gxgx55

joined 1 year ago
[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you're putting words in my mouth, never did I imply or think that Ukraine is responsible for what is happening, or that Ukraine is not right in wanting all their territory back. However, it is factual that if Ukraine wants to secure its territory, which is entirely justified, it will not be by means that are describable as "peace" or "peaceful", because russia is not backing down like complete idiots(a common theme).

Is what I am saying false?

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Fair enough. I guess I've spent too much time seeing disingenuous calls for "peace" on the internet, mostly by pro-russia shills, with the intent of painting the western support of Ukraine as evil warmongering or something.

We do wish for peace ultimately, but there's a whole lot of violence to happen if it is going to be on Ukrainian terms, because russia does not look like it wants to back down.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Considering the Ukrainian position is basically "any loss of territory is unacceptable", there is little room for both peace negotiation AND support for Ukraine simultaneously. Tough position.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

but working in tech I just know there's no such thing as "online gambling".

I wouldn't call pseudorandomess(if that's what you're implying) as disqualifying something from being gambling - it only needs to be random enough with an even distribution.

If instead you're talking about odds being slightly in favor of the house then... that's literally no different than gambling irl either. At which point, I have to question what you even define as "gambling".

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's the charm! Make one big goal, and it shatters into a hundred small, achievable ones.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mileage will vary depending on the type of games you enjoy. In particular, the worst group of games are multiplayer competitive with invasive anti-cheats - those tend just not work at all.

Otherwise, gaming in general has gotten very viable(especially easy on Steam), they run anywhere from okay to great from my experience.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe you're right. Best we can do is be active here.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That'd be a silver lining if it were to work out that way. However, seeing the stats of old.reddit usage is depressing - it's a very small minority, would barely make a dent in reddit's traffic if every old.reddit user migrated in such a case.

My personal issue is that reddit has that critical mass to not only sustain generic wide-appeal communities, which Lemmy also achieves, but also small niche communities, which Lemmy really doesn't for the most part. Reddit needs to fuck up even worse, way worse than just discontinuing old.reddit.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I find that most of those issues are nonexistent the way I am on reddit - just use old.reddit everywhere. Yes, even on mobile. I'm special, and not in a good way, but it works.

I fear the day old.reddit gets shut down, considering the amount of communities that don't have an (alive) analog on Lemmy, so for now I use both...

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 134 points 1 year ago (17 children)

My problem with Lemmy is the lack of activity in niche communities. You're right that there needs to be a critical mass and arguably Lemmy has it, but only for the most mainstream, generic type of content. It doesn't have the mass to sustain any sort of niche, outside of maybe tech related topics because of the way the userbase is slanted.

I find myself going back there often because of that, but I hope that the userbase for generic content enough to sustain and grow, from where more active niche communities can spring up.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I... am?

What is this, I am against dictatorial abominations, so that means I am in favor of capitalist abuse? I am literally saying that opposition to capitalism is shooting itself in the foot by tolerating the existence of authoritarian "communists".

Unless you're an actual tankie, your words towards me make no sense.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Poorly, but not worse than a dictatorship(such as the USSR).

What's your point?

view more: next ›