 stays in place. Its very difficult to find the canonical age for all characters people post to hentai subs, and if the instance gains traction that will only get harder. Also the cononical age rule in my opinion brings up more problems than it solves due to "3000 year old dragon loli's" which in my opinion are obviously loli bait and should be banned, but would technically be over the canonical age line.
so i look at hentai similar to cosplays, if the person cosplaying a character is 30, i see it as that character at 30. If at 14 year old were cosplaying a 30 year old, thinking about them sexually would be predatory and trash.
One of the other issues, is there are fetishes that are less controversial (Itty Bitty Titty Comitty) that depending on how you define sexual characteristics are actually riskier legally/ethically than an age adjusted character (let alone more controversial fetishes like ABDL,Size Differences, etc)
I think at the end of the day, as long as the admins are staunchly against CP, we should be able to see if any communities are posting it. CP in my opinion is very much like porn in that its hard to define but you know when you see it.
I'm glad that's how you feel, but for many in the us trans is worse than scat. For many in the middle east non straight is worse than scat.
We shouldn't let the majority dictate what fetishes are allowed niche ones will always lose (again outside of legality issues/concerns, or ones that actively hurt society (even if CP was legal it should be banned due to the damage it does to those affected)